07-13-2008, 10:28 PM
<b>Govt. confident of getting exemption from NSG</b>
New Delhi (PTI) The government on Saturday insisted that the country's "sovereign" interests, including in strategic nuclear field, were protected in the the IAEA safeguards agreement and expressed confidence about getting an exemption from the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
It also ruled out putting Fast Breeder Test Reactors under the IAEA safeguards and asserted that the country's Intellectual Property Rights are firmly protected.
With questions being raised over the agreement, the government fielded its top officials -- National Security Adviser M K Narayanan, Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon, Atomic Energy Commission chief Anil Kakodkar and chief negotiator R B Grover -- to "explain" that the pact is in India's interest.
They claimed that the agreement was still under negotiation when the Left parties decided to withdraw support to the government and was initialled on July 7.
A formal letter to IAEA, asking it to circulate the draft, was sent on July 8 after the Left parties announced their decision not to attend the last meeting of UPA-Left committee scheduled for July 10 which was to finalise its findings.
"A negotiating text of an agreement cannot be given out till it is complete," Menon told a press conference here.
They said the agreement was not initialled till the Indian government was satisfied that all its interests have been protected.
Under the agreement, IAEA safeguards will apply to civil nuclear facilities identified solely by India, the officials said, adding the pact recognises nuclear programme outside the civilian field.
Contending that the country's "strategic (nuclear) programme is totally insulated" in the safeguards agreement with IAEA, Kakodkar said "There is a non-hindrance provision" in the pact.
Research and development in the strategic area will continue, he asserted.
On the right to conduct a nuclear explosion, he pointed out that India has already declared a unilateral moratorium on tests.
Seeking to allay apprehensions that the IAEA inspectors could get an idea of the country's strategic research and development, he said India is under no obligation to share technology unless it wants.
The IPR rights are taken care of, he said, adding India had a long experience of safeguards agreement since Tarapur plant in 1960s.
This agreement is different and specific to India as it is an umbrella pact that the IAEA has with a non-NPT country.
Asked when the agreement with IAEA will be signed, Narayanan said it could be done any time after the Board of Governors of the UN agency approve the pact and NSG gives a "clean exemption".
After that, "We will be at liberty to sign the agreement even after three years... We will sign when we think all the necessary conditions are fulfilled," he said.
He hoped the IAEA Board of Directors would meet by the end of this month to take up the India-specific safeguards agreement.
Asked whether India could withdraw from the agreement if supplies were disrupted to a particular facility, Narayanan said if such a situation arises, India would have the right to take corrective steps.
Kakodkar said the "corrective" measures will include legal steps. The corrective steps will depend on the threat of disruption to a nuclear facility.
He, however, expressed confidence that such a situation will not arise, arguing that there are enough layers to ensure that operation of a nuclear facility is not disrupted.
In this regard, he cited the provision for uninterrupted supplies and creation of strategic reserve for the lifetime of a reactor.
If there is disruption in supplies, India will report it to the IAEA, Kakodkar said. He, however, added that discontinuation will not happen suddenly as there is provision for discussions.
Kakodkar was also dismissive about the argument that the safeguards agreement treats India as a non-nuclear weapon country. "We are a nuclear weapon state. We know that and the world knows that. We should not worry about that," he said.
He maintained that the definition of nuclear weapon state was derived from NPT, of which India is not a part.
To press his point, he said the IAEA safeguards agreement recognises that India has a nuclear programme outside the civil nuclear programme.
To a question, Kakodkar said India can export nuclear items to a third country as per the export guidelines, which are "very strict".
While exporting, India will be insisting that the receiving country puts the particular facility under IAEA safeguards, he said.
New Delhi (PTI) The government on Saturday insisted that the country's "sovereign" interests, including in strategic nuclear field, were protected in the the IAEA safeguards agreement and expressed confidence about getting an exemption from the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
It also ruled out putting Fast Breeder Test Reactors under the IAEA safeguards and asserted that the country's Intellectual Property Rights are firmly protected.
With questions being raised over the agreement, the government fielded its top officials -- National Security Adviser M K Narayanan, Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon, Atomic Energy Commission chief Anil Kakodkar and chief negotiator R B Grover -- to "explain" that the pact is in India's interest.
They claimed that the agreement was still under negotiation when the Left parties decided to withdraw support to the government and was initialled on July 7.
A formal letter to IAEA, asking it to circulate the draft, was sent on July 8 after the Left parties announced their decision not to attend the last meeting of UPA-Left committee scheduled for July 10 which was to finalise its findings.
"A negotiating text of an agreement cannot be given out till it is complete," Menon told a press conference here.
They said the agreement was not initialled till the Indian government was satisfied that all its interests have been protected.
Under the agreement, IAEA safeguards will apply to civil nuclear facilities identified solely by India, the officials said, adding the pact recognises nuclear programme outside the civilian field.
Contending that the country's "strategic (nuclear) programme is totally insulated" in the safeguards agreement with IAEA, Kakodkar said "There is a non-hindrance provision" in the pact.
Research and development in the strategic area will continue, he asserted.
On the right to conduct a nuclear explosion, he pointed out that India has already declared a unilateral moratorium on tests.
Seeking to allay apprehensions that the IAEA inspectors could get an idea of the country's strategic research and development, he said India is under no obligation to share technology unless it wants.
The IPR rights are taken care of, he said, adding India had a long experience of safeguards agreement since Tarapur plant in 1960s.
This agreement is different and specific to India as it is an umbrella pact that the IAEA has with a non-NPT country.
Asked when the agreement with IAEA will be signed, Narayanan said it could be done any time after the Board of Governors of the UN agency approve the pact and NSG gives a "clean exemption".
After that, "We will be at liberty to sign the agreement even after three years... We will sign when we think all the necessary conditions are fulfilled," he said.
He hoped the IAEA Board of Directors would meet by the end of this month to take up the India-specific safeguards agreement.
Asked whether India could withdraw from the agreement if supplies were disrupted to a particular facility, Narayanan said if such a situation arises, India would have the right to take corrective steps.
Kakodkar said the "corrective" measures will include legal steps. The corrective steps will depend on the threat of disruption to a nuclear facility.
He, however, expressed confidence that such a situation will not arise, arguing that there are enough layers to ensure that operation of a nuclear facility is not disrupted.
In this regard, he cited the provision for uninterrupted supplies and creation of strategic reserve for the lifetime of a reactor.
If there is disruption in supplies, India will report it to the IAEA, Kakodkar said. He, however, added that discontinuation will not happen suddenly as there is provision for discussions.
Kakodkar was also dismissive about the argument that the safeguards agreement treats India as a non-nuclear weapon country. "We are a nuclear weapon state. We know that and the world knows that. We should not worry about that," he said.
He maintained that the definition of nuclear weapon state was derived from NPT, of which India is not a part.
To press his point, he said the IAEA safeguards agreement recognises that India has a nuclear programme outside the civil nuclear programme.
To a question, Kakodkar said India can export nuclear items to a third country as per the export guidelines, which are "very strict".
While exporting, India will be insisting that the receiving country puts the particular facility under IAEA safeguards, he said.