07-21-2008, 01:37 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-ramana+Jul 20 2008, 08:25 PM-->QUOTE(ramana @ Jul 20 2008, 08:25 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->The IM leadership- both Westernized and Ummahized supported the INC thinking that they can preserve their interests in India. What the deal does is give free hand to US to tackle the greater ummah. The choice before the IM leadership is to be relevant and protect the group interests in India and abroad or lose their base ot more radical IM leaders who will emerge. So they will support the BJP or move over to the new leadership that will follow.
[right][snapback]84659[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The IM leadership consists of
1. Deobandi mullahs - Maulana Azad types who plan to islamise India by
breeding
2. Left over Muslim Leaguers who wanted to merge with pakistan
The INC gave them a lifeline in 1947, since it wanted a captive
vote bank
The INC did not need to have given them a life line in 1947-48
and let nature take its course as in east punjab
Are you calling Owaisi as less radical than future muslim radicals
Owaisis dad was a Razakar leader
They will never support BJP
( except for Shias, who know that TSP is worse for shias than hindutva )
[right][snapback]84659[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The IM leadership consists of
1. Deobandi mullahs - Maulana Azad types who plan to islamise India by
breeding
2. Left over Muslim Leaguers who wanted to merge with pakistan
The INC gave them a lifeline in 1947, since it wanted a captive
vote bank
The INC did not need to have given them a life line in 1947-48
and let nature take its course as in east punjab
Are you calling Owaisi as less radical than future muslim radicals
Owaisis dad was a Razakar leader
They will never support BJP
( except for Shias, who know that TSP is worse for shias than hindutva )