Countercurrents is an openly communist site - many of the (in)famous Indian communist circle write there. The rest are at one of their other watering holes - like communalist-wombat or something.
Hindu and communist is mutually exclusive, when someone becomes a (christoislami)communist they cease to be a Hindu. I am presuming the same is true for Sikhs. <b>ADDED:</b> That is, that anyone who becomes a christoislamicommunist cannot be a Sikh.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Discrediting the author is not going to help us, discrediting their nonsense will help us.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Though I don't know anything about this Purdaheep, I find that in general, the two kinds of discrediting are the same thing: if an author subscribes to a scary ideology and has written ideologically-inspired nonsense before, it makes full sense for me to ignore every piece of dribble they write after that (until they dump their terrorist ideology completely). Otherwise it's like saying one has to evaluate each speech of OBL for profundity after the initial ones where he islamically threatened the unconverted. We already know inanity is going to flow. These kinds of people discredit themselves when they write/speak their usual nonsense, we merely have the right to put them on our ignore list once we recognise their tired old pattern/arguments/song. "Oh no, it's the same lame twat talking again, Mute."
Hindu and communist is mutually exclusive, when someone becomes a (christoislami)communist they cease to be a Hindu. I am presuming the same is true for Sikhs. <b>ADDED:</b> That is, that anyone who becomes a christoislamicommunist cannot be a Sikh.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Discrediting the author is not going to help us, discrediting their nonsense will help us.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Though I don't know anything about this Purdaheep, I find that in general, the two kinds of discrediting are the same thing: if an author subscribes to a scary ideology and has written ideologically-inspired nonsense before, it makes full sense for me to ignore every piece of dribble they write after that (until they dump their terrorist ideology completely). Otherwise it's like saying one has to evaluate each speech of OBL for profundity after the initial ones where he islamically threatened the unconverted. We already know inanity is going to flow. These kinds of people discredit themselves when they write/speak their usual nonsense, we merely have the right to put them on our ignore list once we recognise their tired old pattern/arguments/song. "Oh no, it's the same lame twat talking again, Mute."