<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Aug 17 2008, 03:54 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Aug 17 2008, 03:54 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Questioned about the Kashmir violence having a wider communal ramification elsewhere in the country at present, she said, "That's why I am so distressed over what is happening in Kashmir. <b>For heaven's sake it should be brought to a stop and it should have been brought to a stop right when they started that nonsense."</b>
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indian_democracy_unfair_to_Muslims_Shabana_Azmi/articleshow/3371893.cms[right][snapback]86571[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Has she been yelling that the ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Hindus in Kashmir should have been brought to a stop, and that the constant changes in demographics wrought by islam should be brought to a stop, and that islami jihadism (though it must be said that islam <i>is</i> jihadism, everything else is just dressing) should be brought to a stop?
Else she can just shut up. No amount of her whining is going to change that the unconverted all over the world recognise islam is a ideology of terrorism. There's only so much covering-up that lies (hers or other pseculars') can do.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Now, I mean, if Javed Akhtar and Shabana Azmi cannot get a flat in Bombay because they are Muslims, then what are we talking about?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->She should come down from her uppityness.
Perhaps they didn't let her communal self and her communal husband get flats just because of who they were: Hindus don't like communalist islamis pretending they're secular and mouthing off against Hindu Dharma whenever they can, all while defending everyday jihad as if it was innocent or pretending it was some kind of struggle for rights.
If Mumbai isn't giving flats to islamis, I'm sure Hindus in Mumbai (not Bombay) have had enough of jihadism that they would have learnt to not invite trouble and the inevitable islamic rioting.
But I'm guessing that if Abdul Kalam wanted to move in next door, they wouldn't have an issue.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indian_democracy_unfair_to_Muslims_Shabana_Azmi/articleshow/3371893.cms[right][snapback]86571[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Has she been yelling that the ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Hindus in Kashmir should have been brought to a stop, and that the constant changes in demographics wrought by islam should be brought to a stop, and that islami jihadism (though it must be said that islam <i>is</i> jihadism, everything else is just dressing) should be brought to a stop?
Else she can just shut up. No amount of her whining is going to change that the unconverted all over the world recognise islam is a ideology of terrorism. There's only so much covering-up that lies (hers or other pseculars') can do.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Now, I mean, if Javed Akhtar and Shabana Azmi cannot get a flat in Bombay because they are Muslims, then what are we talking about?<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->She should come down from her uppityness.
Perhaps they didn't let her communal self and her communal husband get flats just because of who they were: Hindus don't like communalist islamis pretending they're secular and mouthing off against Hindu Dharma whenever they can, all while defending everyday jihad as if it was innocent or pretending it was some kind of struggle for rights.
If Mumbai isn't giving flats to islamis, I'm sure Hindus in Mumbai (not Bombay) have had enough of jihadism that they would have learnt to not invite trouble and the inevitable islamic rioting.
But I'm guessing that if Abdul Kalam wanted to move in next door, they wouldn't have an issue.