Hindus in the past answered force with force. There's no point in people being foolishly chivalrous when it comes to the Total Wars of christoislamania. However, there's no need to descend to christoislamaniac gutters in speech/text (forget action).
I think the Indian armed forces should <b>shoot terrorists on sight, get every last one</b>. Never capture one to take it to trial, else it will turn out either like Afzal or the terrorists that India always hands over to TSP when blackmailed with hostages.
367:
It may be easy to utter horrible things in anger, but no human could act that way.
Contemplating such things, even in extreme unreasonable anger, will make ancestors cut off their familial bonds.
What christoterrorists (be it christosettlers in Americas, christoterrorists in Nagaland, catholic ustashe in Croatia, christonazis in Germany, ...) and islamiterrorists (Albanians, Chechens, islamaniacs in Kashmir and rest of India, ....) do to their victims has nothing to do with our behaviour. Christoislamaniacs behave like demons because they are possessed by terrorist mindvirus ideologies that make their minds cruel and inhuman.
We are not responsible that christoislamaniacs do not care about the extreme cruelties they inflict (just as they inflicted in the past) on others and their own - their non-existent gawd possessing their formerly-human minds goads them on to gore.
Karma is relentless, we create it naturally as a process of living. But every cruelty binds one further into the sort of Karma one does not want to know of. There's this line in the Gita - from memory, the idea is repeated more than once in it - that wrath makes one descend into utter darkness in subsequent lives, that such a creature is tossed from miserable life to more miserable life in the violent cycle of their thoughts and gets further and further away from Bhagavan. This is not a path anyone should encourage.
In meting out deserved justice to terrorist ideologies and terrorist orgs - something which must absolutely be done - there is no remote reason to stoop to their disgusting sadism, because then what such a person imagines they are protecting and preserving (be it nature, society, peace, humanity or Dharma) is actually defiling and further destroying it. Christoislamic behaviour from Dharmics in retaliation to christoislamania will certainly destroy Dharma. But so will inaction. The Gita always speaks of the necessity of Action. In this context it also goes over how war and death and killing are sometimes a necessary part of life; yet even as it explains these facts of existence, in the chapter on Gunas it explains how everything in life - including Action - is of the three kinds of Gunas (Sattva, Rajas and Tamas). And that the consequences of the three are wildly different. Right Action is required. What is not Right Action - that is, wrong action, action motivated by wrong reasons, and inaction when action is required - is Adharma. And adharma brings forth only more adharma. And that is as far away from what Hindus want for Bharatam/the world, other Hindus/Natural Traditionalists/all humanity, or for one's own individual person.
I don't know what this 'Right Action' is in this situation, but so far I have always held that it is exactly that which is necessary for us to win (only going that far), but never going beyond that. (That is, that anything more will descend into vendetta and is bad for everyone.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The site looks like a Muslim propaganda site<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's a catholic site. Catholics hate Orthodox Russia with a vengeance we (or perhaps it's only me, since everyone here seems to be know-it-alls) can barely fathom. Vatican's quasi-private 'moral' support for Chechen islamiterrorism seems almost on par with their more public support of Palestinian christoislamiterrorism and Vatican's negation of Israel.
I think the fact that that site is catholic needs to be taken into account.
I think the Indian armed forces should <b>shoot terrorists on sight, get every last one</b>. Never capture one to take it to trial, else it will turn out either like Afzal or the terrorists that India always hands over to TSP when blackmailed with hostages.
367:
It may be easy to utter horrible things in anger, but no human could act that way.
Contemplating such things, even in extreme unreasonable anger, will make ancestors cut off their familial bonds.
What christoterrorists (be it christosettlers in Americas, christoterrorists in Nagaland, catholic ustashe in Croatia, christonazis in Germany, ...) and islamiterrorists (Albanians, Chechens, islamaniacs in Kashmir and rest of India, ....) do to their victims has nothing to do with our behaviour. Christoislamaniacs behave like demons because they are possessed by terrorist mindvirus ideologies that make their minds cruel and inhuman.
We are not responsible that christoislamaniacs do not care about the extreme cruelties they inflict (just as they inflicted in the past) on others and their own - their non-existent gawd possessing their formerly-human minds goads them on to gore.
Karma is relentless, we create it naturally as a process of living. But every cruelty binds one further into the sort of Karma one does not want to know of. There's this line in the Gita - from memory, the idea is repeated more than once in it - that wrath makes one descend into utter darkness in subsequent lives, that such a creature is tossed from miserable life to more miserable life in the violent cycle of their thoughts and gets further and further away from Bhagavan. This is not a path anyone should encourage.
In meting out deserved justice to terrorist ideologies and terrorist orgs - something which must absolutely be done - there is no remote reason to stoop to their disgusting sadism, because then what such a person imagines they are protecting and preserving (be it nature, society, peace, humanity or Dharma) is actually defiling and further destroying it. Christoislamic behaviour from Dharmics in retaliation to christoislamania will certainly destroy Dharma. But so will inaction. The Gita always speaks of the necessity of Action. In this context it also goes over how war and death and killing are sometimes a necessary part of life; yet even as it explains these facts of existence, in the chapter on Gunas it explains how everything in life - including Action - is of the three kinds of Gunas (Sattva, Rajas and Tamas). And that the consequences of the three are wildly different. Right Action is required. What is not Right Action - that is, wrong action, action motivated by wrong reasons, and inaction when action is required - is Adharma. And adharma brings forth only more adharma. And that is as far away from what Hindus want for Bharatam/the world, other Hindus/Natural Traditionalists/all humanity, or for one's own individual person.
I don't know what this 'Right Action' is in this situation, but so far I have always held that it is exactly that which is necessary for us to win (only going that far), but never going beyond that. (That is, that anything more will descend into vendetta and is bad for everyone.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The site looks like a Muslim propaganda site<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's a catholic site. Catholics hate Orthodox Russia with a vengeance we (or perhaps it's only me, since everyone here seems to be know-it-alls) can barely fathom. Vatican's quasi-private 'moral' support for Chechen islamiterrorism seems almost on par with their more public support of Palestinian christoislamiterrorism and Vatican's negation of Israel.
I think the fact that that site is catholic needs to be taken into account.
Death to traitors.