Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 4

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->“Golwalkar, a founding member of the RSS, in a book that he wrote borrowed ideas from Hitler’s Nazism. His admiration for Hitler was well-known. He rejected the idea that India was a secular nation, and posited instead that it was a Hindu Rashtra (a Hindu system), which a great of influence over much of the Indian population.” But in a Hindu Rashtra there is no place for other religions. (Orissa Bishop is making false statements against Golwalkar Guruji. Only Hindus could form truly secular nation. Also on which basis, Bishop is saying that Guruji borrowed his ideas from Hitler? Rather Christians have used Nazi methods like Inquisition to convert non-Christians to Christianity, so they don't have right to talk such things about Hindus!)
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Nazism as political Christan fascism
Does this Christian fundamentalist calling himself a bishop really understand what he is saying? Hitler was a Christen and his Nazism was political Christian fascism. The first worst enemy of Judaism was Christianity, the second Islam, having inherited that attitude from early (Syriac) Christianity.
The Nazis had "Gott mit uns" or "God With Us" as belt bucket. And they also had the "Mutterkreuz" or Mother' Cross. Normally the Nazi cross (said to be based upon old Germanic symbols) has 4 sequal lengthy members, but this cross really is like a Christian cross! See all the intimate Nazi and Christian connections at:
http://www.nobeliefs.com/mementoes.htm and about Hitler and Christianity at: http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm by Jim Walker

Standard western (read: Christian) historical accounts did try very hard to disconnect fascism, of which Nazism is a German shape, from Christianity. Especially when racism and ethnic cleanings were part of it. The other shape is the Italian one of Mussolini. It is totalitarian Christian fascism in the very country of the totalitarian Roman catholic church. [the political system was somewhat adopted by the marxist-communists of Russia under Stalin]
Christianity has since it was adopted by the Roman emperor Constantine as state religion, repeatedly been on the foreground as a political belief, similar to its baby brother called Islam. Christianity waged religious wars against any other religion, execution (white wash too), conversion, imperialism all going hand-by-hand. Now, isn't that a clear sign of a political religious movement?

Christian churches and politics
This christian church, like all other, has been a political one, engaged in political affairs and imperialism. The European states in the middle ages and later, deeply rooted in christianity, were waging wars against each other based upon faith and imperialism: protestants versus catholics. Catholic rulers obeyed the Roman catholic church pope as leader, while the protestant movement was a break with Rome, and their leaders took the local ruling protestant church for their inspiration. The British king became the Anglican church pope!
Christianity gave rise to Totalitarianism of which the religious creation is the church, the political fascism, and its reactionary movement marxism. (Karl Friedrich Marx was a Jew - an Abrahamitic scion but in denial.)

Roman church and Fascism
This church was intimately connected with Itialian fascism of Benito Mussolini. On the 20th of December, 1926, the Pope declared that “Mussolini [was] the man sent by Providence.” The Lateran Treaties in 1929 were a multi-faceted, two-part religio-political agreement between the Vatican’s Holy See and the Italian Fascist government that guaranteed certain rights and privileges to each party.
Since 1861, with the unification of Italy and its subsequent disenfranchisement of the Church of the Papal States along with the separation of Church and state that came with the Liberal revolution, the Church had been vying desperately to reassert itself as the sole spiritual power in the land.
And where does Sonia Antonia Maino come from?

By law there was a separation of church and state, but in practical life, the church involvement with every issue was deeply felt upto the sixties of the 20th century. The European students revolution and the sex revolution in the sixties marked a considerable chance in attitue towards the church, a battle which the church lost in Europe, but not in the US. Now thay are gaining souls in a cheap manner in the third world, and particularly in India through the Mother Theresa's. (couldn't she liberate her fellow countrymen in Albania? It is hard to be a saint in your own country, it is easy to impress poor people with religious funds. Real humanity is giving Roti without pushing a 'holy' foreign book through one's throat)


The most formidable competitor of Islamic fascism is Christian fascism. It is by now clear that state and church are not always separated and that political christianity gives fascism of which racism and ethnic cleanings can be the consequences.
The Christian involvement in India is fascism (=political christianity in disguise). It is not 'liberation'of people, but it serves a twofold goal:
1. destroying heathenism, called Hinduism, and
2. competing with Islam for getting more converts to become the number one

The Abrahamitic fascist is like a Dracula seeking for fresh convert blood. Opponents may be destroyed as to form a Chele Kula or Tower of Skulls.

NOTE
Hinduism and fascism/nazism are two worlds apart! Fascism is political christianity!
The word "nationalism" as a 20th century invention should be properly understood. That word is drowned and soaked with the political phenomenon called fascism: Nazi political parties were called National Socialistic Democratic (Party). See here the combine with Socialistic: national aimed for political unification of 1 christian country, socialism aimed for having the support (=submission) of the common people (proletarian and agrarian)

Deshabhakti is not nationalism in the Euopean sense. Besides Hinduism is not imperialism, the other aspect connected with the word "nationalism", even though both were separated from each other after WWII, due to the rise of ideas like the UN. Deshabhakti is connected with defence, it is connected with protecting Mother India against agressors, invaders, traitors of the soil, imperialists, etc.

Pseudo-seculars and their foreign tutors and inspirers try hard to see indian civilization through Abrahamitic and Pseudo-Abrahamitic (marxist) glasses. But it is their interpretation from their Abrahamitic concepts. Indian civilization and her way of life are completely alien to the (Pseudo-Abrahamitic systems.