Why so glum?
Why should this treaty be taken as anything more than something which the unrepresentative christocongressi government signed with foreign christo governments elsewhere. And they did so without publicly presenting the details of their agreement earlier or even now.
Why then should it be binding on the nation (into the future, and under other governments)? Yes, US wants to keep congress in power in India and is doing everything to ensure that (supporting islamiterrorism in India in their media, helping other countries to buy up media in India for widening the net of their subversion, giving university chairs and associate professorships to their subversionist minions in India like communist Thapar and the Anganas, sending Kenneth Haywoods to aid SIMI and christoterrorist missionaries, telling their thoughtless converted sheep who to vote for, etcetera). US papers have even declared that Raoul Goonda is the "crown prince" of India, long before <i>democratic</i> India has even voted. One can only wonder how they know with such certainty who's going to be heading the country unless they plan to meddle, as always, in other countries' affairs.
But we can and should treat this accord with the same 'gravitas' that the ever-faithless christo-America showed toward its treaties with NA's native Americans: break it when and how we want to. Therefore, India should test when we want to. This piece of paper can meanwhile keep America and likeminded nations euphoric.
There is no dishonour in breaking deals with christoterrorist countries that have acted adharmicly towards others. There is only disgrace in entering agreements with such 'nations' in the first place, particularly if we do so with the intention to keep to our end of the bargain. MMS/his boss is representative of only the subversionists and the brainwashed - i.e. no one important - in India.
How much did Madmoron Stink pocket from his foreign masters for getting the job done for them?
Why should this treaty be taken as anything more than something which the unrepresentative christocongressi government signed with foreign christo governments elsewhere. And they did so without publicly presenting the details of their agreement earlier or even now.
Why then should it be binding on the nation (into the future, and under other governments)? Yes, US wants to keep congress in power in India and is doing everything to ensure that (supporting islamiterrorism in India in their media, helping other countries to buy up media in India for widening the net of their subversion, giving university chairs and associate professorships to their subversionist minions in India like communist Thapar and the Anganas, sending Kenneth Haywoods to aid SIMI and christoterrorist missionaries, telling their thoughtless converted sheep who to vote for, etcetera). US papers have even declared that Raoul Goonda is the "crown prince" of India, long before <i>democratic</i> India has even voted. One can only wonder how they know with such certainty who's going to be heading the country unless they plan to meddle, as always, in other countries' affairs.
But we can and should treat this accord with the same 'gravitas' that the ever-faithless christo-America showed toward its treaties with NA's native Americans: break it when and how we want to. Therefore, India should test when we want to. This piece of paper can meanwhile keep America and likeminded nations euphoric.
There is no dishonour in breaking deals with christoterrorist countries that have acted adharmicly towards others. There is only disgrace in entering agreements with such 'nations' in the first place, particularly if we do so with the intention to keep to our end of the bargain. MMS/his boss is representative of only the subversionists and the brainwashed - i.e. no one important - in India.
How much did Madmoron Stink pocket from his foreign masters for getting the job done for them?