When Hindus keep deflecting christianism's crimes by couching the threat under the word "missionaries" instead of its true name of christianism (as if missionaries were a separate 'evil entity' and christianism was innocent) they are
- doing a grave injustice to those terrorised and genocided by christos/christianism in the past
- doing a grave disservice to the people currently terrorised by christianism, by keeping them ignorant of *what* is actually threatening and attacking them, by obscuring the real enemy and thus making it hard for the more vulnerable Hindus to identify the true source of their misery.
Besides, *all* christians are commanded by the babble to spread the gospel - that is, to be missionaries. It is <i>christianism</i> that gives rise to christian terrorists - it is <i>christianism</i> that is (the root cause of) christoterrorism.
I make no apologies for pasting the following. As sick as these excerpts make me, and as sick as it will make everyone else, it deserves to be read by whoever makes it this far. Curious who (any lurker-apologists out there; not IF members, of course) will thereafter still find it conscionable to deflect the evil THAT IS christianism onto "missionaries" or "evanjehadis".
Many of the same Hindus who now finally dare say that islam is behind the largescale genocide and rape in Bharatam and other nations, and admit that it caused various other utterly inhuman acts against 'infidels', have the most curiously effective blinders on when it comes to the VERY SAME TERRORIST acts committed all through history by those other faithfuls: christians. People who can't see that christianism is the same as islam are wilfully blind.
<b>The following IS christianism:</b>
My inserts in purple.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080131215750/...olonialism.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->white (no, not "white" but rather faithful CHRISTIAN) men, who raped Native women at epidemic rates. Between 1851 and 1852, California spent over one million dollars hiring soldiers to exterminate Natives. In one typical expedition, a group of invading soldiers demanded that all the young women be given to them for sexual service. When they discovered that the young women had already managed to escape, the soldiers raped the old women instead. <b>Other accounts of colonial (=christian) sexual abuse include the following:</b>
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->When I was in the boat I captured a beautiful Carib woman. . .I conceived desire to take pleasure. . . .I took a rope and thrashed her well, for which she raised such unheard screams that you would not have believed your ears. Finally we came to an agreement in such a manner that I can tell you that she seemed to have been brought up in a school of harlots.
(^ This one must be the faithful christoterrorist Columbus because "In his own words, Columbus described how he himself "took [his] pleasure" with a native woman after whipping her "soundly" with a piece of rope. -- The Dark Side of Christian History, Helen Ellerbe")
Two of the best looking of the squaws were lying in such a position, and from the appearance of the genital organs and of their wounds, there can be no doubt that they were first ravished and then shot dead. Nearly all of the dead were mutilated.
One woman, big with child, rushed into the church, clasping the alter and crying for mercy for herself and unborn babe. She was followed, and fell pierced with a dozen lances. . . [T]he child was torn alive from the yet palpitating body of its mother, first plunged into the holy water to be baptized, and immediately its brains were dashed out against a wall.
(Just like Bertrand Russell said: "The [Catholic] Spaniards in Mexico and Peru used to baptize Indian infants and then immediately dash their brains out; by this means they secured that these infants went to heaven."
What would jeebusjehovallah do? Look in The Terrorist Manual known as Da Babble where the christoterrorist gawd dashes babies against rocks.)
The <b>Christians</b> attacked them with buffets and beatings. . . . Then they behaved with such temerity and shamelessness that the most powerful ruler of the island had to see his own wife raped by a <b>Christian</b> officer.
I heard one man say that he had cut a woman's private parts out, and had them for exhibition on a stick. . . . I also heard of numerous instances in which men had cut out the private parts of females, and stretched them over their saddle-bows and some of them over their hats.
The attitudes on display in the examples above have changed very little over the centuries. In 1982, a white man named Stuart Kasten marketed a video game called Custer's Revenge, in which players score points each time they, as Custer, rape an Indian woman. The gameâs slogan is, "When you score, you score." Kasten has deceptively described the game as "a fun sequence where the woman is enjoying a sexual act willingly."
In the Indian (christian) boarding schools of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, founded by the US government to prevent Indian women from passing on their language and culture to their children, physical and sexual abuse was rampant. Irene Mack Pyawasit recalls her days as a boarding school resident from the Menominee reservation:
The government employees that they put into the schools had families but still there were an awful lot of Indian girls turning up pregnant. Because the employees were having a lot of fun, and they would force a girl into a situation, and the girl wouldn't always be believed. Then, because she came up pregnant, she would be sent home in disgrace. Some boy would be blamed for it, never the government employee. He was always scot-free. And no matter what the girl said, she was never believed.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The high rates of alcoholism, violence, and suicide in Indian communities today can, in large part, be traced to the brutality of Indian boarding schools.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->^All that wasn't islam, that was christianism. But it's easy to confuse the two, since only the *names* of these two subcults of the Unified Cult of Terrorism are different.
Where did those wonderful christians get all this baby-murdering, raping and mutilating from? Oh, now let me see, this is just <i>such</i> a difficult question to answer. Eh, what's that? Le chretien dit: "The Babble told us to do it. It sets us the glorious example." Yes, listen to the cretin. It knows what it's talking about.
http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible5.htm - 4 babble translations, none of which are able to dress up this most gawdly statement to make it remotely palatable
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Happy To Kill Children</b>
"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Psalms 137:9, KJV)
"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones Against the rock." (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)
"Happy the man who shall seize and smash your little ones against the rock!" (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)
"a blessing on anyone who seizes your babies and shatters them against a rock!" (Psalms 137:9, Jerusalem Bible)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible3.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. <b>Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes</b>; their houses shall be spoiled, and <b>their wives ravished."</b> (Isaiah 13:15-16)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
While the loving followers of the loving non-existent jeebus were busy dashing the native American babies' brains out in obedience and imitation of their beloved jeebusjehovallah, they were hoping for even more native American babies to be born - obviously in order to dash out their brains as well (see below). Else the christians had nothing fun to do. Or they could let them grow up and then engage in that other christian pastime: "the use of dogs to hunt the Indians, the so-called "Spaniard's Method,". And 'Reverend Solomon Stoddard, one of New England's most esteemed religious leaders, in "1703 formally proposed to the Massachusetts Governor that the colonists be given the financial wherewithal to purchase and train large packs of dogs 'to hunt Indians as they do bears'."' (http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4a.htm - look for all occurrences of "dog".)
The following also shows yet more lewd christian behaviour from the sexually repressed christos (in blue below):
http://web.archive.org/web/20021211223945/...eo/mission.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->So, using armed Spanish troops, to capture Indians and herd them into the mission stockades, the Spanish padres did their best to convert the natives before they killed them.
And kill them they did... At the mission of Nuestra Señora de Loreto, reported the Franciscan chronicler Father Francisco Paloú, during the first three years of Franciscan rule 76 children and adults were baptized, while 131 were buried... The same held true at others, from the mission of Santa Rosaliá de Mulegé, with 48 baptisms and 113 deaths, to the mission of San Ignacio, with 115 baptisms and 293 deaths - all within the same initial three year period.
For some missions, such as those of San José del Cabo and Santiago de las Coras, no baptism or death statistics were reported, because there were so few survivors [...] that there was no reason for counting [...] And what was done was simply that they brought more natives in, under military force of arms.
In short, the missions were furnaces of death that sustained their Indian population levels for as long as they did only by driving more and more natives into their confines to compensate for the huge numbers who were being killed once they got there. [...] Thus for example, one survey of life and death in an early Arizona mission has turned up statistics showing that at one time an astonishing 93 percent of the children born within its walls died before the age of ten - and yet the mission's total population did not drastically decline. [SH136f]
There were various ways in which the mission Indians died. [...] The personal living space for Indians in the missions averaged about seven feet by two feet per person for unmarried captives, who were locked at night into sex-segregated common rooms that contained a single open pit for a toilet. It was perhaps a bit more space than was allotted a captive African in the hold of a slave ship sailing the Middle Passage. [...] Of course, the mission Indians also worked like slaves in the padres' agricultural fields, but they did so with far less than half the caloric intake, on average, commonly provided a black slave in Mississippi, Alabama, or Georgia. [SH138]
As one French visitor commented in the early nineteenth century, after inspecting life in the missions, the relationship between the priest and his flock "would ... be different only in name if a slaveholder kept them for labor and rented them out at will ..." But, we know now, he would have fed them better. [SH139]
The padres were also concerned about the continuing catastrophic decline in the number of babies born to their neophyte charges... here is a first-hand account of what happened at mission Santa Cruz when a holy and ascetic padre named Ramon Olbés came to the conclusion that one particular married couple was behaving with excessive sexual inhibition, thereby depriving him of another child to enslave and another soul to offer up to Christ:
   <!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->He [Father Olbés] sent for the husband and he asked him why his wife hadn't borne children... they brought an interpreter. This [one] repeated the question of the father to the Indian, who answered that he should ask God. The father asked through the interpreter if he slept with his wife, to which the Indian said yes. Then the father had them placed in a room together so that they would perform coitus in his presence. The Indian refused, but they forced him to show them his penis in order to affirm that he had it in good order... Fr. Olbés asked her if her husband slept with her, and she answered that, yes... He had her enter another room in order to examine her reproductive parts.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
At this point the woman resisted the padre's attempted forced inspection; for that impertinence she received fifty lashes, was "shackled, and locked in the nunnery." He then gave her a wooden doll and ordered her to carry it with her, "like a recently born child," wherever she went. [SH141]
There was, of course, good reason for the Indians to fear the consequences of running away and being caught:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Some of the run-away men were tied on sticks and beaten with straps. One chief was taken out to the open field and a young calf which had just died was skinned and the chief was sewed into the skin while it was yet warm. He was kept tied to a stake all day, but he died soon and they kept his corpse tied up.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[SH142]
D.E.Stannard, American Holocaust. Columbus and the Conquest of the New World, New York: Oxford University 1992.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->BY GAWD. I now see. It is the TRUE religion.
http://web.archive.org/web/20021211201514/...nstitution.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->George Washington in 1779 instructed his troops on how to deal with the Iroquois people:
   "...lay waste all the settlements around... that the country may not be merely overrun but destroyed," (and do not) "listen to any overture of peace before the total ruin of their settlements is effected."
Also in 1779 his General James Clinton wrote about the same natives:
   <b>"Bad as these savages are, they never violate the chastity of any woman,"</b>
and from his remark we also learn something about the conduct of the Christian soldiers.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->"the conduct of the Christian soldiers" <- At least the owner of the above Christian Heritage site is under no delusions on how it was merely some "missionaries" or "evanjehadis". Instead he calls them by their real name: christians, i.e. zombies nabbed by <b>christianism</b>. Meanwhile, Hindus insist on the very 'amicably' psecular blindness. Apparently because blindness will save us (?). It is not enough for some people that they should die of their own ignorance - no, they simply <i>must</i> shove their ignorance onto everyone else so that it may facilitate the christianist murder of all those others.
Contrast christian behaviour (all the above) - possessed as they are by their non-existent jeebusjehovallah - with the traditional native Americans guided by their Grand Spirit:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080131215750/...olonialism.html
via http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4a.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Though the Christians raped and tortured the Indian women, it was noted that the Native Americans did not do the same:
 # "I don't remember to have heard an instance of these savages offering to violate the chastity of any of the fair sex who had fallen into their hands." wrote the anonymous author of A Narrative of the Capture of Certain Americans at Westmoreland (1780)
 # Another anonymous writer, narrator of the battles of Trenton and Princeton, stated that British abuse of women had been "far Worse in this Respect than an Indian War, for I Never heard nor read of their Ravishing of Women ..."
 # Mary Rowlandson said of her own captivity: "I have been in the midst of roaring Lions, and Savage Bears, that feared neither God, nor Man, nor the Devil ... and yet not one of them ever offered the least abuse of unchastity to me in word or action."
 # William Apess (Pequot) asked in the 1800s, "Where, in the records of Indian barbarity, can we point to a violated female"?
 # Even Brigadier General James Clinton of the Continental Army said to his soldiers in 1779, as he sent them off to destroy the Iroquois nation, "Bad as the savages are, they never violate the chastity of any women, their prisoners."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->When Hindus merely blame "those missionaries" and thus shield christianism (which is the true cause of all this unspeakable evil), they are but continuing to stamp on the memory of the murdered native Americans, even as the zombie christians stamped on them in life.
Don't know why such Hindus then complain about "christianism's missionaries" terrorising Hindus when they won't SAY THAT IT IS CHRISTIANISM that terrorised all those other natural traditionalists.
Hindus need to Say it.
Anything less - when Hindus know the facts of christianism's history - *is* complicity. (Including complicity in christianism's murder of Swami Lakshmanananda Saraswati of Orissa. It's not just 'some christians' who killed him; it was christianism. It was premeditated. 8 or 9 times premeditated, though the very christian murder attempt only succeeded the final time. When therefore any Hindus continue to shield christianism - by obfuscating what is ultimately and solely to blame for all this - they are kicking the Swami. Such ingrate 'Hindus' never did deserve people like him.)
Meanwhile, look at the <b>very telling map of Africa which the Hellenes at ysee.gr have posted on their main page</b> at http://ysee.gr/ for the entry dated 15.8.2008
It shows Africa staked by the christo cross and bleeding into those regions wherever the cross has cut the continent. Picture = 1000 words. The cross doesn't have the word "missionary" on it. No, it's the plain <b>cross</b> and represents <b>christianism</b>.
The Traditional Greeks are still fighting against the terrorism of christianism, while many Hindus are happy to play the part of the self-deluded fool, roll over, declare christian victory and praise christoterrorism as a religion 'equal to' and alongside Hinduism. Thereby selling native Americans, the ancient Greco-Romans, all the old unconverted world (Africa, Asia, Europa, ...), our own victimised Hindu ancestors, current NE and Swami, their dignity and self-respect (and ours), just so they can cosy up to christianism. Yes, do let's cosy up to the cannibal.
- doing a grave injustice to those terrorised and genocided by christos/christianism in the past
- doing a grave disservice to the people currently terrorised by christianism, by keeping them ignorant of *what* is actually threatening and attacking them, by obscuring the real enemy and thus making it hard for the more vulnerable Hindus to identify the true source of their misery.
Besides, *all* christians are commanded by the babble to spread the gospel - that is, to be missionaries. It is <i>christianism</i> that gives rise to christian terrorists - it is <i>christianism</i> that is (the root cause of) christoterrorism.
I make no apologies for pasting the following. As sick as these excerpts make me, and as sick as it will make everyone else, it deserves to be read by whoever makes it this far. Curious who (any lurker-apologists out there; not IF members, of course) will thereafter still find it conscionable to deflect the evil THAT IS christianism onto "missionaries" or "evanjehadis".
Many of the same Hindus who now finally dare say that islam is behind the largescale genocide and rape in Bharatam and other nations, and admit that it caused various other utterly inhuman acts against 'infidels', have the most curiously effective blinders on when it comes to the VERY SAME TERRORIST acts committed all through history by those other faithfuls: christians. People who can't see that christianism is the same as islam are wilfully blind.
<b>The following IS christianism:</b>
My inserts in purple.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080131215750/...olonialism.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->white (no, not "white" but rather faithful CHRISTIAN) men, who raped Native women at epidemic rates. Between 1851 and 1852, California spent over one million dollars hiring soldiers to exterminate Natives. In one typical expedition, a group of invading soldiers demanded that all the young women be given to them for sexual service. When they discovered that the young women had already managed to escape, the soldiers raped the old women instead. <b>Other accounts of colonial (=christian) sexual abuse include the following:</b>
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->When I was in the boat I captured a beautiful Carib woman. . .I conceived desire to take pleasure. . . .I took a rope and thrashed her well, for which she raised such unheard screams that you would not have believed your ears. Finally we came to an agreement in such a manner that I can tell you that she seemed to have been brought up in a school of harlots.
(^ This one must be the faithful christoterrorist Columbus because "In his own words, Columbus described how he himself "took [his] pleasure" with a native woman after whipping her "soundly" with a piece of rope. -- The Dark Side of Christian History, Helen Ellerbe")
Two of the best looking of the squaws were lying in such a position, and from the appearance of the genital organs and of their wounds, there can be no doubt that they were first ravished and then shot dead. Nearly all of the dead were mutilated.
One woman, big with child, rushed into the church, clasping the alter and crying for mercy for herself and unborn babe. She was followed, and fell pierced with a dozen lances. . . [T]he child was torn alive from the yet palpitating body of its mother, first plunged into the holy water to be baptized, and immediately its brains were dashed out against a wall.
(Just like Bertrand Russell said: "The [Catholic] Spaniards in Mexico and Peru used to baptize Indian infants and then immediately dash their brains out; by this means they secured that these infants went to heaven."
What would jeebusjehovallah do? Look in The Terrorist Manual known as Da Babble where the christoterrorist gawd dashes babies against rocks.)
The <b>Christians</b> attacked them with buffets and beatings. . . . Then they behaved with such temerity and shamelessness that the most powerful ruler of the island had to see his own wife raped by a <b>Christian</b> officer.
I heard one man say that he had cut a woman's private parts out, and had them for exhibition on a stick. . . . I also heard of numerous instances in which men had cut out the private parts of females, and stretched them over their saddle-bows and some of them over their hats.
The attitudes on display in the examples above have changed very little over the centuries. In 1982, a white man named Stuart Kasten marketed a video game called Custer's Revenge, in which players score points each time they, as Custer, rape an Indian woman. The gameâs slogan is, "When you score, you score." Kasten has deceptively described the game as "a fun sequence where the woman is enjoying a sexual act willingly."
In the Indian (christian) boarding schools of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, founded by the US government to prevent Indian women from passing on their language and culture to their children, physical and sexual abuse was rampant. Irene Mack Pyawasit recalls her days as a boarding school resident from the Menominee reservation:
The government employees that they put into the schools had families but still there were an awful lot of Indian girls turning up pregnant. Because the employees were having a lot of fun, and they would force a girl into a situation, and the girl wouldn't always be believed. Then, because she came up pregnant, she would be sent home in disgrace. Some boy would be blamed for it, never the government employee. He was always scot-free. And no matter what the girl said, she was never believed.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The high rates of alcoholism, violence, and suicide in Indian communities today can, in large part, be traced to the brutality of Indian boarding schools.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->^All that wasn't islam, that was christianism. But it's easy to confuse the two, since only the *names* of these two subcults of the Unified Cult of Terrorism are different.
Where did those wonderful christians get all this baby-murdering, raping and mutilating from? Oh, now let me see, this is just <i>such</i> a difficult question to answer. Eh, what's that? Le chretien dit: "The Babble told us to do it. It sets us the glorious example." Yes, listen to the cretin. It knows what it's talking about.
http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible5.htm - 4 babble translations, none of which are able to dress up this most gawdly statement to make it remotely palatable
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Happy To Kill Children</b>
"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Psalms 137:9, KJV)
"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones Against the rock." (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)
"Happy the man who shall seize and smash your little ones against the rock!" (Psalms 137:9, New American Bible)
"a blessing on anyone who seizes your babies and shatters them against a rock!" (Psalms 137:9, Jerusalem Bible)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible3.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. <b>Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes</b>; their houses shall be spoiled, and <b>their wives ravished."</b> (Isaiah 13:15-16)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
While the loving followers of the loving non-existent jeebus were busy dashing the native American babies' brains out in obedience and imitation of their beloved jeebusjehovallah, they were hoping for even more native American babies to be born - obviously in order to dash out their brains as well (see below). Else the christians had nothing fun to do. Or they could let them grow up and then engage in that other christian pastime: "the use of dogs to hunt the Indians, the so-called "Spaniard's Method,". And 'Reverend Solomon Stoddard, one of New England's most esteemed religious leaders, in "1703 formally proposed to the Massachusetts Governor that the colonists be given the financial wherewithal to purchase and train large packs of dogs 'to hunt Indians as they do bears'."' (http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4a.htm - look for all occurrences of "dog".)
The following also shows yet more lewd christian behaviour from the sexually repressed christos (in blue below):
http://web.archive.org/web/20021211223945/...eo/mission.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->So, using armed Spanish troops, to capture Indians and herd them into the mission stockades, the Spanish padres did their best to convert the natives before they killed them.
And kill them they did... At the mission of Nuestra Señora de Loreto, reported the Franciscan chronicler Father Francisco Paloú, during the first three years of Franciscan rule 76 children and adults were baptized, while 131 were buried... The same held true at others, from the mission of Santa Rosaliá de Mulegé, with 48 baptisms and 113 deaths, to the mission of San Ignacio, with 115 baptisms and 293 deaths - all within the same initial three year period.
For some missions, such as those of San José del Cabo and Santiago de las Coras, no baptism or death statistics were reported, because there were so few survivors [...] that there was no reason for counting [...] And what was done was simply that they brought more natives in, under military force of arms.
In short, the missions were furnaces of death that sustained their Indian population levels for as long as they did only by driving more and more natives into their confines to compensate for the huge numbers who were being killed once they got there. [...] Thus for example, one survey of life and death in an early Arizona mission has turned up statistics showing that at one time an astonishing 93 percent of the children born within its walls died before the age of ten - and yet the mission's total population did not drastically decline. [SH136f]
There were various ways in which the mission Indians died. [...] The personal living space for Indians in the missions averaged about seven feet by two feet per person for unmarried captives, who were locked at night into sex-segregated common rooms that contained a single open pit for a toilet. It was perhaps a bit more space than was allotted a captive African in the hold of a slave ship sailing the Middle Passage. [...] Of course, the mission Indians also worked like slaves in the padres' agricultural fields, but they did so with far less than half the caloric intake, on average, commonly provided a black slave in Mississippi, Alabama, or Georgia. [SH138]
As one French visitor commented in the early nineteenth century, after inspecting life in the missions, the relationship between the priest and his flock "would ... be different only in name if a slaveholder kept them for labor and rented them out at will ..." But, we know now, he would have fed them better. [SH139]
The padres were also concerned about the continuing catastrophic decline in the number of babies born to their neophyte charges... here is a first-hand account of what happened at mission Santa Cruz when a holy and ascetic padre named Ramon Olbés came to the conclusion that one particular married couple was behaving with excessive sexual inhibition, thereby depriving him of another child to enslave and another soul to offer up to Christ:
   <!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->He [Father Olbés] sent for the husband and he asked him why his wife hadn't borne children... they brought an interpreter. This [one] repeated the question of the father to the Indian, who answered that he should ask God. The father asked through the interpreter if he slept with his wife, to which the Indian said yes. Then the father had them placed in a room together so that they would perform coitus in his presence. The Indian refused, but they forced him to show them his penis in order to affirm that he had it in good order... Fr. Olbés asked her if her husband slept with her, and she answered that, yes... He had her enter another room in order to examine her reproductive parts.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
At this point the woman resisted the padre's attempted forced inspection; for that impertinence she received fifty lashes, was "shackled, and locked in the nunnery." He then gave her a wooden doll and ordered her to carry it with her, "like a recently born child," wherever she went. [SH141]
There was, of course, good reason for the Indians to fear the consequences of running away and being caught:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Some of the run-away men were tied on sticks and beaten with straps. One chief was taken out to the open field and a young calf which had just died was skinned and the chief was sewed into the skin while it was yet warm. He was kept tied to a stake all day, but he died soon and they kept his corpse tied up.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[SH142]
D.E.Stannard, American Holocaust. Columbus and the Conquest of the New World, New York: Oxford University 1992.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->BY GAWD. I now see. It is the TRUE religion.
http://web.archive.org/web/20021211201514/...nstitution.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->George Washington in 1779 instructed his troops on how to deal with the Iroquois people:
   "...lay waste all the settlements around... that the country may not be merely overrun but destroyed," (and do not) "listen to any overture of peace before the total ruin of their settlements is effected."
Also in 1779 his General James Clinton wrote about the same natives:
   <b>"Bad as these savages are, they never violate the chastity of any woman,"</b>
and from his remark we also learn something about the conduct of the Christian soldiers.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->"the conduct of the Christian soldiers" <- At least the owner of the above Christian Heritage site is under no delusions on how it was merely some "missionaries" or "evanjehadis". Instead he calls them by their real name: christians, i.e. zombies nabbed by <b>christianism</b>. Meanwhile, Hindus insist on the very 'amicably' psecular blindness. Apparently because blindness will save us (?). It is not enough for some people that they should die of their own ignorance - no, they simply <i>must</i> shove their ignorance onto everyone else so that it may facilitate the christianist murder of all those others.
Contrast christian behaviour (all the above) - possessed as they are by their non-existent jeebusjehovallah - with the traditional native Americans guided by their Grand Spirit:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080131215750/...olonialism.html
via http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4a.htm
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Though the Christians raped and tortured the Indian women, it was noted that the Native Americans did not do the same:
 # "I don't remember to have heard an instance of these savages offering to violate the chastity of any of the fair sex who had fallen into their hands." wrote the anonymous author of A Narrative of the Capture of Certain Americans at Westmoreland (1780)
 # Another anonymous writer, narrator of the battles of Trenton and Princeton, stated that British abuse of women had been "far Worse in this Respect than an Indian War, for I Never heard nor read of their Ravishing of Women ..."
 # Mary Rowlandson said of her own captivity: "I have been in the midst of roaring Lions, and Savage Bears, that feared neither God, nor Man, nor the Devil ... and yet not one of them ever offered the least abuse of unchastity to me in word or action."
 # William Apess (Pequot) asked in the 1800s, "Where, in the records of Indian barbarity, can we point to a violated female"?
 # Even Brigadier General James Clinton of the Continental Army said to his soldiers in 1779, as he sent them off to destroy the Iroquois nation, "Bad as the savages are, they never violate the chastity of any women, their prisoners."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->When Hindus merely blame "those missionaries" and thus shield christianism (which is the true cause of all this unspeakable evil), they are but continuing to stamp on the memory of the murdered native Americans, even as the zombie christians stamped on them in life.
Don't know why such Hindus then complain about "christianism's missionaries" terrorising Hindus when they won't SAY THAT IT IS CHRISTIANISM that terrorised all those other natural traditionalists.
Hindus need to Say it.
Anything less - when Hindus know the facts of christianism's history - *is* complicity. (Including complicity in christianism's murder of Swami Lakshmanananda Saraswati of Orissa. It's not just 'some christians' who killed him; it was christianism. It was premeditated. 8 or 9 times premeditated, though the very christian murder attempt only succeeded the final time. When therefore any Hindus continue to shield christianism - by obfuscating what is ultimately and solely to blame for all this - they are kicking the Swami. Such ingrate 'Hindus' never did deserve people like him.)
Meanwhile, look at the <b>very telling map of Africa which the Hellenes at ysee.gr have posted on their main page</b> at http://ysee.gr/ for the entry dated 15.8.2008
It shows Africa staked by the christo cross and bleeding into those regions wherever the cross has cut the continent. Picture = 1000 words. The cross doesn't have the word "missionary" on it. No, it's the plain <b>cross</b> and represents <b>christianism</b>.
The Traditional Greeks are still fighting against the terrorism of christianism, while many Hindus are happy to play the part of the self-deluded fool, roll over, declare christian victory and praise christoterrorism as a religion 'equal to' and alongside Hinduism. Thereby selling native Americans, the ancient Greco-Romans, all the old unconverted world (Africa, Asia, Europa, ...), our own victimised Hindu ancestors, current NE and Swami, their dignity and self-respect (and ours), just so they can cosy up to christianism. Yes, do let's cosy up to the cannibal.