Christian Subversion And Missionary Activities - 5

[Husky]

<

I think this is called sequential spamming, or else I'm coining the phrase now.

Three totally different things.

1. <!--QuoteBegin-k.ram+Oct 15 2008, 07:33 AM-->QUOTE(k.ram @ Oct 15 2008, 07:33 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Christians, SC/STs uphold conversion as constitutional right</b>
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Taking away the right to convert will have grave consequences," said noted Christian leader John Dayal, who is a member of the National Integration Council.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->[right][snapback]89152[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Missed something interesting in there about John Dayal, which I wasn't aware of:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"How can you stop from listening to your conscience? <b>I was a Christian, then a non-believer Marxist for 25 years and now I am Christian again," said Dayal</b>, on the occasion of World Religious Freedom Day, and called for a ban on saffron groups like VHP and Bajrang Dal.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->By osmosis, the christo-conditioned keep moving from christianism to communism and back, because it's the same religion. The ultimate destination of communism in Asia is intended to be christianism.

Wonder how many of the christomaoist goons hired by the christoterrorists of Kandhamal are contacts of John Dayal from his days as a marxist? Or was he only a communist 'philosopher' and not an active footsoldier then? (Also, what shade of christocommunism was he in his days working as a 'journalist' for Mid-Day?)

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->(John Dayal) called for a ban on saffron groups like VHP and Bajrang Dal<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Oh yeah? Well, I call for a total ban <i>on all</i> of christoislamicommunazism <i>for all time</i>. They've killed enough people. Everyone else knows that they're nothing more than massive, long-running terrorist cells. So Dayal can just go to prison already.


2. http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/10/mor...so-keen-on.html
Rajeev is simultaneously funny and right:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Monday, October 06, 2008
<b>more al-taqiya: Why Maoists so keen on owning up?</b>
oct 6th, 2008

must be because the checks from the vatican and the baptists were just encashed.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Girish <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Girish then refers to
ExpressBuzz
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->ENS First Published : 06 Oct 2008 10:28:00 AM ISTLast Updated : 06 Oct 2008 10:33:09 AM ISTBHUBANESWAR: Why are the Maoists so insistent on shouldering responsibility of Swami Lakshamanananda Saraswati’s killing? That too after releasing three letters to media during last one month claiming their role in the murder.

Weird as it may sound, but by ‘repeating’ their claim to a select media group Saturday through an interview by a leader of their State chapter that they were behind the August 23 killing has created more suspicion about their intention.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->BV's earlier post 367 with refs to news articles from The Chindu:
- first "Maoists deny role in VHP leader’s murder" (end Aug)
- and then, around a month thereafter (start Oct) - almost the same length of time as elapsed between the nun having been allegedly raped and it being brought out - the Maoists admitted to more:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->prominent Maoist leader has said there was reportedly pressure from both Christians and Dalits to eliminate VHP leader Laxmanananda Saraswati.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->All this dilly-dallying is on purpose: to create confusion in the minds of onlookers/Indian population and to distract from the murder of the Swami and to turn this situation of the blatant christian terrorism against Hinduism into an international drama of victimhood centred on the 'Hindu persecution of christians'. Christos are just trying to pull a Godhra. Next they'll say the Swami killed himself (they've already done the preparation for this with John Dayal declaring that Swami Lakshmanananda had it coming). Christoislamic lying is all the same. Always the same.


3. Christian appropriation of Hindus' experiential description of Hindu Dharma for christoterrorism:
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2005/12/31/fra...on-conversions/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Dr Francois Gautier seems like a lost man…very confused, He neither understand Christainity, hinduism, India or the West.Alas… how sad a man like him is deceived. No one becomes a Follower Of Christ (Christian) by being born in a so called Chritian family.. and catholics themselves are whole lot of blinded peopel. Christianilty isn’t a west religious but an eastern, and it is <b>off course not a religion, in a sense that other religion of the world’s are! Christianilty is a Life Style, Way Of Life.. A Christian live it every moment.</b> If a so called Christian does live it then he/she is a liar - therefore not a Christian, for CHRIST JESUS does not lie, so do His true Followers!..

Comment by A_shiva | February 2, 2008<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Fortunately, someone set that looney christo (with the Hindu name) straight:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I think A_shiva is the lost man. Christianity is a religion not a way of life because, Christianity doesn’t allow if live the same way of life without preying Jesus Christ. <b>And he has blatantly copied the definition of sanathan dharma, very similar to the kerala church priest who uses all sanskrit words and hindu practices in Church to benefit conversion.</b> Everything is a religion except Sanathan Dharma. The simple reason is Sanathan Dharma existed when there was nothing called religion and when no religion existed.

Comment by Nanda | April 1, 2008<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Don't agree entirely with this last, in that other traditions - like Hellenismos, native American traditions, Shinto - are also ways of life, it's not just Sanatana Dharma.