10-27-2008, 12:54 AM
http://www.twocircles.net/2008oct21/indian...l#comment-11451
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Hindus and minorities in India
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on 22 October 2008 - 12:37pm.
In the U.S. the African Americans are 12%.
Do we see the majority, the whites, talking as if the country's future depended on the 12 % ?
Would we see an article similar to this in an American newspaper ?
No, the majority in the U.S. has confidence in its abilities. So the question is why the Hindus do not have confidence in their abilities.
The reason of course is that the Hindus are not capable of leading India, and this is becoming amply clear.
Earlier, I thought that the Hindus had the capabilities because they had leaders of stature like Nehru and Gandhi.
However, the progressive rot of the last 20 years due to the rise of Hindu communalism has led me to re-evaluate the situation.
First, the communalism and threats of the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha in the 1920s, led to the Muslims demanding a separate nation. Even the best Hindus like Gandhi and Nehru could not avert the consequences sown by the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha.
That Hindu penchant for disintegration continues. The Sangh parivar has multiplied like a hydra - now besides the parent RSS, there is VHP, Shiv sena, Bajrang Dal and many others of the same ilk. And with them further disintegration of the concept of India has occurred.
Kashmir wants to separate. The same with the NE and Assam. And now these fascist Hindus have sown mistrust and hatred between Hindus and Muslims, Christians and Sikhs, in the heartland of India.
So the question is 'Why are Hindus like this ?'.
In my analysis, fragmentation is a natural Hindu mentality that arises from the caste concept.
Before we can build a modern India, we need to lay the correct foundations.
If Hinduism's fragmentation mentality can be reformed, let this happen. Otherwise, Hindus must be recommended to convert.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Hindus and minorities in India
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on 22 October 2008 - 12:37pm.
In the U.S. the African Americans are 12%.
Do we see the majority, the whites, talking as if the country's future depended on the 12 % ?
Would we see an article similar to this in an American newspaper ?
No, the majority in the U.S. has confidence in its abilities. So the question is why the Hindus do not have confidence in their abilities.
The reason of course is that the Hindus are not capable of leading India, and this is becoming amply clear.
Earlier, I thought that the Hindus had the capabilities because they had leaders of stature like Nehru and Gandhi.
However, the progressive rot of the last 20 years due to the rise of Hindu communalism has led me to re-evaluate the situation.
First, the communalism and threats of the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha in the 1920s, led to the Muslims demanding a separate nation. Even the best Hindus like Gandhi and Nehru could not avert the consequences sown by the RSS and Hindu Mahasabha.
That Hindu penchant for disintegration continues. The Sangh parivar has multiplied like a hydra - now besides the parent RSS, there is VHP, Shiv sena, Bajrang Dal and many others of the same ilk. And with them further disintegration of the concept of India has occurred.
Kashmir wants to separate. The same with the NE and Assam. And now these fascist Hindus have sown mistrust and hatred between Hindus and Muslims, Christians and Sikhs, in the heartland of India.
So the question is 'Why are Hindus like this ?'.
In my analysis, fragmentation is a natural Hindu mentality that arises from the caste concept.
Before we can build a modern India, we need to lay the correct foundations.
If Hinduism's fragmentation mentality can be reformed, let this happen. Otherwise, Hindus must be recommended to convert.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->