Destruction Of Hindu Culture From India

Naresh · 11-03-2008, 02:31 AM

<b>Husky Ji :</b>

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)Didn't you notice that for months now (8 or 9 months?) I've had nothing to contribute - IIRC, mine's all been opinionated posts zapping IF bandwidth. I actually don't remember what I wrote before that period - possibly more of the same... (Amnesia serves me well now.)
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


Really?

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)The cause is christoislamism, communism, psecularism, foreign meddling... Do you mean I refuse to offer solutions? That's because I don't know of any. I'm not Brain. I'm not even as clever as the other labrat. I try to avoid thinking most of the time - was never good at it, not my thing. Hence, not your man for a plan.
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


I concur that thinking is alien to you. One does not expect you to offer solution. One is only suggesting that it would be more pertinent if you were to address the Cause and find ways of counteracting the Cause.

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)I've been taking personal revenge for every single instance of anti-Hindu rhetoric I've come across on the web and in books. I'm not there yet. I will go on until I've cleared it. Then I may return to using 'christianism' and 'islamism' instead. Although 'christoislamiterrorism' is actually appropriately descriptive (number of humans it has murdered: beyond our capabilities to contemplate).
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


One would suggest that this Esteemed Forum be used in a constructive manner for the common weal rather than personal revenge.

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)I agree with you about the terrorism. But why are we not allowed to do reconversions in our lands - in case that is what you mean with 'proselytizing'?
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


Re-Conversion : I have nothing against a Non-Hindu wanting to Convert to Hinduism - more power to the Person. What I am against is âto do re-conversionâ at the âre-converterâsâ behest. IOW Conversion or Re-Conversion should be of the Person wanting same.

Proselytising : It means to make or try to make converts. This is converting either by force or by guile.

Until the Nineteenth Century Christianity usually converted by force - if not physical means then at least by creating circumstances which left the person to be converted no choice.

Today the Christian Proselytisers Convert mainly by guile - Monetary Incentives etc.

The reasons, IMO, for the Christians tying to convert all and sundry is due to the fact that Christianity receding (for want of a better word) in the Occident.

Thus in the need of "Bigger Battalions" the Christians are Proselytising in Asia and Africa. An Example : In Great Britain there are about One Million Christians (total population content over 95%) regularly attending Church which figure is far less in comparison with Muslims (about 2% population content) who regularly attend Mosques.

Islam is still using Force to Convert Non-Muslims especially in Muslim Majority Countries and guile - including of course Monetary benefits - in Non-Muslim Majority Countries.

In India there is far less conversion to Islam in comparison with conversion to Christianity.

The huge increase, in terms of proportions, of the Muslim Population Content in India is due to the over Forty Million Bangladeshi Muslim Illegal Immigrants and possibly over Twenty Million Illegal Pakistani Muslim Immigrants into India in the last Forty Years or so.

This is what must be addressed rather than whining and whinging about Conversion which though substantial is only minuscule in numbers as compared to the Illegal Immigration of Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh.

This Illegal Muslim Immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh is also by way of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis visiting India with an "Indian Visit Visa" and then, in Tens of Thousands Annually, not returning to their Terroristan and Bhookhananga Desh respectively.

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)Hey, I don't actually attack people unless I dislike their character or one or more of their primary qualities.

I didn't do that to you, because as I recall, there's been nothing that you've said (that I've read) that offended me.
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


One does not feel the need of attack as there are many ways of killing a cat than âstrangling it by the neckâ.

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)Arrogance (sense of superiority), cowardice, psecularism/equal-equalism/anti-Hindu 'Hindus', a meanness/pettyness of character and certain other things offend me. Deeply. I despise these qualities, and I hate to see them in those professing Hindu Dharma. No greater turn-off. Though I may not always say what I dislike about someone, one can obviously tell I dislike them - for whatever undeclared reason - if I start flaming in my usual manner. I don't usually bother telling such characters why I can't stand them (are they worth it? <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /> ) There. You know more about me now than before I blabbed it - though I always thought I was ultra-transparent, but apparently I'm not?

In a normal dialogue one feels that nobody has the prerogative of âFlamingâ as the same is not necessary. One should be able to puts oneâs views across without resorting to âUn-gentlemanlyâ conduct bordering on the Uncouth.

QUOTE(Husky @ Nov 2 2008, 06:00 PM)But can I ask what your post has to do with the transcript of Rajan's video, since that seems to be the last post I made on this thread? Am seriously at a loss...
[right][snapback]89712[/snapback][/right]


I see no evidence in my Message Posted Yesterday, 02-11-2008 at 04:52 PM of having alluded to Rajanâs Video.

Prithee, let me know what makes you think so!

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Login




Remember me Lost Password?