We shall not cease:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->For the moment, relevant to my concerns is the conception of rights prevalent in the tradition of the natural rights theories. Very broadly speaking, there are two ways in which rights are conceptualized: as âpassiveâ and as âactiveâ rights. Both these ways of conceptualizing rights, if not their names, are as old as the doctrines of natural rights themselves: anywhere between five to six hundred years old. <b>(It is even older than that, if one takes Roman Laws of Property into consideration.)</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->For the moment, relevant to my concerns is the conception of rights prevalent in the tradition of the natural rights theories. Very broadly speaking, there are two ways in which rights are conceptualized: as âpassiveâ and as âactiveâ rights. Both these ways of conceptualizing rights, if not their names, are as old as the doctrines of natural rights themselves: anywhere between five to six hundred years old. <b>(It is even older than that, if one takes Roman Laws of Property into consideration.)</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->