Some related stuff:
(1) http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/11/wha...-diversity.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>What Genetics can say about the diversity of Indians, and refutation of the Aryans coming from overseas</b>
nov 8th, 2008
michel danino has written a survey of recent genetic research, which seems to comprehensively reject the aryan invasion theory, and alas, even my copyrighted aryan tourist theory.
(But I wanted to make money off these aryan tourists.... Then again, try as I might, I've never seen any, so it's no loss.)
unfortunately, michel has asked that this not be circulated without his permission. it appeared in the bulletin of the indian archaeological society in 2006. here is an excerpt from the conclusions.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->See at link.
(2) http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/10/asia/tribal.php
<b>India's Aborigines?</b>
The IHT (European-based sister to NYT) has a piece on adivasis, calling them India's Aborigines.
Gee, I didn't realize that the rest of us weren't native to India. How glad I am that the NYT/IHT have enlightened me by informing me that I come from nowhere, since as a non-adivasi I can't possibly be native to Indian soil. The Atlanticists never seem to quit expanding their revisionism. The more India rises, the more feverishly they seem to pick at it.
Posted by san at 11/10/2008 03:44:00 PM 2 comments <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Well, neither kind of WASPCy is native to the soil they're in now.
Picts are the aboriginal Brits and they were persecuted and genocided by every other invader to the British Isles: the Celts, the Romans, and the Vikings (and IIRC, the Anglo-Saxons too).
According to the IE fantasy all invaders of Britain invaded there way later than any of the ancient <i>alleged</i> 'non-aboriginals' (the oryans-dravidiods) allegedly moved into India. So invader Brits ought to get out of the Isles. It's Pict land. Only Stephen Oppenheimer's unOryan ancestry for many British can save them now. (Which will IHT choose: unOryanness or Get Out of Britain?)
And christosettlers in the Americas (WASPCies, SW European Catholics et al) need to get lost from the Stolen Continent. It's an indisputable fact that the native Americans are the true and only inhabitants of the Americas. European christosettlers in the US are proven invaders and of proven genocider stock.
Meanwhile, none of this has any bearing on Hindus. For all the christian whining against us, they've still been entirely unable to prove us to be non-indigenous to our mother (Bharatam). Girijan Hindus are indigenous to Bharatam as are all other kinds of ethnically Indian Hindus. We're all the aborigines of Bharatam. Christos in IHT behave like christomedia in India: hurling accusations against Hindus but never giving any evidence. Someone should sue them to get them to <i>prove</i> the AIT and the Dravidian theory and the Adivasi theory and oh yeah, the IE theory.
About the IHT, www.ihtinfo.com/pages/ab_about.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Established in Paris in 1887, today the IHT is owned by The New York Times Company and continues to expand the reach of its authoritative journalism through the newspaper which is sold in 180 countries and via computers and mobile devices at IHT.com.
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT), a leading media company with 2007 revenues of $3.2 billion, includes The New York Times, the International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe, 15 other daily newspapers, WQXR-FM and more than 50 web sites, including NYTimes.com, Boston.com and <b>About.com</b>. The Company's core purpose is to enhance society by creating, collecting and distributing high-quality news, information and entertainment.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(1) http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/11/wha...-diversity.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>What Genetics can say about the diversity of Indians, and refutation of the Aryans coming from overseas</b>
nov 8th, 2008
michel danino has written a survey of recent genetic research, which seems to comprehensively reject the aryan invasion theory, and alas, even my copyrighted aryan tourist theory.
(But I wanted to make money off these aryan tourists.... Then again, try as I might, I've never seen any, so it's no loss.)
unfortunately, michel has asked that this not be circulated without his permission. it appeared in the bulletin of the indian archaeological society in 2006. here is an excerpt from the conclusions.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->See at link.
(2) http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/10/asia/tribal.php
<b>India's Aborigines?</b>
The IHT (European-based sister to NYT) has a piece on adivasis, calling them India's Aborigines.
Gee, I didn't realize that the rest of us weren't native to India. How glad I am that the NYT/IHT have enlightened me by informing me that I come from nowhere, since as a non-adivasi I can't possibly be native to Indian soil. The Atlanticists never seem to quit expanding their revisionism. The more India rises, the more feverishly they seem to pick at it.
Posted by san at 11/10/2008 03:44:00 PM 2 comments <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Well, neither kind of WASPCy is native to the soil they're in now.
Picts are the aboriginal Brits and they were persecuted and genocided by every other invader to the British Isles: the Celts, the Romans, and the Vikings (and IIRC, the Anglo-Saxons too).
According to the IE fantasy all invaders of Britain invaded there way later than any of the ancient <i>alleged</i> 'non-aboriginals' (the oryans-dravidiods) allegedly moved into India. So invader Brits ought to get out of the Isles. It's Pict land. Only Stephen Oppenheimer's unOryan ancestry for many British can save them now. (Which will IHT choose: unOryanness or Get Out of Britain?)
And christosettlers in the Americas (WASPCies, SW European Catholics et al) need to get lost from the Stolen Continent. It's an indisputable fact that the native Americans are the true and only inhabitants of the Americas. European christosettlers in the US are proven invaders and of proven genocider stock.
Meanwhile, none of this has any bearing on Hindus. For all the christian whining against us, they've still been entirely unable to prove us to be non-indigenous to our mother (Bharatam). Girijan Hindus are indigenous to Bharatam as are all other kinds of ethnically Indian Hindus. We're all the aborigines of Bharatam. Christos in IHT behave like christomedia in India: hurling accusations against Hindus but never giving any evidence. Someone should sue them to get them to <i>prove</i> the AIT and the Dravidian theory and the Adivasi theory and oh yeah, the IE theory.
About the IHT, www.ihtinfo.com/pages/ab_about.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Established in Paris in 1887, today the IHT is owned by The New York Times Company and continues to expand the reach of its authoritative journalism through the newspaper which is sold in 180 countries and via computers and mobile devices at IHT.com.
The New York Times Company (NYSE: NYT), a leading media company with 2007 revenues of $3.2 billion, includes The New York Times, the International Herald Tribune, The Boston Globe, 15 other daily newspapers, WQXR-FM and more than 50 web sites, including NYTimes.com, Boston.com and <b>About.com</b>. The Company's core purpose is to enhance society by creating, collecting and distributing high-quality news, information and entertainment.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Death to traitors.