10-19-2003, 07:46 PM
crossposted from Bharatnirbhaya - posted by Pramod Kumar
Howlers on Ayodhya
Here is another addition to the list of absurd, boring & secular analysis of the ASI report on Ayodhya. Some amusing excerpts are reproduced here. Not a single photo from the report has been published, only "artist's
impressions" of ancient pottery! For fear of letting the cat out of the bag?
------------
Cover story
The unknown Ayodhya
Oct 19, 2003.
The Week
[url="http://www.the-week.com/"]http://www.the-week.com/[/url]
By R. Prasannan
After months of excavation in Ayodhya, the Archaeological Survey of India
found that a Hindu temple had existed under the debris of the razed Babri
mosque. A gladdened Vishwa Hindu Parishad is gearing up for another
agitation for constructing a Ram temple there. It has called for a special
session of Parliament by mid-October for legislation to facilitate it, and
devotees from one lakh villages are expected to converge on Ayodhya on
October 17. What exactly did the ASI unearth? Was part of its report
written on the orders of powers that be? What was life like in Ayodhya? The
Week unrolls a tapestry of life from 6th century BC to 21st century.
"If Ram was a historical figure, and if his date is older than that of
Achaeminid emperors, he could have been the ruler of an Indus valley
kingdom where Harappan cities had existed earlier."
"NO structure of a capital city has been unearthed by the ASI. No palaces,
temples, trading marts, assembly halls or stables. If they are there, they
could be lying elsewhere."
"Though Pasenadi bore the name of an ancient king of the Ikshwaku line,
says D.D. Kosambi, "he was not properly a Ksatriya... He was of low tribal
origin."
How did the legend of Ram and the Ikshwakus come to be associated with
Kosala and Ayodhya? Prof. E.J. Rapson has this explanation: "In the
Puranas, which were the common scriptures of the ruling Aryan peoples of
northern and western India, the traditional genealogies of the royal houses
have been collected and made to form a consistent whole. Not only are the
ancient tribes of the Rigveda and the kingdoms immediately descended from
them represented here, but the realms of Kosala (Ayodhya), Videha, Vaisali,
and Magadha, which were not Aryanised until a later date, have also been
brought into the scheme and furnished with a still longer and more august
pedigree."
"Styling themselves after mythical or ancient dynasties was a fashion among
kings of the post-Gupta period which witnessed a Hindu revival at the
expense of Buddhism. There was a clan calling themselves Ikshvakus in the
Andhra country. Their kings followed Vedic practices while their wives
patronised Buddhist sangha. They built the magnificent Nagarjunakonda. The
counter to this argument is: If Skandagupta wanted to wallow in Suryavanshi
glory, he would also have built a temple for Ram in the town he called
Ayodhya. "
"Glazed tiles have been found at the site. "Glazed ware was not at all used
in temples," says Habib. "
The VHP came on the scene in 1984 calling for removal of the mosque. Rajiv
Gandhi allowed shilanyas for a temple (1989); L.K. Advani began a rath
yatra (September 1990); and the V.P. Singh government fell (November).
Narasimha Rao allowed a kar seva on December 6, 1992. Kar sevaks pulled
down the mosque, installed the idol of Ram in a make-shift temple, and
smashed cameras of photographers.
An item recovered, and registered as No 982 from Trench ZE2, Layer No:
ZE1/ZE2 Baulkh, is a 157134 Fuji non-TV zoom lens made in Japan.
Howlers on Ayodhya
Here is another addition to the list of absurd, boring & secular analysis of the ASI report on Ayodhya. Some amusing excerpts are reproduced here. Not a single photo from the report has been published, only "artist's
impressions" of ancient pottery! For fear of letting the cat out of the bag?
------------
Cover story
The unknown Ayodhya
Oct 19, 2003.
The Week
[url="http://www.the-week.com/"]http://www.the-week.com/[/url]
By R. Prasannan
After months of excavation in Ayodhya, the Archaeological Survey of India
found that a Hindu temple had existed under the debris of the razed Babri
mosque. A gladdened Vishwa Hindu Parishad is gearing up for another
agitation for constructing a Ram temple there. It has called for a special
session of Parliament by mid-October for legislation to facilitate it, and
devotees from one lakh villages are expected to converge on Ayodhya on
October 17. What exactly did the ASI unearth? Was part of its report
written on the orders of powers that be? What was life like in Ayodhya? The
Week unrolls a tapestry of life from 6th century BC to 21st century.
"If Ram was a historical figure, and if his date is older than that of
Achaeminid emperors, he could have been the ruler of an Indus valley
kingdom where Harappan cities had existed earlier."
"NO structure of a capital city has been unearthed by the ASI. No palaces,
temples, trading marts, assembly halls or stables. If they are there, they
could be lying elsewhere."
"Though Pasenadi bore the name of an ancient king of the Ikshwaku line,
says D.D. Kosambi, "he was not properly a Ksatriya... He was of low tribal
origin."
How did the legend of Ram and the Ikshwakus come to be associated with
Kosala and Ayodhya? Prof. E.J. Rapson has this explanation: "In the
Puranas, which were the common scriptures of the ruling Aryan peoples of
northern and western India, the traditional genealogies of the royal houses
have been collected and made to form a consistent whole. Not only are the
ancient tribes of the Rigveda and the kingdoms immediately descended from
them represented here, but the realms of Kosala (Ayodhya), Videha, Vaisali,
and Magadha, which were not Aryanised until a later date, have also been
brought into the scheme and furnished with a still longer and more august
pedigree."
"Styling themselves after mythical or ancient dynasties was a fashion among
kings of the post-Gupta period which witnessed a Hindu revival at the
expense of Buddhism. There was a clan calling themselves Ikshvakus in the
Andhra country. Their kings followed Vedic practices while their wives
patronised Buddhist sangha. They built the magnificent Nagarjunakonda. The
counter to this argument is: If Skandagupta wanted to wallow in Suryavanshi
glory, he would also have built a temple for Ram in the town he called
Ayodhya. "
"Glazed tiles have been found at the site. "Glazed ware was not at all used
in temples," says Habib. "
The VHP came on the scene in 1984 calling for removal of the mosque. Rajiv
Gandhi allowed shilanyas for a temple (1989); L.K. Advani began a rath
yatra (September 1990); and the V.P. Singh government fell (November).
Narasimha Rao allowed a kar seva on December 6, 1992. Kar sevaks pulled
down the mosque, installed the idol of Ram in a make-shift temple, and
smashed cameras of photographers.
An item recovered, and registered as No 982 from Trench ZE2, Layer No:
ZE1/ZE2 Baulkh, is a 157134 Fuji non-TV zoom lens made in Japan.