11-25-2004, 10:02 PM
Satya
May be , there is something that you have been not aware of.The decision of the judges are not their personal opinions nor are they a result of their thoughts/bias.
It is a system.While i do agree that the level of corruption in the system is high , it should be understood that established law procedures , precedents set by a number of other higher authorities are ithe ones which the judges are supposed to use as guidelines in arriving at their decisions.It is not the individual arriving at the system, he is merely a tool.You cannot blame the tool.
There are a number of chances for the acharya to prove his innocence.He cannot be called the murderer , unless he choses to exhaust all his appeal options in the country.<b>That being said the matt have also stated that they would like to prove his innocence in court, thereby setting an example for other religions to follow</b>.Which am afraid is totally not in line with your words.So , no , i differ.<b>The society nor this case , does not solely lie upon the mercy of one individual.</b> .
<i>State of affairs reg the judicial system ,as you have pointed out are not really something that makes one proud of it</i>. BUT , what rights we have been granted are , i am convinced , are enough to give you the maximum oppurtunity to prove your innocence.
May be , there is something that you have been not aware of.The decision of the judges are not their personal opinions nor are they a result of their thoughts/bias.
It is a system.While i do agree that the level of corruption in the system is high , it should be understood that established law procedures , precedents set by a number of other higher authorities are ithe ones which the judges are supposed to use as guidelines in arriving at their decisions.It is not the individual arriving at the system, he is merely a tool.You cannot blame the tool.
There are a number of chances for the acharya to prove his innocence.He cannot be called the murderer , unless he choses to exhaust all his appeal options in the country.<b>That being said the matt have also stated that they would like to prove his innocence in court, thereby setting an example for other religions to follow</b>.Which am afraid is totally not in line with your words.So , no , i differ.<b>The society nor this case , does not solely lie upon the mercy of one individual.</b> .
<i>State of affairs reg the judicial system ,as you have pointed out are not really something that makes one proud of it</i>. BUT , what rights we have been granted are , i am convinced , are enough to give you the maximum oppurtunity to prove your innocence.