<!--QuoteBegin-k.ram+Dec 22 2008, 08:38 AM-->QUOTE(k.ram @ Dec 22 2008, 08:38 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodna...e=abhinav&sid=1
<b>An Open Letter To Arundhati Roy</b>
Abhinav Kumar,Dec. 19
<i>To call the foreign funded insurgency in Kashmir and the terror attacks across the country as justified blowback for the failures of the Indian state and civil society is both false and callous. It implies a failure of the imagination and the intellect and the complete abdication of moral responsibility by you.</i>
Dear Ms Roy,
For many years now you have enriched the public life of our nation.
<snipped out further undeserved drool>
[right][snapback]92092[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Enriched? <i>Enriched?</i> Does that word now also have a different meaning from what I have thus far understood? <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
And then this statement addressed to Suzanna Margaret Roy:
"It implies a failure of the imagination and the intellect and the complete abdication of moral responsibility by you."
This sentence means to make out that she once had an imagination and an intellect (in order for these to have failed now) and that she was ever possessed of any moral responsibility for Suzanna to have abdicated it now. Mwahahahaha x 5.
Neither any imagination nor intellect that she's accused of having previously owned was what won her the "Booker Prize". In fact, her method to get it affords sufficient cause to psychoanalyse her and her current curious crusade on western imperialism ('curious', since in this she does not behave like the good little christian stooge she was programmed to be, whereas her counterpart Dinesh De Souza has perfectly learned to bow and kneel without command): obviously she blames the west for her "exploitation", though I'm sure she could not have been unwilling and had certainly been compensated for it with her Hooker Prize besides. It is ungenerous of her to complain about it now and devious (but christian) of her to try and get back at them by vindictively using her insincere "social activist causes".
In fact, I am not surprised any more that the Hooker Prize has turned out to be an unprestigious award after all. Teresa getting a Nobel Peace Pwize in spite of doing nothing for peace was a mystery for sometime, as was doubtless the Nobel award for something (economics perhaps?) given to that other anti-Hindu christian plant Amartya Sen. But an entry at Rajeev2004 blogspot finally explained it all to me:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/12/how...-his-nobel.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>How Amartya got his Nobel</b>
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/N...how/3858336.cms
  Several Nobel science prize committees in Sweden are being investigated for possible bribery, a special corruption prosecutor said
Posted by AGworld at 12/19/2008 01:44:00 AM 1 comments <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->While Nobel science pwizes and Nobel piece and litter-ature pwizes are slightly different, I am sure heathens need not resort to doing too much of complex computations to work out what happened and to appreciate that the sort of cheating to award the science pwize may have been applicable to other types of nobel pwizes (Teresa's Peace) as well.
<b>An Open Letter To Arundhati Roy</b>
Abhinav Kumar,Dec. 19
<i>To call the foreign funded insurgency in Kashmir and the terror attacks across the country as justified blowback for the failures of the Indian state and civil society is both false and callous. It implies a failure of the imagination and the intellect and the complete abdication of moral responsibility by you.</i>
Dear Ms Roy,
For many years now you have enriched the public life of our nation.
<snipped out further undeserved drool>
[right][snapback]92092[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Enriched? <i>Enriched?</i> Does that word now also have a different meaning from what I have thus far understood? <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo-->
And then this statement addressed to Suzanna Margaret Roy:
"It implies a failure of the imagination and the intellect and the complete abdication of moral responsibility by you."
This sentence means to make out that she once had an imagination and an intellect (in order for these to have failed now) and that she was ever possessed of any moral responsibility for Suzanna to have abdicated it now. Mwahahahaha x 5.
Neither any imagination nor intellect that she's accused of having previously owned was what won her the "Booker Prize". In fact, her method to get it affords sufficient cause to psychoanalyse her and her current curious crusade on western imperialism ('curious', since in this she does not behave like the good little christian stooge she was programmed to be, whereas her counterpart Dinesh De Souza has perfectly learned to bow and kneel without command): obviously she blames the west for her "exploitation", though I'm sure she could not have been unwilling and had certainly been compensated for it with her Hooker Prize besides. It is ungenerous of her to complain about it now and devious (but christian) of her to try and get back at them by vindictively using her insincere "social activist causes".
In fact, I am not surprised any more that the Hooker Prize has turned out to be an unprestigious award after all. Teresa getting a Nobel Peace Pwize in spite of doing nothing for peace was a mystery for sometime, as was doubtless the Nobel award for something (economics perhaps?) given to that other anti-Hindu christian plant Amartya Sen. But an entry at Rajeev2004 blogspot finally explained it all to me:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/12/how...-his-nobel.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>How Amartya got his Nobel</b>
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/N...how/3858336.cms
  Several Nobel science prize committees in Sweden are being investigated for possible bribery, a special corruption prosecutor said
Posted by AGworld at 12/19/2008 01:44:00 AM 1 comments <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->While Nobel science pwizes and Nobel piece and litter-ature pwizes are slightly different, I am sure heathens need not resort to doing too much of complex computations to work out what happened and to appreciate that the sort of cheating to award the science pwize may have been applicable to other types of nobel pwizes (Teresa's Peace) as well.
Death to traitors.