01-18-2009, 05:38 PM
I do not disagree.
My first and foremost priority as I have always said is that the Hindus retake the right to rule, not necessarily on the basis of this constitution. Our rule will peremptorily and completely void this constitution. The question of co-opting the Muslims and the Christians is what we discussed. It is an option we offer to them, as we take over, as a first step to peacefully get back to their ancestoral parent religion as it had happened in the past. It is envisaged that there will be a time lag during which different religions could co-exist without being terribly antagonistic because the Hindus are in power. That is all. What we do if they reject is a different matter. And we do have the historical lessons of letting them practice to our detriment. (In Tamil there is a saying that if you give milk to the snake, it will yet bite you. That is its nature!)
We should not forget the forces at play. Broadly there are three that are religion based. The Muslims and the Christians are international in character while the Hindus are local to India. The forth is the irreligious Philosophy of Secularism of the International Capitalism. This secularism is actually rooted in Christianity. Socialism and Communism also belong to the Christian root. Their philosophy of state intervention is adopted by the capitalists in times of economic crisis which cyclically affect capitalism.
The struggle between the Muslims and Christians from the 8th to the 15th century in the wars known as Crusades was interrupted by the success of Christendom in their colonization of the Asia, Africa and the Americas and later giving rise to the phenomena of Nazis and the Communists competing for colonialism and neo-colonialism. The ensuing fight from the beginning of the second world war to the early 1990s resulted in the weakness of the Christendom and the strengthening the Islamic Jihadism. This has unleashed the revival of the struggle between the Christians and the Muslims that was disrupted in the 15th century on the one hand and the energetic expansion of Islam by means of sword and petro-dollar on the other.
The nuclear arming of Pakistan and the attack on the twin towers on 9/11 together form the focal point of this contradiction. The Saudis who finance the worldwide spread of Islam and the Pakis who play sappers and miners together with the entire Islamic world which condone and cherish the attacks on the U.S, Israel and India are arrayed on the one side while the victims of their attacks are divided. My guess is that George Bush saw the 9/11 attack as the Islamic conspiracy and not an abberation of a militant Islamic outfit Al Quieda and decided to answer them by seizing one of their jewels viz. Iraq. Unfortunately the victims of Islamic Jihad viz. the Europe and India did not respond favorably and he had to go it alone. There were tactical mistakes that were costly and the war lingered and the tired Americans in their shortsightedness have elected a half-Muslim democrat as their president. However Hilary Clinton the new secretary of state is a strong pro-Israelite and hopefully she would moderate any attempt at radical departure by the new administration.
The short-sightedness of the philosophy of secularism practiced by most of the capitalist countries (India included) has been taken advantage of by the Islamists to expand in these countries. Europe is being reclaimed by the Muslims. It is said that there are more mosques than churches in France. ( Muslim boom in France: more mosques, fewer churches ). The rate of increase of Muslims in India is at an alarming pace ( Pakistan-Bangladesh plan a Mughalistan to split India ).
The Christians while being in the process of losing out to the Muslims in Europe are spreading their tentacles of expansion by proselytisation in South Asia particularly India. Their attacks on Hindus and Hindu outfits make it difficult for us to align with them to form alliance against Islam.
The secularist gendermerie's singular aim is to attack Hindus in India and their constitution of political-judicial tool is their weapon of Hindu destruction.
The Hindus need not feel completely isolated. The Jews of Israel are facing the same common enemy of the Hindus. They have a far greater determination than the Hindus have. In addition they have a state power that the Hindus do not have. We Hindus have to find ways to align with them and seek their help.
My first and foremost priority as I have always said is that the Hindus retake the right to rule, not necessarily on the basis of this constitution. Our rule will peremptorily and completely void this constitution. The question of co-opting the Muslims and the Christians is what we discussed. It is an option we offer to them, as we take over, as a first step to peacefully get back to their ancestoral parent religion as it had happened in the past. It is envisaged that there will be a time lag during which different religions could co-exist without being terribly antagonistic because the Hindus are in power. That is all. What we do if they reject is a different matter. And we do have the historical lessons of letting them practice to our detriment. (In Tamil there is a saying that if you give milk to the snake, it will yet bite you. That is its nature!)
We should not forget the forces at play. Broadly there are three that are religion based. The Muslims and the Christians are international in character while the Hindus are local to India. The forth is the irreligious Philosophy of Secularism of the International Capitalism. This secularism is actually rooted in Christianity. Socialism and Communism also belong to the Christian root. Their philosophy of state intervention is adopted by the capitalists in times of economic crisis which cyclically affect capitalism.
The struggle between the Muslims and Christians from the 8th to the 15th century in the wars known as Crusades was interrupted by the success of Christendom in their colonization of the Asia, Africa and the Americas and later giving rise to the phenomena of Nazis and the Communists competing for colonialism and neo-colonialism. The ensuing fight from the beginning of the second world war to the early 1990s resulted in the weakness of the Christendom and the strengthening the Islamic Jihadism. This has unleashed the revival of the struggle between the Christians and the Muslims that was disrupted in the 15th century on the one hand and the energetic expansion of Islam by means of sword and petro-dollar on the other.
The nuclear arming of Pakistan and the attack on the twin towers on 9/11 together form the focal point of this contradiction. The Saudis who finance the worldwide spread of Islam and the Pakis who play sappers and miners together with the entire Islamic world which condone and cherish the attacks on the U.S, Israel and India are arrayed on the one side while the victims of their attacks are divided. My guess is that George Bush saw the 9/11 attack as the Islamic conspiracy and not an abberation of a militant Islamic outfit Al Quieda and decided to answer them by seizing one of their jewels viz. Iraq. Unfortunately the victims of Islamic Jihad viz. the Europe and India did not respond favorably and he had to go it alone. There were tactical mistakes that were costly and the war lingered and the tired Americans in their shortsightedness have elected a half-Muslim democrat as their president. However Hilary Clinton the new secretary of state is a strong pro-Israelite and hopefully she would moderate any attempt at radical departure by the new administration.
The short-sightedness of the philosophy of secularism practiced by most of the capitalist countries (India included) has been taken advantage of by the Islamists to expand in these countries. Europe is being reclaimed by the Muslims. It is said that there are more mosques than churches in France. ( Muslim boom in France: more mosques, fewer churches ). The rate of increase of Muslims in India is at an alarming pace ( Pakistan-Bangladesh plan a Mughalistan to split India ).
The Christians while being in the process of losing out to the Muslims in Europe are spreading their tentacles of expansion by proselytisation in South Asia particularly India. Their attacks on Hindus and Hindu outfits make it difficult for us to align with them to form alliance against Islam.
The secularist gendermerie's singular aim is to attack Hindus in India and their constitution of political-judicial tool is their weapon of Hindu destruction.
The Hindus need not feel completely isolated. The Jews of Israel are facing the same common enemy of the Hindus. They have a far greater determination than the Hindus have. In addition they have a state power that the Hindus do not have. We Hindus have to find ways to align with them and seek their help.