01-29-2009, 07:26 PM
That article by Amulya Ganguli is on expected lines. I have never seen him say one good thing about the BJP. What do you expect from him? A BJP hater par excellence keeps doling out crap every once in a while.
BJP kept 2/3 states it had. The third one ot lost because of infighting. Sure it lost Delhi.
On the whole BJP has done well. So what is he talking about.
If Kalyan Singh is such a great leader, then how come BJP did so badly in UP in 2007 elections. Even his son could not win from Lodh dominated constituency.
Uma Bharti could not even win her MLA seat.
BJP sure has problems especially with Shekhwat in Raj and also Kalyan's loss was asetback. But to say that BJP has issues holding together is nothing but Amulya ganguli's wet dream.
How can joining the Ram Janambhoomi movement be a mistake for the BJP. He must be a fool for saying that. They are ruling 10 states, dominated politics for 20 years, ruled at center for 6 years: all because of support to Ram Janambhoomi movement. Only a commie fool will trace any problem to "communal" issues.
Even if BJP back to 2 seats, support for Ram Janmbhoomi was worth it for the party. Any party would be willing to support a cause that will take the party from 2 seats to being the single largest party for 3 elections and power at the center in 10 years.
Amulya Ganguli can take his article and shove it where sun don;t shine.
BJP kept 2/3 states it had. The third one ot lost because of infighting. Sure it lost Delhi.
On the whole BJP has done well. So what is he talking about.
If Kalyan Singh is such a great leader, then how come BJP did so badly in UP in 2007 elections. Even his son could not win from Lodh dominated constituency.
Uma Bharti could not even win her MLA seat.
BJP sure has problems especially with Shekhwat in Raj and also Kalyan's loss was asetback. But to say that BJP has issues holding together is nothing but Amulya ganguli's wet dream.
How can joining the Ram Janambhoomi movement be a mistake for the BJP. He must be a fool for saying that. They are ruling 10 states, dominated politics for 20 years, ruled at center for 6 years: all because of support to Ram Janambhoomi movement. Only a commie fool will trace any problem to "communal" issues.
Even if BJP back to 2 seats, support for Ram Janmbhoomi was worth it for the party. Any party would be willing to support a cause that will take the party from 2 seats to being the single largest party for 3 elections and power at the center in 10 years.
Amulya Ganguli can take his article and shove it where sun don;t shine.