^ Bodhi's encouraging posts
<!--QuoteBegin-Shambhu+Feb 4 2009, 07:54 PM-->QUOTE(Shambhu @ Feb 4 2009, 07:54 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Pushing articles that are 95% correct is far better than waiting for a 100% correct article,[right][snapback]94253[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->But it got the most fundamental thing (something not to be measured in percentages) all skewed. After which I really don't see the point of it.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->No one was proved to be a Hindu "terrorist". That can be added as a footnote.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You and I have very different, irreconcilable views: what is of paramount importance to me is perceived by you to be of only 5% value - no more than a footnote, in fact.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->However, <i>apart from that,</i> the article adds so much to the average Hindu's knowledge in India.
[...]
If you want to propagate a movement, skip the urge to be perfect!
[...]
Time to sit back and examine things will come mach later, right now just increase your audience! <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Perfect? Expecting people to keep to no more than known facts is to ask for perfection? I don't want to know your definition of mediocrity then.
Propagating a movement? And what 'audience'? You speak as if all this is no more than a game to you. Innocent people have been tortured for no reason other than sadism and their reputations trampled upon with premeditation, yet their innocence itself appears but a bartering tool for you: if selling their case out in the short term will help you sell more of the ideas you approve of, then it's okay?
I don't know what value your ideas could possibly have when you are unable to see the value of what you're willing to sacrifice in order to 'propagate' them.
<!--QuoteBegin-Shambhu+Feb 4 2009, 07:54 PM-->QUOTE(Shambhu @ Feb 4 2009, 07:54 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Pushing articles that are 95% correct is far better than waiting for a 100% correct article,[right][snapback]94253[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->But it got the most fundamental thing (something not to be measured in percentages) all skewed. After which I really don't see the point of it.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->No one was proved to be a Hindu "terrorist". That can be added as a footnote.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->You and I have very different, irreconcilable views: what is of paramount importance to me is perceived by you to be of only 5% value - no more than a footnote, in fact.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->However, <i>apart from that,</i> the article adds so much to the average Hindu's knowledge in India.
[...]
If you want to propagate a movement, skip the urge to be perfect!
[...]
Time to sit back and examine things will come mach later, right now just increase your audience! <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Perfect? Expecting people to keep to no more than known facts is to ask for perfection? I don't want to know your definition of mediocrity then.
Propagating a movement? And what 'audience'? You speak as if all this is no more than a game to you. Innocent people have been tortured for no reason other than sadism and their reputations trampled upon with premeditation, yet their innocence itself appears but a bartering tool for you: if selling their case out in the short term will help you sell more of the ideas you approve of, then it's okay?
I don't know what value your ideas could possibly have when you are unable to see the value of what you're willing to sacrifice in order to 'propagate' them.
Death to traitors.