<!--QuoteBegin-brihaspati+Feb 17 2009, 07:05 AM-->QUOTE(brihaspati @ Feb 17 2009, 07:05 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Why are we discussing Mahabharatam for role of Christianity and Islam in slavery? Is it because we want to contrast with the nature and practice of slavery in Christianity and Islam. An important difference at least with Islam is that since Islam is claimed primarily to be a revelation from "Allah", the Quranic injunctions about slavery become "Allah-given"[right][snapback]94646[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's *exactly* the same in christianism, there's no difference: slavery is gawd-ordained and their non-existent gawd has entire peoples "predestined" for slavery. It's in the babble and the babble is gawd's word and every christian Loves the Word (Philo + Logos).
DMK's name is the secular variant for their actual name of HMK: H for Hamitic (since that is what all this belief in Dravidoidism actually means, it's just a different word for Hamitic). Every Indian christo is automatically a Hamite because he believes in the babble. Because it is the babble - the word of gawd - that tells them that non-Europeans and non-ME people are Hamites, who are all intended for slavery under the Japhetites (Oryans) and Semites.
If Indian christos feel so strongly about being predestined for slavery - after all, jeebusjehovallah wills it so, so how dare one contradict it with ideas that are merely human/Deistic like Paine's 'Rights of Man' - I find I must be unqualified to try and argue them out of it.
Therefore, since they feel it incumbent upon them, Indian christos can go ahead and "Give unto Caesar" in life (in the deeply faithful manner that the christoised Philipinos are programmed by christianism to keep surrendering themselves to exploitation, abuse and murder by the christowest) so that after death (hocus pocus) they will magically gain the promised Carrot.
(Terms and conditions apply on the Carrot Promise, such as
1. Christianism and christos and the church pre-reserve their immunity from lawsuits should the Carrot prove no more than fabulous fable, because
2. "All undertakings in blind faith carry risk." But oh ye of faith, please Believe Because It Absurdum Est. There is no other reason to.)
DMK's name is the secular variant for their actual name of HMK: H for Hamitic (since that is what all this belief in Dravidoidism actually means, it's just a different word for Hamitic). Every Indian christo is automatically a Hamite because he believes in the babble. Because it is the babble - the word of gawd - that tells them that non-Europeans and non-ME people are Hamites, who are all intended for slavery under the Japhetites (Oryans) and Semites.
If Indian christos feel so strongly about being predestined for slavery - after all, jeebusjehovallah wills it so, so how dare one contradict it with ideas that are merely human/Deistic like Paine's 'Rights of Man' - I find I must be unqualified to try and argue them out of it.
Therefore, since they feel it incumbent upon them, Indian christos can go ahead and "Give unto Caesar" in life (in the deeply faithful manner that the christoised Philipinos are programmed by christianism to keep surrendering themselves to exploitation, abuse and murder by the christowest) so that after death (hocus pocus) they will magically gain the promised Carrot.
(Terms and conditions apply on the Carrot Promise, such as
1. Christianism and christos and the church pre-reserve their immunity from lawsuits should the Carrot prove no more than fabulous fable, because
2. "All undertakings in blind faith carry risk." But oh ye of faith, please Believe Because It Absurdum Est. There is no other reason to.)