<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->.... The British were the darkeners of the light, the precursors of the modern Indian infidel state. British historians in the past have tended to see Muslim rule as a preface to their own, and their own as a restoration of ordered life in a decayed society and the introduction of fresh light from the West, and more particularly the Western isles.[2]
This concept of progress seems to be at work behind the statement that ââ¬ÅBritish historians in the past tended to see Muslim rule as a preface to their own, and their own as a restoration of ordered life in a delayed societyââ¬Â. Ironically, the author himself ends up by viewing British rule itself in relation to India through the same prism![3]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
the double colonialism dynamic.
This concept of progress seems to be at work behind the statement that ââ¬ÅBritish historians in the past tended to see Muslim rule as a preface to their own, and their own as a restoration of ordered life in a delayed societyââ¬Â. Ironically, the author himself ends up by viewing British rule itself in relation to India through the same prism![3]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
the double colonialism dynamic.