Several items on the islamaniac attack in TSP on the obviously kaffiri Sri Lankan cricket players.
1. One Sri Lankan cricketer has realised it's an inside job and that the islamaniac TSP govt's security was the actual one to blame:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Pakistan/
Muralitharan_blasts_Pak_security_arrangement_suspects_insiders/articleshow/4228766.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muralitharan blasts Pak security arrangement, suspects insiders</b>
5 Mar 2009, 1611 hrs IST, PTI
MELBOURNE: Sri Lanka spinner Muttiah Muralitharan on Friday hit-out at the security arrangements in Pakistan in the wake of the deadly terror attackÂ
on his team bus in Lahore and suspected militants had inside information about their movement.
"Somehow in this incident there were no police with guns on the bus," the 36-year-old off-spinner said.
"If someone was there with a gun we would have had a chance of defending ourselves," said the world's highest wicket-taker in both Tests and one-dayers.
"Normally all the buses go and we have four or five escorts," said the spin legend revealing his anguish that there could have been inside information about the Sri Lankan team bus' route to the Gaddafi stadium.
"We left at 8.30am, and Younis Khan (with the Pakistan team) at 8.35am. We divided into two, maybe they knew the information for the right time. They tried to shoot the driver. Then they were shooting both sides of the bus and they counted 39 holes," he told 'Radio 5AA' in an interview.
The off-spinner said he thought Tharanga Paranavitana, who along with Thilan Samaraweera was one of the more seriously wounded players, would die from injuries.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
2. http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/03/att...et-team-is.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wednesday, March 04, 2009
<b>the attack on the sri lankan cricket team is 'diplomatic theater' by the ISI</b>
mar 4th, 2009
as were the various 'assassination attempts' on musharraf, all of which happened just after musharraf's convoy had passed the sites where the bombs were detonated. miraculous, indeed. lo, the ISI is merciful! a few policemen died, but who cares? there are plenty of poor pakistanis to serve as cannon fodder.
consider the following:
1. now the pakistanis can claim, "we are also the victims of terrorism just as much as india is". james astill will be the first person claiming india-pakistan-equal-equal. (sorry, he has been pre-empted by the guy writing in the nyt, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/04/opinio....html?_r=1 who gave away the game -- see where his interviewee says: "They were saying that this was done to show the Indians that we in Pakistan are also the victims of terrorism." You think our own government did it?" I asked.
"No one else could get away with this kind of thing," he insisted.
He described the attackers' feat: they appeared out of nowhere at one of the city's busiest intersections and fired for more than 20 minutes at the van carrying the players to Qaddafi Stadium, and then fled in rickshaws.
"I know the kind of precautions we have to take when we are in a V.I.P. motorcade," the young officer told me. "And this was a 'V.V.I.P.' motorcade. Every house in that neighborhood was surrounded by the police. My friend was there and he told me the attackers didn't receive a single wound.") sorry, no cigar, james astill.
2. the UPA will now proclaim the same india-pakistan-equal-equal. pronob mukherjee will say he is bherry bherry saarry and suggest that the piss process be started again.
3. the mumbai attack is now forgotten. see 1 and 2. also, the kkkangress will remind us that "one pakistani did mumble something that mumbai attackers came from their country". this is a momentous achievement, of historic dimensions. therefore the kkkangress has done its bit to ensure the safety and security of all individuals in india. therefore there will be no further action on the mumbai invasion. chidambaram will mouth "if there is yet another attack on india, we will... we will... hold our breath until we are blue in the face. so there!"
4. isn't it amazing that even though the attackers had rocket-propelled grenades and other medium-heavy weapons, they only managed to shoot off some kalashnikovs?
5. as per 4, there were only minor injuries to the sri lankans. but this is being portrayed as "see, in india foreigners were targeted. in pakistan too foreigners were targeted." let us forget that in india the jews and others were raped, tortured, mutilated and then killed based on explicit cell phone instructions emanating from pakistan
6. the attackers jogged up from a grassy knoll (yes, remember the grassy knoll in the kennedy assassination?), fired for 20 minutes, and then leisurely ran away to their auto-rickshaws, which then took them to safety. this while there were lots of policemen around. and this is the center of punjabi power.
7. why didn't the attackers do the 'suicide-bombing' thing, which would have -- if they really meant it -- guaranteed that the entire busload of sri lankans would have been wiped out?
8. why didn't they attack the hotel where the sri lankans had been camped out? that would have been quite easy.
9. why wasn't there more security for the sri lankans?
therefore the conclusion is that this is an ISI 'production' -- scripted and choreographed by them. very nicely done, too. perhaps hamid gul can be nominated for the mohammedan film awards, oops... oscars, for best supporting actor? and manmohan singh for best patsy?
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 3/04/2009 06:39:00 PM
<b>1 comments:</b>
<b>witan said...
</b>
  Today's Statesman carries a report in which it says: "Pakistan coach Mr Intikhab Alam said that usually both teams would leave the hotel together for the stadium around 8.40 a.m., <b>but the hosts were saved today by skipper Younis' decision to go separately.</b> "The Sri Lankans decided to leave five minutes early today and our captain had decided we would go separately,â Mr Alam said."
  Does it not suggest that the Pak team was *advised* to leave 5 min after the Lanka team? What does it mean?
  3/04/2009 11:19 PM
Post a Comment<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Yes, Witan twigged on the truth on the 4th of March itself. Hope he learns of the news article in 1.
3. And now the following hysteria. Brought to you by the TOI (the christianist mouthpiece that worked hard to insinuate the existence of "Hindu Terrier" in acts that factually turned out to be Islamic terrorist crimes). The TOI thinks it worthwhile to ask terrorists whether they did it - because TOI believes islamic terrorists are oh-so-honourable that it considers any denials they make worthy of reporting. And <i>of course</i> the anti-Indian Pakistani LeT in Kashmir would blame India if given half a chance. Naturally, TOI has reasons for asking them and letting them speak. The reasons become apparent when you look at TOI's use of the term 'militants' instead of 'terrorists' to describe the LeT. And how it describes the LeT as merely "fighting" with the Indian government, thus legitimising islamic <b>terrorism</b> in Kashmir by what even TOI has to admit is a <i>Pakistani</i> outfit. With the word 'fighting', TOI has put islamic terrorists on equal footing with Indian governance.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
Lashkar-denies-role-in-attack-on-Lanka-team-in-Pak/articleshow/4235847.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Lashkar denies role in attack on Lanka team in Pak</b>
6 Mar 2009, 1958 hrs IST, AFP
SRINAGAR: <b>Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba</b> rejected media reports in Pakistan that it was involved in an attack on Sri Lanka's cricketÂ
squad.
"These media reports are false, incorrect and baseless," Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) spokesman Abdullah Ghaznavi said. He was speaking by telephone from Srinagar from an undisclosed location.
Pakistani newspapers suggested Friday that preliminary investigations pointed to the involvement of home-grown militants, including LeT, which has been blamed for the attacks in Mumbai late last year that killed 165 people.
LeT has also denied any role in the Mumbai attacks.
(Oh poor misunderstood things: to always be suspected of further islamaniacal terrorism. <i>Of course</i> the world takes terrorists' denials into consideration <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='rolleyes.gif' /><!--endemo--> )
"The attack on Sri Lanka's team was an attack on Pakistan's sovereignty and Kashmiri militants could never even think of that (such an attack)," Ghaznavi said.
(Already known, but the reference to respecting Pak sovereignty is an admission by LeT - known to be a <i>Pakistani</i> terrorist group - that they work for TSP <i>govt</i> itself. This is in contrast to the many other Pak islamic terrorists who are <i>known</i> to blow up Pakistani army/police/authorities and be militating against TSP governance. Examples seen frequently throughout this thread. Even today's news, 7th of March 2009: Suicide car blast in Pakistan; 7 policemen killed, already in Mudy's post above.)
<b>LeT, which has been fighting New Delhi's rule in Indian-administered Kashmir, blamed Indian security agencies for the Lahore attack.
"The attack is the handiwork of Indian agencies to defame Pakistan and bring instability to the country," Ghaznavi said. </b>
( <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->Â <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo--> Ghazi better check out how the Paki govt has had to admit it is <i>not</i> India - see bottom of post. TSP gov is considering letting LeT roll for it, and are even trying to point to AQ, to get the scrutinizers off of themselves.)
<b>Pakistan's interior ministry chief said Friday he could not rule out foreign involvement in the Sri Lankan cricket attack, as speculation increased in Pakistan's domestic press that home-grown militants were to blame.</b>
(Yes, even their own press doesn't trust them anymore.)
"I cannot rule out (the involvement of a) foreign hand in the incident," Rehman Malik told reporters in Lahore.
Six Pakistani police and two civilians were killed Tuesday when gunmen ambushed the team en route to a Test match in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore. Seven Sri Lankan cricketers and a coach were among 19 people wounded.
Up to 12 men attacked the convoy of officials, coaches and players, firing automatic weapons, grenades and a rocket launcher as the vehicles approached Gaddafi stadium. The attackers fled without a trace but pictures of them were caught on videotape.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Note traitor-TOI's language use in the above</b>
- By describing India's governance of an integral part of itself (Kashmir) with the manipulated line "New Delhi's rule in Indian-administered Kashmir" - and thus separating the reality into 'New Delhi' to represent India, 'Kashmir' to represent itself and of course 'Indian-administered' to indicate further alienness, meddling and thus illegitimate rule - one can instantly see on whose side the christopaper TOI is on. Why aren't complaints flooding into TOI? Can people really be overlooking such blatant language usage?
- Taking the above points into account as well, the article <i>itself</i> is proof of the anti-Indian islamic treachery of the christoterrorist paper TOI: they are giving a terrorist outfit - the LeT - an opportunity to speak. Presumably because the kaffiri Indian victims of the LeT are given the same fair opportunity to speak. Oh wait. No, they're not. They just get blown away. Hmmm. That's probably why TOI doesn't interview <i>them</i>: because they're dead before the TOI gets there. Otherwise one can be sure that TOI will be quite fair-minded and interview the victims. However, TOI interviewing victims' <i>relatives</i> after each blast is out of the question: it doesn't have enough time or space for the coverage, you see. Too busy interviewing the terrorists like LeT - to get their all-important views and feelings and suspicions out.
Moreover, by allowing this absurd interview with the LeT presenting its accusation against Indian Intell, TOI is according weight to LeT's insinuations: creating the idea of equal respectability ('equally worth listening to/considering') in the minds of the Indian readership. I don't think any <i>Hindu</i> could still be reading TOI junk and thinking it's trustworthy.
4. There were news reports some two days ago perhaps (daily pioneer included I think) that Sri Lanka was not ruling out the possibility of LTTE having done the deed. But the christoterrorist LTTE - as 'reliable' a source as the islamiterrorist LeT, why not interview the AQ next? - are denying they had any hand.
5. I've not read the following beyond the titles, but further news links at the bottom of the above TOI article don't look to provide much emotional let alone any factual support to TOI/LeT's hopeless thesis that 'Maybe India did it':
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
Lashkar-denies-role-in-attack-on-Lanka-team-in-Pak/articleshow/4235847.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Pak bus hero's brother a jihadi killed in J&K</b> (Of course...)
Lashkar denies role in attack on Lanka team in Pak
<b>Lanka rubbishes India link in attack on cricket team
Where's the evidence of Indian hand in attack: Pak media
Lahore attack probe hints at LeT hand: Report
Musharraf condemns Lahore attack, says Pakistan 'ashamed'</b>
TV footage shows Lahore attackers fleeing past police
<b>Undeniable links between Pak govt and LeT: Former US intelligence officer</b>
(Yes, this has long been a public revelation rather than a private secret.)
<b>Pak suspects Qaida, rules out India hand </b>
'Living in a state of denial is Pakistan's speciality'
6 months after polls, Pak hurtling towards instability?
<b>Lahore top cop admits security lapse: Report</b>
<b>Muralitharan blasts Pak security arrangement, suspects insiders</b>
Bullet removed from Samaraweera's thigh
Interrogation of Lahore attack suspects on<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
1. One Sri Lankan cricketer has realised it's an inside job and that the islamaniac TSP govt's security was the actual one to blame:
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/Pakistan/
Muralitharan_blasts_Pak_security_arrangement_suspects_insiders/articleshow/4228766.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muralitharan blasts Pak security arrangement, suspects insiders</b>
5 Mar 2009, 1611 hrs IST, PTI
MELBOURNE: Sri Lanka spinner Muttiah Muralitharan on Friday hit-out at the security arrangements in Pakistan in the wake of the deadly terror attackÂ
on his team bus in Lahore and suspected militants had inside information about their movement.
"Somehow in this incident there were no police with guns on the bus," the 36-year-old off-spinner said.
"If someone was there with a gun we would have had a chance of defending ourselves," said the world's highest wicket-taker in both Tests and one-dayers.
"Normally all the buses go and we have four or five escorts," said the spin legend revealing his anguish that there could have been inside information about the Sri Lankan team bus' route to the Gaddafi stadium.
"We left at 8.30am, and Younis Khan (with the Pakistan team) at 8.35am. We divided into two, maybe they knew the information for the right time. They tried to shoot the driver. Then they were shooting both sides of the bus and they counted 39 holes," he told 'Radio 5AA' in an interview.
The off-spinner said he thought Tharanga Paranavitana, who along with Thilan Samaraweera was one of the more seriously wounded players, would die from injuries.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
2. http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/03/att...et-team-is.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wednesday, March 04, 2009
<b>the attack on the sri lankan cricket team is 'diplomatic theater' by the ISI</b>
mar 4th, 2009
as were the various 'assassination attempts' on musharraf, all of which happened just after musharraf's convoy had passed the sites where the bombs were detonated. miraculous, indeed. lo, the ISI is merciful! a few policemen died, but who cares? there are plenty of poor pakistanis to serve as cannon fodder.
consider the following:
1. now the pakistanis can claim, "we are also the victims of terrorism just as much as india is". james astill will be the first person claiming india-pakistan-equal-equal. (sorry, he has been pre-empted by the guy writing in the nyt, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/04/opinio....html?_r=1 who gave away the game -- see where his interviewee says: "They were saying that this was done to show the Indians that we in Pakistan are also the victims of terrorism." You think our own government did it?" I asked.
"No one else could get away with this kind of thing," he insisted.
He described the attackers' feat: they appeared out of nowhere at one of the city's busiest intersections and fired for more than 20 minutes at the van carrying the players to Qaddafi Stadium, and then fled in rickshaws.
"I know the kind of precautions we have to take when we are in a V.I.P. motorcade," the young officer told me. "And this was a 'V.V.I.P.' motorcade. Every house in that neighborhood was surrounded by the police. My friend was there and he told me the attackers didn't receive a single wound.") sorry, no cigar, james astill.
2. the UPA will now proclaim the same india-pakistan-equal-equal. pronob mukherjee will say he is bherry bherry saarry and suggest that the piss process be started again.
3. the mumbai attack is now forgotten. see 1 and 2. also, the kkkangress will remind us that "one pakistani did mumble something that mumbai attackers came from their country". this is a momentous achievement, of historic dimensions. therefore the kkkangress has done its bit to ensure the safety and security of all individuals in india. therefore there will be no further action on the mumbai invasion. chidambaram will mouth "if there is yet another attack on india, we will... we will... hold our breath until we are blue in the face. so there!"
4. isn't it amazing that even though the attackers had rocket-propelled grenades and other medium-heavy weapons, they only managed to shoot off some kalashnikovs?
5. as per 4, there were only minor injuries to the sri lankans. but this is being portrayed as "see, in india foreigners were targeted. in pakistan too foreigners were targeted." let us forget that in india the jews and others were raped, tortured, mutilated and then killed based on explicit cell phone instructions emanating from pakistan
6. the attackers jogged up from a grassy knoll (yes, remember the grassy knoll in the kennedy assassination?), fired for 20 minutes, and then leisurely ran away to their auto-rickshaws, which then took them to safety. this while there were lots of policemen around. and this is the center of punjabi power.
7. why didn't the attackers do the 'suicide-bombing' thing, which would have -- if they really meant it -- guaranteed that the entire busload of sri lankans would have been wiped out?
8. why didn't they attack the hotel where the sri lankans had been camped out? that would have been quite easy.
9. why wasn't there more security for the sri lankans?
therefore the conclusion is that this is an ISI 'production' -- scripted and choreographed by them. very nicely done, too. perhaps hamid gul can be nominated for the mohammedan film awards, oops... oscars, for best supporting actor? and manmohan singh for best patsy?
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 3/04/2009 06:39:00 PM
<b>1 comments:</b>
<b>witan said...
</b>
  Today's Statesman carries a report in which it says: "Pakistan coach Mr Intikhab Alam said that usually both teams would leave the hotel together for the stadium around 8.40 a.m., <b>but the hosts were saved today by skipper Younis' decision to go separately.</b> "The Sri Lankans decided to leave five minutes early today and our captain had decided we would go separately,â Mr Alam said."
  Does it not suggest that the Pak team was *advised* to leave 5 min after the Lanka team? What does it mean?
  3/04/2009 11:19 PM
Post a Comment<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Yes, Witan twigged on the truth on the 4th of March itself. Hope he learns of the news article in 1.
3. And now the following hysteria. Brought to you by the TOI (the christianist mouthpiece that worked hard to insinuate the existence of "Hindu Terrier" in acts that factually turned out to be Islamic terrorist crimes). The TOI thinks it worthwhile to ask terrorists whether they did it - because TOI believes islamic terrorists are oh-so-honourable that it considers any denials they make worthy of reporting. And <i>of course</i> the anti-Indian Pakistani LeT in Kashmir would blame India if given half a chance. Naturally, TOI has reasons for asking them and letting them speak. The reasons become apparent when you look at TOI's use of the term 'militants' instead of 'terrorists' to describe the LeT. And how it describes the LeT as merely "fighting" with the Indian government, thus legitimising islamic <b>terrorism</b> in Kashmir by what even TOI has to admit is a <i>Pakistani</i> outfit. With the word 'fighting', TOI has put islamic terrorists on equal footing with Indian governance.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
Lashkar-denies-role-in-attack-on-Lanka-team-in-Pak/articleshow/4235847.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Lashkar denies role in attack on Lanka team in Pak</b>
6 Mar 2009, 1958 hrs IST, AFP
SRINAGAR: <b>Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba</b> rejected media reports in Pakistan that it was involved in an attack on Sri Lanka's cricketÂ
squad.
"These media reports are false, incorrect and baseless," Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) spokesman Abdullah Ghaznavi said. He was speaking by telephone from Srinagar from an undisclosed location.
Pakistani newspapers suggested Friday that preliminary investigations pointed to the involvement of home-grown militants, including LeT, which has been blamed for the attacks in Mumbai late last year that killed 165 people.
LeT has also denied any role in the Mumbai attacks.
(Oh poor misunderstood things: to always be suspected of further islamaniacal terrorism. <i>Of course</i> the world takes terrorists' denials into consideration <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='rolleyes.gif' /><!--endemo--> )"The attack on Sri Lanka's team was an attack on Pakistan's sovereignty and Kashmiri militants could never even think of that (such an attack)," Ghaznavi said.
(Already known, but the reference to respecting Pak sovereignty is an admission by LeT - known to be a <i>Pakistani</i> terrorist group - that they work for TSP <i>govt</i> itself. This is in contrast to the many other Pak islamic terrorists who are <i>known</i> to blow up Pakistani army/police/authorities and be militating against TSP governance. Examples seen frequently throughout this thread. Even today's news, 7th of March 2009: Suicide car blast in Pakistan; 7 policemen killed, already in Mudy's post above.)
<b>LeT, which has been fighting New Delhi's rule in Indian-administered Kashmir, blamed Indian security agencies for the Lahore attack.
"The attack is the handiwork of Indian agencies to defame Pakistan and bring instability to the country," Ghaznavi said. </b>
( <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo-->Â <!--emo&:lol:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='laugh.gif' /><!--endemo--> Ghazi better check out how the Paki govt has had to admit it is <i>not</i> India - see bottom of post. TSP gov is considering letting LeT roll for it, and are even trying to point to AQ, to get the scrutinizers off of themselves.)
<b>Pakistan's interior ministry chief said Friday he could not rule out foreign involvement in the Sri Lankan cricket attack, as speculation increased in Pakistan's domestic press that home-grown militants were to blame.</b>
(Yes, even their own press doesn't trust them anymore.)
"I cannot rule out (the involvement of a) foreign hand in the incident," Rehman Malik told reporters in Lahore.
Six Pakistani police and two civilians were killed Tuesday when gunmen ambushed the team en route to a Test match in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore. Seven Sri Lankan cricketers and a coach were among 19 people wounded.
Up to 12 men attacked the convoy of officials, coaches and players, firing automatic weapons, grenades and a rocket launcher as the vehicles approached Gaddafi stadium. The attackers fled without a trace but pictures of them were caught on videotape.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Note traitor-TOI's language use in the above</b>
- By describing India's governance of an integral part of itself (Kashmir) with the manipulated line "New Delhi's rule in Indian-administered Kashmir" - and thus separating the reality into 'New Delhi' to represent India, 'Kashmir' to represent itself and of course 'Indian-administered' to indicate further alienness, meddling and thus illegitimate rule - one can instantly see on whose side the christopaper TOI is on. Why aren't complaints flooding into TOI? Can people really be overlooking such blatant language usage?
- Taking the above points into account as well, the article <i>itself</i> is proof of the anti-Indian islamic treachery of the christoterrorist paper TOI: they are giving a terrorist outfit - the LeT - an opportunity to speak. Presumably because the kaffiri Indian victims of the LeT are given the same fair opportunity to speak. Oh wait. No, they're not. They just get blown away. Hmmm. That's probably why TOI doesn't interview <i>them</i>: because they're dead before the TOI gets there. Otherwise one can be sure that TOI will be quite fair-minded and interview the victims. However, TOI interviewing victims' <i>relatives</i> after each blast is out of the question: it doesn't have enough time or space for the coverage, you see. Too busy interviewing the terrorists like LeT - to get their all-important views and feelings and suspicions out.
Moreover, by allowing this absurd interview with the LeT presenting its accusation against Indian Intell, TOI is according weight to LeT's insinuations: creating the idea of equal respectability ('equally worth listening to/considering') in the minds of the Indian readership. I don't think any <i>Hindu</i> could still be reading TOI junk and thinking it's trustworthy.
4. There were news reports some two days ago perhaps (daily pioneer included I think) that Sri Lanka was not ruling out the possibility of LTTE having done the deed. But the christoterrorist LTTE - as 'reliable' a source as the islamiterrorist LeT, why not interview the AQ next? - are denying they had any hand.
5. I've not read the following beyond the titles, but further news links at the bottom of the above TOI article don't look to provide much emotional let alone any factual support to TOI/LeT's hopeless thesis that 'Maybe India did it':
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
Lashkar-denies-role-in-attack-on-Lanka-team-in-Pak/articleshow/4235847.cms
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Pak bus hero's brother a jihadi killed in J&K</b> (Of course...)
Lashkar denies role in attack on Lanka team in Pak
<b>Lanka rubbishes India link in attack on cricket team
Where's the evidence of Indian hand in attack: Pak media
Lahore attack probe hints at LeT hand: Report
Musharraf condemns Lahore attack, says Pakistan 'ashamed'</b>
TV footage shows Lahore attackers fleeing past police
<b>Undeniable links between Pak govt and LeT: Former US intelligence officer</b>
(Yes, this has long been a public revelation rather than a private secret.)
<b>Pak suspects Qaida, rules out India hand </b>
'Living in a state of denial is Pakistan's speciality'
6 months after polls, Pak hurtling towards instability?
<b>Lahore top cop admits security lapse: Report</b>
<b>Muralitharan blasts Pak security arrangement, suspects insiders</b>
Bullet removed from Samaraweera's thigh
Interrogation of Lahore attack suspects on<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->