The thread is:
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...opic=2209&st=30
Will you crosspost it to there.
The thread is called "Nexus Between Entities Influencing India". It's pinned in the politics thread. I find I often overlook pinned items as well. I see I'm not the only one...
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wanted to post on thread which SwamyG and Husky were running about closet anti-Hindu agents, could not find.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's entirely Swamy G's thread.
I just posted a few items on that thread, same as you and others. The only threads I remember starting (not running, wouldn't know what that would entail) is the one on Natural Religions and the Media in Yugoslavia one.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Career communist pamphlet-writer and Gyan Peeth Award winner Mahasweta Devi does not want a cremation, but wants to be buried. Decries cremation as an unnatural act.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Circumstantial data, but I'm going to say it's a cryptochristo. In the same manner that the woman with a Hindu-sounding name who wanted Indian men to get circumcised 'for health reasons' sounded much like a cryptochristoislami. (The one BV posted on some time back. Can't remember.)
It's very important for christos to be buried. Catholics are particularly strict on this. Cryptoism is a tactic pioneered by catholicism (plus most of the cryptos in India practise catholicism rather than the other kinds). So I'm going to say this communist is a cryptocatholic based on the stats.
No forget it. How could it be anything other than secular reasons prompting her: after all, she could have just quietly chosen burial, no Hindu would have insisted she be cremated if that's not what she wanted. But it proves it's <i>secularism</i> that makes her go all <i>out of her way</i> to denounce the Hindu practice of cremation as 'unnatural' and then innocently opt for burial, which is only 'coincidently' enjoined by christianism. Reminiscent of how secular it was of the British to have put their foot down - based on their christian unprinciples - that Sati <i>must be</i> banned because it was (gasp!) <i>suicide</i> (to be banned because suicide 'coincidentally' goes against their christianism, I mean their secularism).
http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...opic=2209&st=30
Will you crosspost it to there.
The thread is called "Nexus Between Entities Influencing India". It's pinned in the politics thread. I find I often overlook pinned items as well. I see I'm not the only one...
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wanted to post on thread which SwamyG and Husky were running about closet anti-Hindu agents, could not find.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It's entirely Swamy G's thread.
I just posted a few items on that thread, same as you and others. The only threads I remember starting (not running, wouldn't know what that would entail) is the one on Natural Religions and the Media in Yugoslavia one.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Career communist pamphlet-writer and Gyan Peeth Award winner Mahasweta Devi does not want a cremation, but wants to be buried. Decries cremation as an unnatural act.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Circumstantial data, but I'm going to say it's a cryptochristo. In the same manner that the woman with a Hindu-sounding name who wanted Indian men to get circumcised 'for health reasons' sounded much like a cryptochristoislami. (The one BV posted on some time back. Can't remember.)
It's very important for christos to be buried. Catholics are particularly strict on this. Cryptoism is a tactic pioneered by catholicism (plus most of the cryptos in India practise catholicism rather than the other kinds). So I'm going to say this communist is a cryptocatholic based on the stats.
No forget it. How could it be anything other than secular reasons prompting her: after all, she could have just quietly chosen burial, no Hindu would have insisted she be cremated if that's not what she wanted. But it proves it's <i>secularism</i> that makes her go all <i>out of her way</i> to denounce the Hindu practice of cremation as 'unnatural' and then innocently opt for burial, which is only 'coincidently' enjoined by christianism. Reminiscent of how secular it was of the British to have put their foot down - based on their christian unprinciples - that Sati <i>must be</i> banned because it was (gasp!) <i>suicide</i> (to be banned because suicide 'coincidentally' goes against their christianism, I mean their secularism).