03-11-2009, 08:59 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Mar 8 2009, 12:42 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Mar 8 2009, 12:42 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->If I <i>wanted</i> true minimalism, I'd choose (Thomas Paine's) Deism. Looks to be a good religion.
Following the sort of patterns you've made, Deism would be the minimalism of Greco-Roman philosophy streams. <i>Plus</i>: in Deism, the Nature's God is consistent with NA native American Grand Spirit.
Not even American atheists and agnostics could be against Deism I think, as it is an individual's private religion and presents no dogma, nothing but good conduct is expected. What exists in another's mind - concerning the existence of the Deist Creator - cannot be offensive to atheists and agnostics, since it will not be imposed on them.
[right][snapback]95285[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Deism is not suited because it wont offer power to the ruler and it doesnt have large folowing in masses.The hidden Demiurg of deism doesnt justify their ruling in eyes of the masses.
Christianism is to full of greco-roman maximalist influences(trinity,saints,idols etc),some even belive that islam is the judaism of non-jews( nevermind jews have no future among muslim fanatics).
And they are folowers of Constantine-one god,one empire,one ruler.This semitic ideea ( of absolute and gelous ruler) is very well imbebed in their christian minds and the neo-christianism( islam i mean) is their choice.
The assyro-babilonian rulers were absolutist whit their subjects and gelous whit their harem ;this ideea expand in the metaphysical ground rezulting absolutist and gelous monotheism.
Following the sort of patterns you've made, Deism would be the minimalism of Greco-Roman philosophy streams. <i>Plus</i>: in Deism, the Nature's God is consistent with NA native American Grand Spirit.
Not even American atheists and agnostics could be against Deism I think, as it is an individual's private religion and presents no dogma, nothing but good conduct is expected. What exists in another's mind - concerning the existence of the Deist Creator - cannot be offensive to atheists and agnostics, since it will not be imposed on them.
[right][snapback]95285[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Deism is not suited because it wont offer power to the ruler and it doesnt have large folowing in masses.The hidden Demiurg of deism doesnt justify their ruling in eyes of the masses.
Christianism is to full of greco-roman maximalist influences(trinity,saints,idols etc),some even belive that islam is the judaism of non-jews( nevermind jews have no future among muslim fanatics).
And they are folowers of Constantine-one god,one empire,one ruler.This semitic ideea ( of absolute and gelous ruler) is very well imbebed in their christian minds and the neo-christianism( islam i mean) is their choice.
The assyro-babilonian rulers were absolutist whit their subjects and gelous whit their harem ;this ideea expand in the metaphysical ground rezulting absolutist and gelous monotheism.