1. http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/04/bri...-offensive.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Thursday, April 23, 2009
<b>stealth-christism rampant: The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin</b>
apr 23rd, 2009
the christists can't resist.
what this needs is the following:
a. as shahyrar said, a hindu antidefamation league
b. use RTI to find out who is doing this
c. sue them under the section 529A (?) serious offense causing hurt to religious sentiments
interestingly, arjun singh (wife is a christist) did all this in the HRD, but now is moaning because his offspring didn't get tickets. same thing happened to another old soldier for the nehru dynasty, natwar singh. when the iraq oil scam came up, he was made the scapegoat and put out to pasture. i am predicting the same fate will befall today's flunkeys-in-chief, manmohan singh and p. chidambaram. couldn't happen to two more deserving candidates.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@
The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin
The new coins carry the same cross as was seen last year on Rs 2 coins. The RBI alleges that the cross shows "unity in diversity." However, it is unable to give an explanation as to from what angle does the cross project this message.
http://indianrealist.wordpress.com/2009/04...-cross-is-back/
The central government has issued a new 10 Rs coin with a with 'Christian Crusader's Cross' on one side.
Two years back, the UPA government had issued two Rs coin with ditto same Christian crusader cross on one side. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi had taken up this issue to the people in his December 2007 Gujarat assembly election rallies(Watch video).After much protest this coin was withdrawn.
Now again, the central government has come with Rs 10 coin depicting ditto same 'Jerusalam cross.' It is same story again as was the case couple of years ago with 2 rupee coin.
http://deshgujarat.com/2009/04/12/jerusala...-on-rs-10-coin/
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 4/23/2009 07:59:00 PM 0 comments<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The last link (deshgujarat) has a comment pointing out how the 10 Rs coin also is marked "2006" not 2009. So was this 10 Rs minted for circulation in 2006? Are they trying to reissue a discontinued batch? Is that legal?
Or is the image a reconstruction of the coins to be issued this year?
About this statement by Nizhal:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>stealth-christism rampant: The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin</b>
apr 23rd, 2009
the christists can't resist.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Nothing to do with an inability to resist. The case of the 2 Rs coin (and this one, if applicable) is done very consciously.
From the insane christian POV, it serves both as a war (crusade) declaration AND as a means to 'break the spiritual strength' of a pagan nation. They believe it is one of the steps that will facilitate the conversion of a pagan country. The notion goes back to the supposed Labarum vision (cross sign) - accompanied by the words "in this sign you will conquer" - which christians alleged Constantine had on the eve of an important war. Ignoring the non-event which historians have disproved, Consty *did* mint Roman coins with the cross sign on them. And of course, after Constantine, every christian nation going to war used some type of cross on their bloody standards in the belief this would ensure christianism's victory.
Hindus should study christianism and christian history so that they don't continue taking such matters lightly. The Romans aren't laughing, for one thing.
Repeat: christoterrorism did the same in Korea too:
http://www.buddhapia.com/eng/tedesco/2.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->1996.
The swastika - for centuries a symbol of good fortune throughout Asia, and also a Buddhist symbol of the same - is replaced on many flagpoles in Seoul with crucifixes.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Two years later, the christian terrorists in Korea would not allow traditional Korean symbols back, like the sacred Dragon:
http://www.buddhapia.com/eng/tedesco/3.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->1998. The government revokes its intention to engrave a dragon image on the handle of National Seal due to a strong protest by Korean Christians. Christians assert the ¡°animal symbolizes Satan¡± and should not be used in an image representing our nation.¡¯<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->(A question about the crucifix on Seoul's flagpoles. Isn't it that crucifixes are generally not protestant but catholic? I could be wrong, but IIRC, a crucifix is a cross with a jeebus nailed to it. I read that in protestant Tudor England, papists=catholics were identified by the idolatry of a crucifix. During Henry the 8's son Edward's time, catholics had to hide their crucifixes, and if any were caught in public with a crucifix attached to a chain around their necks - as opposed to a plain cross - they would end up in Trouble or in The Tower.)
More links leading from the above:
- http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2009/04/ra...ent-remote.html
<b>The rascally central government, remote-controlled by a European Christian has dared to issue new 10 Rupee coins with the cross.</b>
- http://indianrealist.wordpress.com/2009/04...-cross-is-back/
<b>The Crusadersâ Cross is Back!</b>
- http://deshgujarat.com/2009/04/12/jerusala...-on-rs-10-coin/
If the current 10 Rs is indeed marred with another cross, then what Dhu said, when christoterrorism did it last time with the 2 Rs coin, still holds:
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Mar 19 2007, 11:58 PM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Mar 19 2007, 11:58 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->This coin is a clear declaration of war.[right][snapback]65852[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
2. Was this already brought up?
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/04/bri...-offensive.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wednesday, April 01, 2009
<b>Brits Ban Ad With Pope as 'Offensive'</b>
While kowtowing to the Londonistan lobby, the Brits are also simultaneously learning to bend over again and again, as required.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/508...ert-banned.html
Welcome to the Brave New World of 'sekoolarism', where a govt ban is just a phonecall away.
Posted by san at 4/01/2009 06:00:00 PM
Labels: europe, media, pseudo-secular, uk
<b>2 comments:</b>
Chris said...
  Not fair! The ad is in pretty poor taste and deserves to be taken off. It would have caused a riot in some parts of the world.
  4/02/2009 12:27 AM
blogger said...
  Are we sure that picture is not really from an actual underground nightclub in Vatican? Hypocrite Brits...
  4/02/2009 8:14 AM<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree with "Chris" (1st comment). The image is just of the deceased pope dancing with a woman, whereby the deceased is leaning in suggestively as for a kiss. The catholics (and no one else) consider the pope the 'vicar of christ', not jeebus itself.
Meanwhile, all the pseculars are up in arms to preserve the 'freedom to screech and scrawl' of MF Hussain and some Indian christian who would have that their drawings of jeebusjehovallah, mohammed and mary actually depict Hindu Gods doing repugnant christoislamic things (bestiality and stuff).
Another thing is that it was never Hindus who denigrated christoislamism's non-existent scare-monsters, but christos and islamis who attempted their pathetic best to do so to Hindu Gods. Likewise it was not Hindus who made the 'offensive' British advert of the pope. Besides, considering how many earlier popes were into orgies of sex, and some were FACTUALLY paedophiles and rapists <- compared to depicting such facts, the British ad is rather tame in showing John Paul merely dancing with a woman showing a bit of leg.
Hmmm, the Telegraph UK seems to has taken the image off. Possibly catholics clocked overtime to get the image removed from the Telegraph; maybe it was the same kind of catholic fascist brigade that in America pulled the BBC's documentary on Mary (catholics go nutters if they hear from theologians that the belief in Mary's immaculate conception has no historical basis, or hear from protestants that Mary is supposed to be 'just a human').
A copy of the image, can judge for oneself:
<img src='http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v130/indiaforum/pope220_1376622f.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Thursday, April 23, 2009
<b>stealth-christism rampant: The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin</b>
apr 23rd, 2009
the christists can't resist.
what this needs is the following:
a. as shahyrar said, a hindu antidefamation league
b. use RTI to find out who is doing this
c. sue them under the section 529A (?) serious offense causing hurt to religious sentiments
interestingly, arjun singh (wife is a christist) did all this in the HRD, but now is moaning because his offspring didn't get tickets. same thing happened to another old soldier for the nehru dynasty, natwar singh. when the iraq oil scam came up, he was made the scapegoat and put out to pasture. i am predicting the same fate will befall today's flunkeys-in-chief, manmohan singh and p. chidambaram. couldn't happen to two more deserving candidates.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@
The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin
The new coins carry the same cross as was seen last year on Rs 2 coins. The RBI alleges that the cross shows "unity in diversity." However, it is unable to give an explanation as to from what angle does the cross project this message.
http://indianrealist.wordpress.com/2009/04...-cross-is-back/
The central government has issued a new 10 Rs coin with a with 'Christian Crusader's Cross' on one side.
Two years back, the UPA government had issued two Rs coin with ditto same Christian crusader cross on one side. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi had taken up this issue to the people in his December 2007 Gujarat assembly election rallies(Watch video).After much protest this coin was withdrawn.
Now again, the central government has come with Rs 10 coin depicting ditto same 'Jerusalam cross.' It is same story again as was the case couple of years ago with 2 rupee coin.
http://deshgujarat.com/2009/04/12/jerusala...-on-rs-10-coin/
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 4/23/2009 07:59:00 PM 0 comments<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The last link (deshgujarat) has a comment pointing out how the 10 Rs coin also is marked "2006" not 2009. So was this 10 Rs minted for circulation in 2006? Are they trying to reissue a discontinued batch? Is that legal?
Or is the image a reconstruction of the coins to be issued this year?
About this statement by Nizhal:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>stealth-christism rampant: The Crusaders' Cross is Back on Rs. 10 coin</b>
apr 23rd, 2009
the christists can't resist.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Nothing to do with an inability to resist. The case of the 2 Rs coin (and this one, if applicable) is done very consciously.
From the insane christian POV, it serves both as a war (crusade) declaration AND as a means to 'break the spiritual strength' of a pagan nation. They believe it is one of the steps that will facilitate the conversion of a pagan country. The notion goes back to the supposed Labarum vision (cross sign) - accompanied by the words "in this sign you will conquer" - which christians alleged Constantine had on the eve of an important war. Ignoring the non-event which historians have disproved, Consty *did* mint Roman coins with the cross sign on them. And of course, after Constantine, every christian nation going to war used some type of cross on their bloody standards in the belief this would ensure christianism's victory.
Hindus should study christianism and christian history so that they don't continue taking such matters lightly. The Romans aren't laughing, for one thing.
Repeat: christoterrorism did the same in Korea too:
http://www.buddhapia.com/eng/tedesco/2.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->1996.
The swastika - for centuries a symbol of good fortune throughout Asia, and also a Buddhist symbol of the same - is replaced on many flagpoles in Seoul with crucifixes.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Two years later, the christian terrorists in Korea would not allow traditional Korean symbols back, like the sacred Dragon:
http://www.buddhapia.com/eng/tedesco/3.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->1998. The government revokes its intention to engrave a dragon image on the handle of National Seal due to a strong protest by Korean Christians. Christians assert the ¡°animal symbolizes Satan¡± and should not be used in an image representing our nation.¡¯<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->(A question about the crucifix on Seoul's flagpoles. Isn't it that crucifixes are generally not protestant but catholic? I could be wrong, but IIRC, a crucifix is a cross with a jeebus nailed to it. I read that in protestant Tudor England, papists=catholics were identified by the idolatry of a crucifix. During Henry the 8's son Edward's time, catholics had to hide their crucifixes, and if any were caught in public with a crucifix attached to a chain around their necks - as opposed to a plain cross - they would end up in Trouble or in The Tower.)
More links leading from the above:
- http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2009/04/ra...ent-remote.html
<b>The rascally central government, remote-controlled by a European Christian has dared to issue new 10 Rupee coins with the cross.</b>
- http://indianrealist.wordpress.com/2009/04...-cross-is-back/
<b>The Crusadersâ Cross is Back!</b>
- http://deshgujarat.com/2009/04/12/jerusala...-on-rs-10-coin/
If the current 10 Rs is indeed marred with another cross, then what Dhu said, when christoterrorism did it last time with the 2 Rs coin, still holds:
<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Mar 19 2007, 11:58 PM-->QUOTE(dhu @ Mar 19 2007, 11:58 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->This coin is a clear declaration of war.[right][snapback]65852[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
2. Was this already brought up?
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/04/bri...-offensive.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Wednesday, April 01, 2009
<b>Brits Ban Ad With Pope as 'Offensive'</b>
While kowtowing to the Londonistan lobby, the Brits are also simultaneously learning to bend over again and again, as required.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/508...ert-banned.html
Welcome to the Brave New World of 'sekoolarism', where a govt ban is just a phonecall away.
Posted by san at 4/01/2009 06:00:00 PM
Labels: europe, media, pseudo-secular, uk
<b>2 comments:</b>
Chris said...
  Not fair! The ad is in pretty poor taste and deserves to be taken off. It would have caused a riot in some parts of the world.
  4/02/2009 12:27 AM
blogger said...
  Are we sure that picture is not really from an actual underground nightclub in Vatican? Hypocrite Brits...
  4/02/2009 8:14 AM<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree with "Chris" (1st comment). The image is just of the deceased pope dancing with a woman, whereby the deceased is leaning in suggestively as for a kiss. The catholics (and no one else) consider the pope the 'vicar of christ', not jeebus itself.
Meanwhile, all the pseculars are up in arms to preserve the 'freedom to screech and scrawl' of MF Hussain and some Indian christian who would have that their drawings of jeebusjehovallah, mohammed and mary actually depict Hindu Gods doing repugnant christoislamic things (bestiality and stuff).
Another thing is that it was never Hindus who denigrated christoislamism's non-existent scare-monsters, but christos and islamis who attempted their pathetic best to do so to Hindu Gods. Likewise it was not Hindus who made the 'offensive' British advert of the pope. Besides, considering how many earlier popes were into orgies of sex, and some were FACTUALLY paedophiles and rapists <- compared to depicting such facts, the British ad is rather tame in showing John Paul merely dancing with a woman showing a bit of leg.
Hmmm, the Telegraph UK seems to has taken the image off. Possibly catholics clocked overtime to get the image removed from the Telegraph; maybe it was the same kind of catholic fascist brigade that in America pulled the BBC's documentary on Mary (catholics go nutters if they hear from theologians that the belief in Mary's immaculate conception has no historical basis, or hear from protestants that Mary is supposed to be 'just a human').
A copy of the image, can judge for oneself:
<img src='http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v130/indiaforum/pope220_1376622f.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />