Historicity of Jesus - 2

[HareKrishna]

<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+May 12 2009, 10:24 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ May 12 2009, 10:24 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The title King of the Gypsies has been claimed or given over the centuries to many different people. It is both culturally and geographically specific. It may be inherited, acquired by acclamation or action, or simply claimed. The extent of the power associated with the title varied; it might be limited to a small group in a specific place, or many people over large areas. In some cases the claim was clearly a public relations exercise. As the term Gypsy is also used in many different ways the King of the Gypsies may be someone with no connection with the Roma.

It has also been suggested that <b>in places where they were persecuted by local authorities the "King of the Gypsies" is an individual, usually of low standing, who places himself in the risky position of an ad hoc liaison between the Roma and the gaje (non-Roma). The arrest of such a "King" limited the harm to the Roma. </b>[1]  link<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[right][snapback]97172[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Cioaba,king of gipsy
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ro/t...x-IonCioaba.jpg

Emperor Julian of gipsy
http://www.ablog.ro/img/200707/23416.jpg

Madalin Voicu,known gipsy politician
http://www.adevarul.ro/editor_files/Image/...cu-interviu.jpg

boyars of gipsy
http://aghiazma.files.wordpress.com/2009/0...11438802882.jpg
http://images.google.ro/imgres?imgurl=http...t%3D63%26um%3D1