Historicity of Jesus - 2

[acharya]

<!--QuoteBegin-dhu+May 22 2009, 07:56 AM-->QUOTE(dhu @ May 22 2009, 07:56 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->I've set up a quick site:

http://ascendantasia.blogspot.com/
[right][snapback]97642[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->How can one speak about 'ancient' India, when one is talking about a text composed during the 'middle ages'? Here, 'antiquity' does not have a particular time-frame as its reference. Instead, it is civilizational: compared to the 'ancient Greeks' (of about 2500 years ago), the Indian civilization of about 700 years ago is more 'ancient' (i.e. more primitive). Of course, this is not made explicit but it is the only possible interpretation, especially in light of their conclusions.
http://s-n-balagangadhara.sulekha.com/bl...ssance.htm<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

What was the reason to post this balu article in the blog.
Can you explain