I think the site is detailed enough for now. Especially, for most people seeing this material for the first time, it would probably be overwhelming. I am not so concerned about Judaism, except that with Indians, you need to show that there are no loose ends, otherwise they will dismiss off-hand. I want to add a table of parallels from CM to give more clarity.
Also, an audio file that I had where atwill discussed the cannibal mary parallel.
There was a balagangadhara audio file which Acharya posted in the Sociology thread (intraforum link). If anyone has this, can they upload to rapidshare or esnips. I no longer have this. This is a full hour talk by Balagangadhara and gives needed perspective about difference between Religions and Traditions. Otherwise, people tend to apply equal equal. Especially believers and seculars.
I don't want to overwhelm with too much information.
Examples to be used:
1. Nonindian :
- Construction of Mormon revisionist history for native americans by British colonizer
2. Indian :
- sanjaychoudhry's writeup on Gandhi as colonial sepoy (this maybe too radical for most Indians).
- Arya Samaj could offend.
- Revisionist Khalistanism is too hard to understand.
- AIT/Martial/Criminal caste psyops too controversial for most.
- Macaulayite Colonial education seems to the only reasonable topic. But very difficult to convey concisely.
The Judaism portion is uninteresting to Indians, Chinese.. Euros are obsessed with it for obvious reasons. Blacks, per my youtube experience, are interested solely because they associate Judaism with the dethroning of Egypt, which is personal for them. I will leave in for now so that Indian seculars cannot cry about loose end.
Need to show connection between modernity, secularism, and all other niceties -with- Christianity.. So if christinaity is war propganda, all downstrean variants automatically become suspect as to stated intent and actual intent... Balagangadhara transcript will work to this end....
Also, an audio file that I had where atwill discussed the cannibal mary parallel.
There was a balagangadhara audio file which Acharya posted in the Sociology thread (intraforum link). If anyone has this, can they upload to rapidshare or esnips. I no longer have this. This is a full hour talk by Balagangadhara and gives needed perspective about difference between Religions and Traditions. Otherwise, people tend to apply equal equal. Especially believers and seculars.
I don't want to overwhelm with too much information.
Examples to be used:
1. Nonindian :
- Construction of Mormon revisionist history for native americans by British colonizer
2. Indian :
- sanjaychoudhry's writeup on Gandhi as colonial sepoy (this maybe too radical for most Indians).
- Arya Samaj could offend.
- Revisionist Khalistanism is too hard to understand.
- AIT/Martial/Criminal caste psyops too controversial for most.
- Macaulayite Colonial education seems to the only reasonable topic. But very difficult to convey concisely.
The Judaism portion is uninteresting to Indians, Chinese.. Euros are obsessed with it for obvious reasons. Blacks, per my youtube experience, are interested solely because they associate Judaism with the dethroning of Egypt, which is personal for them. I will leave in for now so that Indian seculars cannot cry about loose end.
Need to show connection between modernity, secularism, and all other niceties -with- Christianity.. So if christinaity is war propganda, all downstrean variants automatically become suspect as to stated intent and actual intent... Balagangadhara transcript will work to this end....