para 1
-The crime of the native is that he has been normed as deviant.
-The native can be immediately problematized through the device of normativity.
-That is, normativity is an instant demonizing mechanism.
-The "narratives" of a normative culture "are powerless to teach"
-That is, they cannot instruct.
-Propaganda does not instruct.
-It only operates at surface level to mold the actions of the mass, indeed it creates the "masses"
-This is not true in a non-normative heathen nonideological culture
-The normative culture transforms the practices and traditions of the heathen culture into instances of propaganda, into ideology.
-Ideological differences are posited between the Canaanite native and his ideologically normed alterego, the Israelite- the agent of ideological-historical change.
-The native culture is instantly problematized.
-Once this narrative has been imposed it must be given an ad hoc historical explanation and justification.
-This is a point reinterpretation in time. eg obviously, there were no prophets to British rule.
-The british rule invented prophets to their rule by backprojection through history.
-This is the interpretative history paradigm of herodotus which has been deemed as problematic by the ghent group in the article 'do indians need a past or a history'.
-the native is innocent
-but he has been problematized as deviant by the colonial power by applying normativity.
-the native has been turned into a criminal
-all land belongs to the colonizer, the sovereign, and the monotheist deity _by principle and through theology_.
-The Lord God is a Creator and therefore owns his Creation
-the believer has, in turn, thus been apportioned the land by the act of believing.
-the nonbeliever native is instantly turned into a criminal occupier of native land by the act of nonbelieving
-the heathen does not own his creation by the act of creating.
-transubstantiation is the act of instantly transforming, a miracle
-but it is actually a problematizing act
-the individual? is bidden to consume his messiah, his deliverer
-he is made to turn himself into a criminal and this is leverage
-The crime of the native is that he has been normed as deviant.
-The native can be immediately problematized through the device of normativity.
-That is, normativity is an instant demonizing mechanism.
-The "narratives" of a normative culture "are powerless to teach"
-That is, they cannot instruct.
-Propaganda does not instruct.
-It only operates at surface level to mold the actions of the mass, indeed it creates the "masses"
-This is not true in a non-normative heathen nonideological culture
-The normative culture transforms the practices and traditions of the heathen culture into instances of propaganda, into ideology.
-Ideological differences are posited between the Canaanite native and his ideologically normed alterego, the Israelite- the agent of ideological-historical change.
-The native culture is instantly problematized.
-Once this narrative has been imposed it must be given an ad hoc historical explanation and justification.
-This is a point reinterpretation in time. eg obviously, there were no prophets to British rule.
-The british rule invented prophets to their rule by backprojection through history.
-This is the interpretative history paradigm of herodotus which has been deemed as problematic by the ghent group in the article 'do indians need a past or a history'.
-the native is innocent
-but he has been problematized as deviant by the colonial power by applying normativity.
-the native has been turned into a criminal
-all land belongs to the colonizer, the sovereign, and the monotheist deity _by principle and through theology_.
-The Lord God is a Creator and therefore owns his Creation
-the believer has, in turn, thus been apportioned the land by the act of believing.
-the nonbeliever native is instantly turned into a criminal occupier of native land by the act of nonbelieving
-the heathen does not own his creation by the act of creating.
-transubstantiation is the act of instantly transforming, a miracle
-but it is actually a problematizing act
-the individual? is bidden to consume his messiah, his deliverer
-he is made to turn himself into a criminal and this is leverage