<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Jun 21 2009, 10:55 PM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Jun 21 2009, 10:55 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Advani is not behaving or ever behaved like current appointed Prime Minister of India, who was holding Obama book all over UN building and when he met Obama he said, Please please please sign this book for my daughter.
Advani is full of pride, he may get party funds or support from Hotel-Motel Guju lobby of USA but he is not US stooge. Appointed Prime Minister is another story. He was joke of town during last UN meeting. Radio talk shows had field day on appointed Prime Minister of India.[right][snapback]99022[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->He can still be unwittingly used. If they push the right buttons.
The question is what's the likelihood of the US hedging their bets - the US has shown repeatedly in different parts of the globe that it is capable of this, and is interested in doing so in India's case too. Not unlikely that with the backhand, they'd attempt to sabotage the only opposition to their pet party, and with their forehand vote in the pet party (Congress).
Any meddling foreign power bent on messing up another nation (democracies are Easy, so are colourful revolutions) would not just be doing its best to 'promote' (push into power) the party of their choice but also to bore holes in the opposition.
The meddling in South America, Eastern Europe including Yugoslavia - all recent examples. And India's been manipulated in the past by the christoBritish vampire, I mean empire, so why not remote-control manipulation by the US govt today?
<!--QuoteBegin-ravish+Jun 21 2009, 09:34 PM-->QUOTE(ravish @ Jun 21 2009, 09:34 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Mr Husky,
Do you really <b>believe</b> in what you have posted?
[right][snapback]99019[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What an interesting question and choice of verb, pro-ravishing ravish. So, how long have you been prone to belief, ravish? (Also called "faith" in christianism). Are you given to <i>believing</i> that you ask such questions? After all, only those who are into believing suspect others of being capable of "believing" too.
Psychologists and psych students may consider you an interesting case for psychoanalysis. IF is the wrong place though, therefore check yourself into Bedlam or wherever for receiving the kind of attention you obviously crave.
Advani is full of pride, he may get party funds or support from Hotel-Motel Guju lobby of USA but he is not US stooge. Appointed Prime Minister is another story. He was joke of town during last UN meeting. Radio talk shows had field day on appointed Prime Minister of India.[right][snapback]99022[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->He can still be unwittingly used. If they push the right buttons.
The question is what's the likelihood of the US hedging their bets - the US has shown repeatedly in different parts of the globe that it is capable of this, and is interested in doing so in India's case too. Not unlikely that with the backhand, they'd attempt to sabotage the only opposition to their pet party, and with their forehand vote in the pet party (Congress).
Any meddling foreign power bent on messing up another nation (democracies are Easy, so are colourful revolutions) would not just be doing its best to 'promote' (push into power) the party of their choice but also to bore holes in the opposition.
The meddling in South America, Eastern Europe including Yugoslavia - all recent examples. And India's been manipulated in the past by the christoBritish vampire, I mean empire, so why not remote-control manipulation by the US govt today?
<!--QuoteBegin-ravish+Jun 21 2009, 09:34 PM-->QUOTE(ravish @ Jun 21 2009, 09:34 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Mr Husky,
Do you really <b>believe</b> in what you have posted?
[right][snapback]99019[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->What an interesting question and choice of verb, pro-ravishing ravish. So, how long have you been prone to belief, ravish? (Also called "faith" in christianism). Are you given to <i>believing</i> that you ask such questions? After all, only those who are into believing suspect others of being capable of "believing" too.
Psychologists and psych students may consider you an interesting case for psychoanalysis. IF is the wrong place though, therefore check yourself into Bedlam or wherever for receiving the kind of attention you obviously crave.