I highlighted a line in bold red:
<!--QuoteBegin-Viren+Jun 29 2009, 08:35 PM-->QUOTE(Viren @ Jun 29 2009, 08:35 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Islamic body against legalising homosexuality
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->A leading Islamic seminary on Monday opposed Centre's move to repeal a controversial section of the penal law which criminalises homosexuality, saying unnatural sex is against the tenets of Islam.
"<b>Homosexuality is offence under Shariat Law and haram (prohibited) in Islam,</b>" Deputy Vice Chancellor of the Darul Uloom Deoband Maulana Abdul Khalik Madrasi said.
Madrasi also asked the government not to repeal section 377 of the Indian Penal Code which criminalises homosexuality.
His objection came a day after Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily [ Images ] said a decision on repealing the section would be taken only after <b>considering concerns of all sections of the society, including religious groups like the church.</b>
<b>Terming gay activities as crime, Maulana Salim Kasmi, Vice-President of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, said homosexuality is punishable under Islamic law and section 377 of IPC should not be tampered.</b> <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[right][snapback]99259[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
1. All-India Muslim Personal Law Board is confused, it thinks it's in Pukestan. But Bharatam is not an islamoronic country for them to dictate laws. They can threaten murder for homosexuality among the ummah (which will have the nice side-effect of a lot of the mullahs being islamically "taken out" - to put it in christo Mafioso manner), but they can't ban it in the country if the psecular state will for once actually be secular and repeal the christobritish laws.
Methinks the islamics are protesting too much: I suspect they are secretly afraid there will be an overt public show of islamic mullahs hanging out at gay bars with their islamic mullah boyfriends, pointing to Indian laws for how this is legally allowed.
2. Most 'curious'. When it comes to something the psecular cryptos in power know will irritate the christoislamis no end, they declare they will "consider the concerns" of the christoislamaniacs.
But when it directly concerns Hindu matters like Ramarsethu, Chidambaram Kovil and Amarnath they don't care at all but will go on drilling, taking over and obstructing.
<b>ADDED:</b> Another example:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/06/ant...epealed-by.html
<b>Anti-conversion laws to be repealed by new govt </b>
They are considering only the minority christoterrorists' opinions on that issue as well. The Dharmic majority wants to keep the anti-conversion laws.
The statement of "let's consider the church's concerns in the gay matter" is yet another strong indicator that it is christos that are in charge in the country.
When have they EVER considered Hindus' concerns? The gay thing is a non-issue for the general Dharmic society.
But at least for once, the church may find itself antagonised by the vocal psecular crowd. E.g. actors like Celina Jaitley, who - going by the TOI headline ads for her in the last weeks - has apparently recently decided her latest charitable cause will be "the gay people". As if rich gay youth in the Indian dance scene are the most desperate of the Indian population. Never mind suiciding farmers, malnourished infants, poor Hindu families whose kids are stolen "adopted" by christian terrorists in the west, the Hindu victims of christoislamic terrorism and of the institutionalised christian inquisition. <i>Of course</i> the Indian gay population 'must be' the most victimised of all - even though the majority Hindu society doesn't really care/get worked up about homosexuality and is not likely to do anything much to encourage or discourage it. The Iraqi and Egyptian gay scene is *actually* desperate for Celina's help (recently saw this in the news and a current events program respectively; there, gay people - mostly christian in Iraq, and islamic in Egypt - get murdered by their islamaniac brethren).
Anyway. Am guessing an interesting experiment is brewing: Something useful may come of airbrain actors after all. Because such fundy psecularism - such as Celina's "I need a cause that pushes the limits to make people remember I exist" - <i>can</i> eventually bite back christoism (if the persons are so far gone into the psecular mindset that they're out of church control now).
Can only wait to see if this is what will happen, and use it to work out just how "psecular" and "secularly non-religious" the psecular twats really are, or else, how "christian". That is, will she grow silent when she finds out the only ones to rain on her gay parade are the christoislamics? Or will she push on for gay rights even when she discovers there are no Hindus to antagonise? (A valid question to ask, since psecularism in the Indian context was originally created and programmed to be anti-Hindu, and specifically <i>not</i> anti-christoislamic.) There could be a small bias-factor to this experiment though. If Celina is a christian herself - going by her first name, this seems possible - she may cave. But perhaps the christian distraction of the psecular bug bit her hard enough and she's wandered over into completely independent psecularism, beyond christian control.
It may turn out to be entertaining, watching the pseculars and the church at loggerheads. Maybe psecularism will learn that the most communal fundamentalists are their best friends: the christoislamorons. Welcome to the islamic theocracy of jeebus: where the about 80% slaves (Dharmics) are oppressed by christoislamipsecular minority.
<!--QuoteBegin-Viren+Jun 29 2009, 08:35 PM-->QUOTE(Viren @ Jun 29 2009, 08:35 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Islamic body against legalising homosexuality
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->A leading Islamic seminary on Monday opposed Centre's move to repeal a controversial section of the penal law which criminalises homosexuality, saying unnatural sex is against the tenets of Islam.
"<b>Homosexuality is offence under Shariat Law and haram (prohibited) in Islam,</b>" Deputy Vice Chancellor of the Darul Uloom Deoband Maulana Abdul Khalik Madrasi said.
Madrasi also asked the government not to repeal section 377 of the Indian Penal Code which criminalises homosexuality.
His objection came a day after Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily [ Images ] said a decision on repealing the section would be taken only after <b>considering concerns of all sections of the society, including religious groups like the church.</b>
<b>Terming gay activities as crime, Maulana Salim Kasmi, Vice-President of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, said homosexuality is punishable under Islamic law and section 377 of IPC should not be tampered.</b> <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
[right][snapback]99259[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
1. All-India Muslim Personal Law Board is confused, it thinks it's in Pukestan. But Bharatam is not an islamoronic country for them to dictate laws. They can threaten murder for homosexuality among the ummah (which will have the nice side-effect of a lot of the mullahs being islamically "taken out" - to put it in christo Mafioso manner), but they can't ban it in the country if the psecular state will for once actually be secular and repeal the christobritish laws.
Methinks the islamics are protesting too much: I suspect they are secretly afraid there will be an overt public show of islamic mullahs hanging out at gay bars with their islamic mullah boyfriends, pointing to Indian laws for how this is legally allowed.
2. Most 'curious'. When it comes to something the psecular cryptos in power know will irritate the christoislamis no end, they declare they will "consider the concerns" of the christoislamaniacs.
But when it directly concerns Hindu matters like Ramarsethu, Chidambaram Kovil and Amarnath they don't care at all but will go on drilling, taking over and obstructing.
<b>ADDED:</b> Another example:
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/06/ant...epealed-by.html
<b>Anti-conversion laws to be repealed by new govt </b>
They are considering only the minority christoterrorists' opinions on that issue as well. The Dharmic majority wants to keep the anti-conversion laws.
The statement of "let's consider the church's concerns in the gay matter" is yet another strong indicator that it is christos that are in charge in the country.
When have they EVER considered Hindus' concerns? The gay thing is a non-issue for the general Dharmic society.
But at least for once, the church may find itself antagonised by the vocal psecular crowd. E.g. actors like Celina Jaitley, who - going by the TOI headline ads for her in the last weeks - has apparently recently decided her latest charitable cause will be "the gay people". As if rich gay youth in the Indian dance scene are the most desperate of the Indian population. Never mind suiciding farmers, malnourished infants, poor Hindu families whose kids are stolen "adopted" by christian terrorists in the west, the Hindu victims of christoislamic terrorism and of the institutionalised christian inquisition. <i>Of course</i> the Indian gay population 'must be' the most victimised of all - even though the majority Hindu society doesn't really care/get worked up about homosexuality and is not likely to do anything much to encourage or discourage it. The Iraqi and Egyptian gay scene is *actually* desperate for Celina's help (recently saw this in the news and a current events program respectively; there, gay people - mostly christian in Iraq, and islamic in Egypt - get murdered by their islamaniac brethren).
Anyway. Am guessing an interesting experiment is brewing: Something useful may come of airbrain actors after all. Because such fundy psecularism - such as Celina's "I need a cause that pushes the limits to make people remember I exist" - <i>can</i> eventually bite back christoism (if the persons are so far gone into the psecular mindset that they're out of church control now).
Can only wait to see if this is what will happen, and use it to work out just how "psecular" and "secularly non-religious" the psecular twats really are, or else, how "christian". That is, will she grow silent when she finds out the only ones to rain on her gay parade are the christoislamics? Or will she push on for gay rights even when she discovers there are no Hindus to antagonise? (A valid question to ask, since psecularism in the Indian context was originally created and programmed to be anti-Hindu, and specifically <i>not</i> anti-christoislamic.) There could be a small bias-factor to this experiment though. If Celina is a christian herself - going by her first name, this seems possible - she may cave. But perhaps the christian distraction of the psecular bug bit her hard enough and she's wandered over into completely independent psecularism, beyond christian control.
It may turn out to be entertaining, watching the pseculars and the church at loggerheads. Maybe psecularism will learn that the most communal fundamentalists are their best friends: the christoislamorons. Welcome to the islamic theocracy of jeebus: where the about 80% slaves (Dharmics) are oppressed by christoislamipsecular minority.