01-18-2005, 08:33 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->By adopting casteism<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think we are back to square one. I do not understand what this phrase means. One must realize that the prime promoter of caste in India is the Government of India. The GOvernment asks personal questions regarding ones caste and insists on pain of penalties that you answer such question regarding caste. I would much rather the government get out of the caste business and not even use caste as a criterion for help.
A preponderance of doctors in the US (of Indian origin) are Kammas from Andhra Pradesh. Does it mean that the Kamma community is casteist. In fact i refuse to accept your basic premise that the Sankaracharya order is casteist
I think we are back to square one. I do not understand what this phrase means. One must realize that the prime promoter of caste in India is the Government of India. The GOvernment asks personal questions regarding ones caste and insists on pain of penalties that you answer such question regarding caste. I would much rather the government get out of the caste business and not even use caste as a criterion for help.
A preponderance of doctors in the US (of Indian origin) are Kammas from Andhra Pradesh. Does it mean that the Kamma community is casteist. In fact i refuse to accept your basic premise that the Sankaracharya order is casteist