07-14-2009, 02:48 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-HareKrishna+Jul 13 2009, 02:12 AM-->QUOTE(HareKrishna @ Jul 13 2009, 02:12 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->When Ashoka really lived acording whit the theory above?
If Gupta lived in Maurya times the who ruled in 300-500AD in their place?
This theory bring a chain of changes.I read more about it.It says that Pataliputra was not on Gange but in Afganistan and Buddha lived in that area(the first buddhist documents came from there not from Gange).
[right][snapback]99651[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is nalanda also in Afganistan
If Gupta lived in Maurya times the who ruled in 300-500AD in their place?
This theory bring a chain of changes.I read more about it.It says that Pataliputra was not on Gange but in Afganistan and Buddha lived in that area(the first buddhist documents came from there not from Gange).
[right][snapback]99651[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is nalanda also in Afganistan