Ancient Indian History

[HareKrishna]

<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Jul 14 2009, 02:48 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Jul 14 2009, 02:48 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-HareKrishna+Jul 13 2009, 02:12 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(HareKrishna @ Jul 13 2009, 02:12 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->When Ashoka really lived acording whit the theory above?
If Gupta lived in Maurya times the who ruled in 300-500AD in their place?
This theory bring a chain of changes.I read more about it.It says that Pataliputra was not on Gange but in Afganistan and Buddha lived in that area(the first buddhist documents came from there not from Gange).
[right][snapback]99651[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is nalanda also in Afganistan
[right][snapback]99653[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
my mistake.
I confused whit another theory which i posted some time ago.Maybe someone will make an opinion about the 3 links from bellow.


Here it is:
Jan 10 2009, 10:44 PM

I found an article that claim that Asoka was Diodotus,his capital was in Patali(in Afganistan) not Patna in Bihar;that Afganistan was inhabited by indians and Buddha was from there.
http://controversialhistory.blogspot.com...-myth.html

http://www.ranajitpal.com

http://www.ranajitpal.com/zoroaster.html


Who is Diodotus - Greek Myth
Ashoka is Diodotus
Magadha, Palibothra and Jones' Blunder
The Palace of Palibothra may be under the ruins of Patali
Gotama Buddha and the Nepalese Bluff in World History
An India within Iran
Fuhrer's Fraud in the Epigraphy and Archaeology of India and Nepal
Spread of Early Buddhism - Into Iran or Out of it?
D. Schlumberger On the Origin of Greco-Buddhist Art