08-02-2009, 05:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2009, 05:35 PM by HareKrishna.)
Husky,Jun 18 2009, 09:57 PM Wrote:ÂElst is wrong.
 18 Jun 2009
NEVER a dialogue with christianism. Death first.
pt the other's terms, a "Fight you for it".
It's like the americanism "over my dead body".
[right][snapback]98901[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
Elst was acused on spreading hate against muslims and cristians.He response was a apeal to dialogue and democratic petition-like requests.
In a way this is true.Communism didnt fall as much from weapon offensive as from mind ofensive.
because this ideologies are viruses of the mind there is first a battle of minds and in the second place a battle of weapons .How to convince cristo-muslims that their ideology is immoral and wrong?
Weapons must be used for containing immoral ideologies just like communism was contained by americans.
Elst also have wright for putting more on criticism of islam.Cristianity suffered criticism from 500 years and their immoral behaviour is well known.But islam suffered barely 30 years of criticism and its immoral deeds are less known.
Dialogue doesnt mean searching for a fake peace but exposing their immoralites in their face .If they want dialogue(if...) then they have to deal whit that first.