08-21-2009, 10:07 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Â Â However, pursuing this line of thought was impossible for
  Whiston. To do so, he would have had to accept that both Jesus
  and Josephus were in error because they each "saw" something that
  could not have happened in 70 C.E. To Whiston, Jesus could not err,
  by definition, because he was God. Likewise, to Whiston, as to so
  many Christian scholars, Josephus could not be mistaken because
  his history records God's handiwork.
  This is a demonstration of the power of the combination of the
  two works. The belief that they came from two distinct sources creates
  the effect that they demonstrate the supernatural, which is to
  say, Jesus' power of prophecy. <b>The New Testament reveals the true
  "Son of God" because Christ's predictions come true. A "historian"
  records them. </b>Josephus' histories must be accurate because they
  record the works of God. Jesus predicts the events that Josephus sees.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->