IMO. It's the same as today: virulent islamania trying to take over and carve little TSPs in Bharatam. But just like it couldn't be so successful in such a short period of time as when a christian govt is now in power helping it, same with the Brits who carefully helped it along back then.
The same background situation becomes apparent when reading IIRC Aurobindo's writings on when Brits were splitting Bharatam's Bangladesha into Hindu Bengal and islamaniac Bengal.
The islamaniac willingness is and has certainly always been there, but it is facilitated by calculating christianism which directs the blundering, hacking weapon of islamania into one that cuts right at the vital organs. Christoislamism.
Else why does it seem like islamism otherwise takes centuries to achieve the same sort of successes (and then too incomplete successes) that it achieves within a much shorter span of time and in a more complete form when christianism is in charge?
<b>ADDED:</b> Christianism in power does 2 things:
- it enables, encourages and empowers islamism,
- while it simultaneously disables Hindu Dharma's fight against islamism, and HD's natural immunity against terrorism and subversion. Christianism achieves this last through psecularism, through lying in the media and more general history-rewriting, etcetera.
Christianism just has the better brains, islamism will provide them with the necessary mercenaries. And reading christian missionary writings (before and even today) shows that they support islamania in the country. E.g. christian orgs' support from the very start of 1990 for an islamic Kashmir seceding from India (in fact, they presented it as separate). Christian lying international and local media spinning fictions on the Gujarat riots to protect islamic initiation and to simultaneously invent anti-islamic atrocities, while concealing what actually happened to the train and the actual numbers of the dead (just one example being Cedric "it's a genocide" Prakash and his fictions of many thousands of dead - and only of islamics - in the Godhra riots. And more recently REUTERS multiplied the numbers again as well, *even* after the truth had come out already). Christomedia essentially achieved the feat of turning the aggressors into the victims and forcing the Hindus into future inaction, turning secularising Hindus against Hindu victims and other Hindus directly affected. Islamism cannot do that, it never could. That's christianism.
You can see this also in the western institutions where every anti-Hindu islamaniac group has christian western collaboration and even representatives/panelists/vocalists to help them along. The brains are christianism which can only get a foot in India by neutralising Hindu resurgence by strengthening islamism and by increasing the latter's chances. Also islamism is necessary to deflect from the other conflict in India: christianism against Hindu Dharma (christobrits' christorule and christianisation process in India is also swept under the carpet, since it seems more invisible/secular in comparison to islamania). E.g. framing Hindus under Hindu terror and setting it up as something comparable to islamaniac terrorism is a christian tactic. RAND was already doing this outside India: branding normal Hindu orgs and secular Hindy political groups as terrorist groups "like Al Qaeda". Christogovt in India merely took this one step further by inventing Hindu terrorists for the Indian audience. Again, christianism gets invisibility.
The same background situation becomes apparent when reading IIRC Aurobindo's writings on when Brits were splitting Bharatam's Bangladesha into Hindu Bengal and islamaniac Bengal.
The islamaniac willingness is and has certainly always been there, but it is facilitated by calculating christianism which directs the blundering, hacking weapon of islamania into one that cuts right at the vital organs. Christoislamism.
Else why does it seem like islamism otherwise takes centuries to achieve the same sort of successes (and then too incomplete successes) that it achieves within a much shorter span of time and in a more complete form when christianism is in charge?
<b>ADDED:</b> Christianism in power does 2 things:
- it enables, encourages and empowers islamism,
- while it simultaneously disables Hindu Dharma's fight against islamism, and HD's natural immunity against terrorism and subversion. Christianism achieves this last through psecularism, through lying in the media and more general history-rewriting, etcetera.
Christianism just has the better brains, islamism will provide them with the necessary mercenaries. And reading christian missionary writings (before and even today) shows that they support islamania in the country. E.g. christian orgs' support from the very start of 1990 for an islamic Kashmir seceding from India (in fact, they presented it as separate). Christian lying international and local media spinning fictions on the Gujarat riots to protect islamic initiation and to simultaneously invent anti-islamic atrocities, while concealing what actually happened to the train and the actual numbers of the dead (just one example being Cedric "it's a genocide" Prakash and his fictions of many thousands of dead - and only of islamics - in the Godhra riots. And more recently REUTERS multiplied the numbers again as well, *even* after the truth had come out already). Christomedia essentially achieved the feat of turning the aggressors into the victims and forcing the Hindus into future inaction, turning secularising Hindus against Hindu victims and other Hindus directly affected. Islamism cannot do that, it never could. That's christianism.
You can see this also in the western institutions where every anti-Hindu islamaniac group has christian western collaboration and even representatives/panelists/vocalists to help them along. The brains are christianism which can only get a foot in India by neutralising Hindu resurgence by strengthening islamism and by increasing the latter's chances. Also islamism is necessary to deflect from the other conflict in India: christianism against Hindu Dharma (christobrits' christorule and christianisation process in India is also swept under the carpet, since it seems more invisible/secular in comparison to islamania). E.g. framing Hindus under Hindu terror and setting it up as something comparable to islamaniac terrorism is a christian tactic. RAND was already doing this outside India: branding normal Hindu orgs and secular Hindy political groups as terrorist groups "like Al Qaeda". Christogovt in India merely took this one step further by inventing Hindu terrorists for the Indian audience. Again, christianism gets invisibility.