Looks like the Euros are not fully integrated by Christendom ahem EU yet. More dashing comments:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->eurologist said...
<i>There was no "colonization of West Eurasia from India"</i>
<b>Then where, if not from India, do the West Asians and Europeans come from?</b> A second, later migration out of Africa? I don't think so. <b>And, between about 70K and 45K, there was no straight way north that did not lead through hundreds of miles of desert.</b>
Conversely, you have here DNA data that show Europeans to be close to Indians, and yet closer to a putative ancient subgroup.<b> And, all the data that show many of the Y-DNA strains original to Europeans still reside in India.</b>
The data don't fit a simplistic picture as Fig. 4, because there was 40,000 years of contact with West Asians, which in turn had contact with Europeans, and on top of that (but just on top) you have the IE migrations.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->eurologist said...
<i>There was no "colonization of West Eurasia from India"</i>
<b>Then where, if not from India, do the West Asians and Europeans come from?</b> A second, later migration out of Africa? I don't think so. <b>And, between about 70K and 45K, there was no straight way north that did not lead through hundreds of miles of desert.</b>
Conversely, you have here DNA data that show Europeans to be close to Indians, and yet closer to a putative ancient subgroup.<b> And, all the data that show many of the Y-DNA strains original to Europeans still reside in India.</b>
The data don't fit a simplistic picture as Fig. 4, because there was 40,000 years of contact with West Asians, which in turn had contact with Europeans, and on top of that (but just on top) you have the IE migrations.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->