10-03-2009, 01:04 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Oct 3 2009, 07:15 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Oct 3 2009, 07:15 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
So What?
This still means that genes were present in India atleast 40000 years ago and there was no migration into India.
Population and geography is well suited for India being the center of this diversity.
[right][snapback]101709[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We mixed the facts .Surely genes exist in India 40000 years ago but not
R1a which is way more recent.The part whit Middle east is my speculation.
The real wonder for me is how the R1a is the most diverse in the bosnians(Yugoslavia) and Chenchu(India) far away from each other.Nobody wonder about this until now.This for me raise the question about the real origin of R1a.
And nobody ask from where J2 originate (J2 form about 11% of indian Y gene) .J2 have the biggest frequency and variance in Kurdistan or nearby.
If you have information about their indian origin please provide.
So What?
This still means that genes were present in India atleast 40000 years ago and there was no migration into India.
Population and geography is well suited for India being the center of this diversity.
[right][snapback]101709[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
We mixed the facts .Surely genes exist in India 40000 years ago but not
R1a which is way more recent.The part whit Middle east is my speculation.
The real wonder for me is how the R1a is the most diverse in the bosnians(Yugoslavia) and Chenchu(India) far away from each other.Nobody wonder about this until now.This for me raise the question about the real origin of R1a.
And nobody ask from where J2 originate (J2 form about 11% of indian Y gene) .J2 have the biggest frequency and variance in Kurdistan or nearby.
If you have information about their indian origin please provide.