10-03-2009, 02:08 PM
I think this is related -
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/09/rah...cky-wicket.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> Ashok Kumar said...
  It seems Rahul's chamchas had failed him very miserably in this case.
  Aren't they supposed to plan/choreograph everything as to who are gonna ask questions and what are the questions. And if needed rent a crowd to ask only the prepared questions.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraudience
  The term also has use in a political context, when politicians seed press conferences, 'town hall' meetings, and similar events with an audience that is generally supportive of their political party, while denying access to supporters of opposing political parties.
  Are Rahul's chamchas so incompetent that they can't even orchestrate these PR stints?
  Is such incompetency inevitable when "negative selection" is the fundamental principle of recruitment.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_sele..._%28politics%29
  The person on the top of the hierarchy, wishing to remain in power forever, chooses his associates with the prime criterion of incompetence - they must not be competent enough to remove him from power. The associates do the same with those below them in the hierarchy, and the hierarchy is progressively filled with more and more incompetent people.
10/01/2009 12:38 PM
Blogger Deva said...
  Great comment.
  <b>Negative selection is reserved for the natives.</b> They are intelligent enough to know the colonizer wants sepoys and, thus, they will never tire from promoting the foreign agenda with utmost zeal. Thus, this idiotboy Rahul dutifully escorted Miliband on a poverty tour in Amethi and gave his "support" (thumbprint) to the nuke "deal".
  <b>When possible, they will also "positively select" the colonizer: </b>Rajiv succeeded in this while Nehru failed with Edwina. With time, they seem to be getting better with the positive selection!!!!!!!
  10/01/2009 2:07 PM<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/09/rah...cky-wicket.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--> Ashok Kumar said...
  It seems Rahul's chamchas had failed him very miserably in this case.
  Aren't they supposed to plan/choreograph everything as to who are gonna ask questions and what are the questions. And if needed rent a crowd to ask only the prepared questions.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraudience
  The term also has use in a political context, when politicians seed press conferences, 'town hall' meetings, and similar events with an audience that is generally supportive of their political party, while denying access to supporters of opposing political parties.
  Are Rahul's chamchas so incompetent that they can't even orchestrate these PR stints?
  Is such incompetency inevitable when "negative selection" is the fundamental principle of recruitment.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_sele..._%28politics%29
  The person on the top of the hierarchy, wishing to remain in power forever, chooses his associates with the prime criterion of incompetence - they must not be competent enough to remove him from power. The associates do the same with those below them in the hierarchy, and the hierarchy is progressively filled with more and more incompetent people.
10/01/2009 12:38 PM
Blogger Deva said...
  Great comment.
  <b>Negative selection is reserved for the natives.</b> They are intelligent enough to know the colonizer wants sepoys and, thus, they will never tire from promoting the foreign agenda with utmost zeal. Thus, this idiotboy Rahul dutifully escorted Miliband on a poverty tour in Amethi and gave his "support" (thumbprint) to the nuke "deal".
  <b>When possible, they will also "positively select" the colonizer: </b>Rajiv succeeded in this while Nehru failed with Edwina. With time, they seem to be getting better with the positive selection!!!!!!!
  10/01/2009 2:07 PM<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->