01-27-2005, 04:37 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->There can be no non-Brahman if Brahman is everything. The quote that Brahman is beyond the reality-unreality paradigm is only another way of saying that the human mind can not grasp Brahman in its entirety.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Gangajal, if brahman IS beyond reality, you couldn't use the term 'IS" in the sentence.
I think what you are trying to say is that brahman, maya and jagat and jivas are equally REAL. Calling something (which presumably 'is') beyond 'reality', is a fallacy.
Gangajal, if brahman IS beyond reality, you couldn't use the term 'IS" in the sentence.
I think what you are trying to say is that brahman, maya and jagat and jivas are equally REAL. Calling something (which presumably 'is') beyond 'reality', is a fallacy.