11-10-2009, 11:23 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Nov 11 2009, 02:14 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Nov 11 2009, 02:14 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-HareKrishna+Nov 10 2009, 06:03 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(HareKrishna @ Nov 10 2009, 06:03 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->http://www.nature.com/jhg/journal/v54/n1/f...jhg20082t3.html
R1a variance
India 0.38
Central Asia 0.24
Europe and near East 0.31
[right][snapback]102467[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
A racist study for a racist world view.
Only white supremacists would fund this kind of study on a population when there are millions of other population groups which needs study worldwide,
[right][snapback]102469[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
is not a racist study
It shows that variance(aka diversity) is greater in India ,hence India is the origin of R1a.
R1a variance
India 0.38
Central Asia 0.24
Europe and near East 0.31
[right][snapback]102467[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
A racist study for a racist world view.
Only white supremacists would fund this kind of study on a population when there are millions of other population groups which needs study worldwide,
[right][snapback]102469[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
is not a racist study
It shows that variance(aka diversity) is greater in India ,hence India is the origin of R1a.

