Lucid comments like the following are surprisingly common (but the clarity predictably breaks down when dealing with indian culture).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->parasar
Makes some sense. IMO, since northern Indians originate from southern India (this is disregarding recent back & forth) as well as east Asians originate from southern India, the latter two have greater connection. <b>Furthermore, as west Eurasians are a subset of Indians, </b>the north Indians are closer to west Eurasians (again this is disregarding recent back & forth).
I think both N & M mtDNA groups originated in southern India with the former spreading west and the latter spreading east. I am inclined to believe that N originated in south India after looking at U which is the oldest mtdna in Europe. I think it originated in Andhra or nearby. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I will post more of these....
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->parasar
Makes some sense. IMO, since northern Indians originate from southern India (this is disregarding recent back & forth) as well as east Asians originate from southern India, the latter two have greater connection. <b>Furthermore, as west Eurasians are a subset of Indians, </b>the north Indians are closer to west Eurasians (again this is disregarding recent back & forth).
I think both N & M mtDNA groups originated in southern India with the former spreading west and the latter spreading east. I am inclined to believe that N originated in south India after looking at U which is the oldest mtdna in Europe. I think it originated in Andhra or nearby. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I will post more of these....