What DNA Says About Aryan Invasion Theory -2

[dhu]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spr...omo_sapiens.jpg

Above is a mainstream image, made without an (overt) AIT agenda (which animates a greater part of academia than usually recognized). Few things to note:

-100K for Levant with only a 40K entry into Europe. Seems very incongruous. Actually the Skhul migration during an earlier interstadial (versus the 85K OOA event) is recognized as a dead end; it did not contribute to modern populations. The 40K into europe is from S Asia viw ME. The genetics supports this.

another mainstream image:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...D-World-Map.GIF

see the haplo F in South India. F is the progenitor line for the vast majority of eurasians. Its singular presence in India is an indirect measure for variance across F as a whole. So we have here genetic evidence for the southern route using completely mainstream evidence.

Going back to first image. South Asia has earlier settlement (still underestimated) than europe. Even Aus has earlier settlement than europe. However, the E Siberian settlements are earlier than shown (IMO).

Also notice distribution of neanders in the image.

So as everyone can see, this is a "mainstream" view. You don't even need to go into the specialized literature. It is quite obvious.

Last is the fact that R is an asiatic and later process. This takes some work to confirm but is quite easy as well.