02-01-2005, 12:02 PM
http://www.vandemataram.com/biographies/pa...bchandrapal.htm
" He came back to India in 1919 and presided over the Bengal Provincial Conference held at Barisal in 1921. But, unfortunately, he kept himself completely aloof from the non-violent non-cooperation movement of Mahatma Gandhi which was now sweeping the country, and this made him extremely unpopular. He also criticised G. R. Das, the idol of the Bengalee nationalists, and entered into a bitter controversy with Maulana Muhammad Ali over the nature of the communal problem in India (1920-25).
<b>He opposed the non-cooperation movement mainly because it was associated with the Khilafat cause and pervaded by a blind reverence for Gandhijiâs leadership.</b> His importance as a public figure declined from active politics though he continued to express his views on national questions through books and articles till his death on 20 May 1932.
Aurobindo rightly described Bipin Chandra as one of the mightiest prophets of nationalism"
the pioneer author is either a liar or clueless - someone who likes to throw in any old name to support his argument.
" He came back to India in 1919 and presided over the Bengal Provincial Conference held at Barisal in 1921. But, unfortunately, he kept himself completely aloof from the non-violent non-cooperation movement of Mahatma Gandhi which was now sweeping the country, and this made him extremely unpopular. He also criticised G. R. Das, the idol of the Bengalee nationalists, and entered into a bitter controversy with Maulana Muhammad Ali over the nature of the communal problem in India (1920-25).
<b>He opposed the non-cooperation movement mainly because it was associated with the Khilafat cause and pervaded by a blind reverence for Gandhijiâs leadership.</b> His importance as a public figure declined from active politics though he continued to express his views on national questions through books and articles till his death on 20 May 1932.
Aurobindo rightly described Bipin Chandra as one of the mightiest prophets of nationalism"
the pioneer author is either a liar or clueless - someone who likes to throw in any old name to support his argument.