Yes, but that doesn't prevent us from pointing out that they are pornographers.
We can add these jerks to the "SouthAsia Circus" page on Jitnasa. I know someone suggested to Shri R.M. that they start a page, provide names of these media twerps, extracts from their articles, and publish our letters below them. Google will do the rest. Life is too short to spend railing at these idiots in THEIR media. Much sweeter to do it on media where we have fair access.
When people see themselves mentioned in kind, accurate factual accounts like
http://www.indiacause.com/columns/OL_040601.htm
they will start seeing that there is a cost. Well, they MAY see, considering how smart they are.
That article is there today and there tomorrow. NYT articles need registration after today.
<!--emo&:tv--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tv_feliz.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tv_feliz.gif' /><!--endemo-->
See for example:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Many persons have called the article things like âoutright stupid and incompetent journalismâ, âinsulting to Hindus,â etc. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Forget the "insulting to... " part - after all that was the writer's intention, so why give credit? But for the rest, WHERE ARE THOSE LETTERS? WHY CAN'T I SEE THEM?
This is the issue we must correct. When u Google for "Rothstein" 6 months from now, if the descriptor "idiot" occurs in 6 of the top 10 hits, with detailed explanation why, THEN, heh, we've made the NYT article really pay off. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->
We can add these jerks to the "SouthAsia Circus" page on Jitnasa. I know someone suggested to Shri R.M. that they start a page, provide names of these media twerps, extracts from their articles, and publish our letters below them. Google will do the rest. Life is too short to spend railing at these idiots in THEIR media. Much sweeter to do it on media where we have fair access.
When people see themselves mentioned in kind, accurate factual accounts like
http://www.indiacause.com/columns/OL_040601.htm
they will start seeing that there is a cost. Well, they MAY see, considering how smart they are.
That article is there today and there tomorrow. NYT articles need registration after today.
<!--emo&:tv--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tv_feliz.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tv_feliz.gif' /><!--endemo-->
See for example:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Many persons have called the article things like âoutright stupid and incompetent journalismâ, âinsulting to Hindus,â etc. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Forget the "insulting to... " part - after all that was the writer's intention, so why give credit? But for the rest, WHERE ARE THOSE LETTERS? WHY CAN'T I SEE THEM?
This is the issue we must correct. When u Google for "Rothstein" 6 months from now, if the descriptor "idiot" occurs in 6 of the top 10 hits, with detailed explanation why, THEN, heh, we've made the NYT article really pay off. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tongue.gif' /><!--endemo-->