[quote name='sai_k' date='14 February 2010 - 12:11 PM' timestamp='1266129205' post='104200']
..but I just lurk and try to understand what you guys talk. I visit here often to read what Arun ji says. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
Sai_K: I do not believe that remark was directed at you or constructive participates like you. I am happy to interact with you.
Gagan: You have ROCKSIM, use this confign for Nodong/re-painted Paki Gadha-Ghodi and see for yourself what apogee will be for lofted or depressed trajectory for a Paki missile aimed at Delhi, Agra, Mathura, Nagpur, Ahmedabad, Mumbai.
ADD/PAD for mid course intercept for the trajectories Pakis could/would use will not work, not withstanding Nodong published test flights trajectories, Pakis will not use those trajectories. Note that current know mid course interception by US plan to take down missile near mid point of it trajectory.
AAD/PAD have restricted umbrella coverage, given their known interception altitude. Like all ABM system, mid-course interception business is even more dependent on early warning systems and accuracy of precision radars. AAD is of no use if it is not aimed precisely (no matter how many AAD one shoots, even in a volley).
..but I just lurk and try to understand what you guys talk. I visit here often to read what Arun ji says. <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
![Wink Wink](http://india-forum.com/images/smilies/wink.png)
[/quote]
Sai_K: I do not believe that remark was directed at you or constructive participates like you. I am happy to interact with you.
Gagan: You have ROCKSIM, use this confign for Nodong/re-painted Paki Gadha-Ghodi and see for yourself what apogee will be for lofted or depressed trajectory for a Paki missile aimed at Delhi, Agra, Mathura, Nagpur, Ahmedabad, Mumbai.
Code:
Pakistan Ghauri - DPRK Nodong.cfg
Payload = 700.0 Kg, Number of Stages = 2, Simulation Time Granularity = 0.250 Second
Launch Direction = 45 degrees-North, Launch Latitude = 30.00 degrees
Segment-Name ISP(Vac) ISP(SL) Stage-Mass Fuel-Fract Burn-Time Thrust-Direction Diameter Length ThrustOverdrive OverdrivePeriod
Stage1 264.0 226.0, 15,092.0 0.880 110.0 Sec 47.0 Degree 1.35 Meter 16.00 Meter 35.00 % 30.00 %
RV 001.0 001.0, 00,001.0 0.865 001.0 Sec 45.0 Degree 0.50 Meter 04.00 Meter 05.00 % 10.00 %
ADD/PAD for mid course intercept for the trajectories Pakis could/would use will not work, not withstanding Nodong published test flights trajectories, Pakis will not use those trajectories. Note that current know mid course interception by US plan to take down missile near mid point of it trajectory.
AAD/PAD have restricted umbrella coverage, given their known interception altitude. Like all ABM system, mid-course interception business is even more dependent on early warning systems and accuracy of precision radars. AAD is of no use if it is not aimed precisely (no matter how many AAD one shoots, even in a volley).