The Age of the Indian Renaissance

[Bharatvarsh2]

Its not a "Hindu" Renaissance Mr. Subramaniam, but an "Indian" Renaissance.



If someone is a Hindu but a separatist, he is against us regardless of the fact that he is Hindu.

If someone is a Muslim/Christian but a patriotic Indian, he is with us regardless of his religion.



It is no longer about a religion, but about a nation. (Yes, I'm a devout Hindu saying this, but only because its good for the Indian nation).

This is hilarious & shows that most Hindus will never learn.



Ya Ketan we all know the biggest threat facing India are Hindu separatists <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />



By the way Ketan it may shock you but the only reason India is a nation is because of the so called Hindu religion, that's what holds together Panjab and Tamilnadu not a 60 year old constitution that isn't very readable or understandable.



According to your kind of thinking it's all fine and dandy if India becomes a Muslim majority nation as long as it's politically united under this 60 year old flag and constitution. This was the same option the so called "patriotic" Muslim Abul Kalam Azad had in mind, he opposed partition because he thought that Muslims in time could rule all of India. After all what reason is there for Kashmir to separate if every other part of India from Panjab to Tamilnadu is made Muslim majority?



I am guessing your patriotic kind won't be too eager to show up from the US & live in this Akhand Mughalistan when push comes to shove.



This kind of thinking is absurd & the very antithesis of what our ancestors thought.



Go talk to any white white Frenchman & ask him if he will be very satisfied if the nation of France survives intact with its current territory but the whites themselves reduced to a minority and Arab+Berber+African Muslims the majority. Even the most liberal of them will oppose it and rightly so, france is just a piece of land it's the so called white French culture that makes it a nation.



Our ancestors put political unity far below cultural unity which is why the current Stalinist set up was opposed by Gandhi whatever his faults when it comes to Islam. He rightly stood for decentralization, village autonomy whereas the Indian constitution was written to suit centralization with Delhi dictating to the rest of Bharat.



You may want to read up on the ancient gaNas (republics) like the Yaudheyas to see how this system worked.