1. This isn't even real *crypto*-christianism anymore. Recognisably christian footprints all over (for those who would care to notice):
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2010/03/i...alism.html
La seule réponse - àce moment:
2. A few days back, Reuters I think (there's a smaller chance that it may have been BeeBeeCee "News") had an entry on how Hindus could well soon erupt (i.e. presumably 'genocide') islamaniacs after said innocent islamaniacs had (unstated, but implied 'understandably') murdered a couple of random Karnatakans and vandalised Hindu stores in 'protest'/retaliation of the eviLL irreligious, non-Hindu Taslima Nasreen - who should NOT be Free To Speak, *obviously*. (If she had been stomping on the religion of the Hindus, then By All Means, Speak Dear Taslima. But don't dare to criticise christoislamania. That's the real definition of Freedom Of Speech, it's how it works in practice.)
Note how the news agency still made the Hindus the villains even though the only facts their very own news story had to relate were how solely the islamaniacs were the terrorists, and even though Hindus hadn't done anything at all (and if they were to in future, the islamic culprits would deserve losing two of their own for having already massacred two - presumably, because usually - Hindus. E.g. Bush visits India -> Hindus killed by "protesting" islamaniacs).
That's typically christo news: it's always anti-heathen even when the very victims of the verifiable news it is reporting on are heathens. It is always on the side of the perpetrators, on the side of the heathen-killers.
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2010/03/i...alism.html
Quote:Indian tabloid's Porno-journalismThe price for not exposing cryptochristianism when heathens still have the chance is much graver than one can imagine existing in our current time, as we do. As is the price of silence when Hindus should be vocally refuting the christoterrorist allegations made about their Gods and the way the Hindus perceive, understand and relate to their Gods. Because silence is taken for acquiescence, and then the christoarchive will record that the silent Hindus in the 20th/21st century "acquiesced" to the christianism's description that Shiva Lingam meant "phallus" to Hindus and that that is what they worshipped. When of course it is only christolying again - like the christolies about jeebus having ever existed, when he never did.
www.[color="#0000FF"]deccanherald[/color].com/content/56109/it-nitya-ananda-swamis-ashram.html
ââ¬Å........... His minions for whom initiation to the order follows three simple steps: ââ¬Ålistenââ¬Â to the Paramahansa Nityananda, hear his ââ¬Åawakening talks everydayââ¬Â and wear ââ¬Ëmalaââ¬â¢ ââ¬Åenergised by the Masterââ¬Â. They also pray and worship the Shiva phallus....."
The quality of journalism (sic) in India has never been great - courtesy the omni-presence of Communist fellow travellers and Nehru dynasty sycophants -
and has degenerated into tabloid trash over the last decade. But, the article above is approaching downright pornography of the Wendy Doniger / MF Hussain variety.
Notice how the rag matter of factly denigrates the entire Hindu religion with references to
a "Phallus".
Regarding the individual in question and his alleged actions - I'm entirely neutral. It is entirely possible that he is guilty of the misdemeanors he is being accused of. It is also possible that he is a victim of a malicious
defamation campaign by Dravidian Christists.
The Tamil TV channel that is
playing up the whole affair is owned by scions of the Dravidian neanderthal party.
With a witch hunt by the Indian tabloid media in progress, "innocent until proven guilty" simply does not apply! In India, this does not apply to Hindus anyway...
My primary objection, though is the de-humanization and ridicule of Hindu religion by sexually obsessed brown Michael Witzels and Wendy Donigers running rampant with their lacerous pornography.
Supine acquiescence by Hindus
is what confers acceptability and legitimacy to the hate speech of
the [color="#FF0000"]christist[/color] media.
[color="#FF0000"]P.S: One of the article's authors has the last name - Nandy, which incidentally is a Serampore christist (Bengali) name.[/color]
Contrast this tabloid's atrocious
attitude with the apology tendered by another newspaper in the same state (Karnataka) when confronted by rioting adherents of the "religion of Peace" in protest against a
fact based article by Taslima Nasrin.
Would these "Phallus" journalists have dared to similarly denigrate an article of faith in Islam?
Posted by karyakarta92 at 3/03/2010 06:26:00 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Reactions:
La seule réponse - àce moment:
Quote:Harish said...
exactly karyakarta.. this entire "phallus" thingie has moved from the realms of some arcane description to main stream media potrayal of our holiest of gods(Lord Shiva)..(the fact that they are not even related.. is irrelevant)..
[color="#800080"](I agree with the rest of it, but just lodging this disagreement for the record -
"holiest of gods": We're not monopolytheists. Shiva is not the "sole" holiest of Hindu Gods. Where a limit to holy-ness has been demarcated - as the superlative "holiest" implies - and with Shiva defined at that limit, then by definition the Hindu Gods are all the very extreme of sanctity and auspiciousness. E.g. Agni, being a prime purifier, is Holy in his very essence. And "Sarva Mangala Mangalyam/Mangalye" is said of Surya and Lakshmi. <- For instance. So: etc. etc.)[/color]
also the use of the word "minions"..
the temerity with which people in general play with Hindu sentiments is astounding..
[color="#0000FF"]btw.. this entire episode totally reeks of pre-planned conspiracy (dravidian ishtlye)...remember when jayendra saraswathi was humiliated and denigrated in the name of some "murder charges".. which later turned out to be completely false..[/color]
[color="#800080"](What happened to the Kanchi acharya was christoterrorist conspiracy: the christian inquisition of the heathen. Plus DMK is also cryptochristian - some day this will come out. So the conspiracy was christian all round.)[/color]
[color="#FF0000"]swami nithyananda has been in the forefront of reviving vedic traditions(even instates like TN ) and has been against Xtian conversion.. not to mention that he is from "low caste" and has been attracting followers by the thousands...[/color]
[color="#800080"](While I don't know any specifics, I wouldn't be remotely surprised if Nityananda is innocent. Because when christianism is active at its loudest or most violent against a Hindu Swami or other such Hindu Hero, that's when you know a full heathen is in all likelihood involved: the unacceptable sort of inconvertible, i.e. the kind who generates more incovertibles/the kind that creates immunity to christianism.
Christianism specifically identifies such heroic Hindus who resist and who are inoculating the Hindu population with their anti-bodies to christianism. Having identified these Key Hindu Individuals, christianism then terrorises them with a special brand of Extreme Christoterrorism. And so it christoterrorises them either to death - like it did to that sweetheart Swami Lakshmanananda - or with torture, intimidation and character-assassination like Kanchi Shankaracharya, or with character-assassination, torture AND (probable) silent death like the unforgettable framed-but-innocent Dara Singh.)[/color]
so how to stop this hindu juggernaut.. manufacture some "scandal".. some riots etc..play the clip a thousand time on some TV channel and ensure that hindus lose faith in everything that is theirs... the dravidian parties have perfected this defamation campaign to the last T....
[color="#800080"](It's christianism. Hindus MUST learn to identify cryptochristianism.)[/color]
but may be this time around they might be playing around with some one different.....
nobody in this country seems to listen to other than acts of love and peace...
3/03/2010 6:48 PM
2. A few days back, Reuters I think (there's a smaller chance that it may have been BeeBeeCee "News") had an entry on how Hindus could well soon erupt (i.e. presumably 'genocide') islamaniacs after said innocent islamaniacs had (unstated, but implied 'understandably') murdered a couple of random Karnatakans and vandalised Hindu stores in 'protest'/retaliation of the eviLL irreligious, non-Hindu Taslima Nasreen - who should NOT be Free To Speak, *obviously*. (If she had been stomping on the religion of the Hindus, then By All Means, Speak Dear Taslima. But don't dare to criticise christoislamania. That's the real definition of Freedom Of Speech, it's how it works in practice.)
Note how the news agency still made the Hindus the villains even though the only facts their very own news story had to relate were how solely the islamaniacs were the terrorists, and even though Hindus hadn't done anything at all (and if they were to in future, the islamic culprits would deserve losing two of their own for having already massacred two - presumably, because usually - Hindus. E.g. Bush visits India -> Hindus killed by "protesting" islamaniacs).
That's typically christo news: it's always anti-heathen even when the very victims of the verifiable news it is reporting on are heathens. It is always on the side of the perpetrators, on the side of the heathen-killers.