[quote name='sudhanshu' date='10 March 2010 - 05:00 PM' timestamp='1268220145' post='105026']By internal resevation of 33% for women in political parties will be the best way to uplift of the women in Parliyament & Assemblies, caz, Soniya Gandhi, Indira Gandi, Sushma Swaraj, Zayalalita, Mamta Banergy <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> , Mayawati, Pratibha Patil, etc. are the example of women power, their caliber, and the achievment aquired by them are not the result of reservation, the status achieved by them are only the result of their struggle.[/quote]Sonia is not Indian but Italian, I doubt she needs you to play sheepdog for her rights, since she has proven herself capable of sucking up all privileges for herself. What "struggles" did she undergo? She slept her way into power in India: she married Rajiv and solely on the 'merit' of marrying into the "Gandhis", she's now able to play Santa Helena Part II.
Also, what is this 33% reservation you're hawking "will be the best way to uplift women" (assuming I actually made sense of your English)? I suspect women want not merely 33% but 50% reservation on any income you ever make. I gauge - as telepathically as you "feel" their opinion (after all, if you can telepathise, so can I) - that women's collective future is best secured when you hand over your dough to them. In fact, you can give it to me for safekeeping: I will give it to them, trust me. Someone as blindly buffoonish as you in jumping to women's Rescue won't backtrack, surely. So put your money where your mouth is: women have struggled very hard for that 50% of your income (so my telepathic skills, which are not to be questioned, tell me).
True representation in governance is of ideals and principles alone. Gender is entirely irrelevant. Even in the extreme case of there being all men or all women in parliament, no sane person would care as long as those in charge do their job correctly and it is representative of the interests of the Indian populace.
That and that alone is sensible. And any (wo)man with half a brain would agree. Just because someone has the chromosome combination for a female does not make them representative in any other respect of other women. And as far as ideals of the Dharmic populace go, they are shared by both men and women - collectively called "humans" <- you might want to look up that word in a dictionary sometime - and they don't need alien ideological terrorists or local converts and ignorant stooges to hijack their political representation using something as insipid and meaningless as sharing the same chromosomal combination. "Oh what a coincidence, Sonia is XX and so is the Indian woman!" <- And that's where all similarity ceases.
But I guess you can't see that, any commonsense you might have had at birth is obviously drowned out by your having over-convoluted your head with the many 'inspiring' communist screeches of meaningless Forced Equality (e.g. by numbers, but I note that even this forced "equality" of communism is a blatant contradiction: you're selling 33% not the ~50% of male-female ratio; are there women who actually buy the con that the brains who did the thinking for you are trying to pin on them?)
People who can't speak at all shouldn't be electing themselves, uninvited, to speak for others. <- There's a free tip. Subsequent tips will cost you, and the costs will increase exponentially. Oh, and I telepathise once more that "women" are still waiting for that 50% of your income. But since you're so generous and sympathetic to their success, I know you will hand all 100% over without question to doubly prove you're not a hypocrite. All that's left for you then is to Hurry Up with the money while remaining Quiet.
Also, what is this 33% reservation you're hawking "will be the best way to uplift women" (assuming I actually made sense of your English)? I suspect women want not merely 33% but 50% reservation on any income you ever make. I gauge - as telepathically as you "feel" their opinion (after all, if you can telepathise, so can I) - that women's collective future is best secured when you hand over your dough to them. In fact, you can give it to me for safekeeping: I will give it to them, trust me. Someone as blindly buffoonish as you in jumping to women's Rescue won't backtrack, surely. So put your money where your mouth is: women have struggled very hard for that 50% of your income (so my telepathic skills, which are not to be questioned, tell me).
True representation in governance is of ideals and principles alone. Gender is entirely irrelevant. Even in the extreme case of there being all men or all women in parliament, no sane person would care as long as those in charge do their job correctly and it is representative of the interests of the Indian populace.
That and that alone is sensible. And any (wo)man with half a brain would agree. Just because someone has the chromosome combination for a female does not make them representative in any other respect of other women. And as far as ideals of the Dharmic populace go, they are shared by both men and women - collectively called "humans" <- you might want to look up that word in a dictionary sometime - and they don't need alien ideological terrorists or local converts and ignorant stooges to hijack their political representation using something as insipid and meaningless as sharing the same chromosomal combination. "Oh what a coincidence, Sonia is XX and so is the Indian woman!" <- And that's where all similarity ceases.
But I guess you can't see that, any commonsense you might have had at birth is obviously drowned out by your having over-convoluted your head with the many 'inspiring' communist screeches of meaningless Forced Equality (e.g. by numbers, but I note that even this forced "equality" of communism is a blatant contradiction: you're selling 33% not the ~50% of male-female ratio; are there women who actually buy the con that the brains who did the thinking for you are trying to pin on them?)
Quote:But the reservation indicates that the needs our sympathy for thier sucsses, against of this India is the contry where we have a lot of Miths and Truth of the women power in all fields,eg.( Devotional,Social, Financial, Political, Burocratical, etc.) -What did he just say <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' />
People who can't speak at all shouldn't be electing themselves, uninvited, to speak for others. <- There's a free tip. Subsequent tips will cost you, and the costs will increase exponentially. Oh, and I telepathise once more that "women" are still waiting for that 50% of your income. But since you're so generous and sympathetic to their success, I know you will hand all 100% over without question to doubly prove you're not a hypocrite. All that's left for you then is to Hurry Up with the money while remaining Quiet.